Re: [rtcweb] Requesting "SDP or not SDP" debate to be re-opened

Robin Raymond <robin@hookflash.com> Tue, 18 June 2013 17:20 UTC

Return-Path: <robin@hookflash.com>
X-Original-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CC1C721F8F24 for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 18 Jun 2013 10:20:45 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.639
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.639 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.107, BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_24=1.552, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MIME_8BIT_HEADER=0.3]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id pb7LR2oZkSQa for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 18 Jun 2013 10:20:45 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-ob0-x22c.google.com (mail-ob0-x22c.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4003:c01::22c]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3AFBB21F8930 for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Tue, 18 Jun 2013 10:20:45 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-ob0-f172.google.com with SMTP id wo10so4952612obc.31 for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Tue, 18 Jun 2013 10:20:44 -0700 (PDT)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject :references:in-reply-to:content-type:x-gm-message-state; bh=ag6tHtGaN5VTW3SNK82inoy0d1h0Wl01hKfTdStwnTA=; b=kmb0a0pK925XKm94QCWH+PvntUD8maTQj3IFPENz3YEeq9QtbKWtlysZYE5Ad8H8W/ E/OTXVj7JoNT94CT57CdSsD0WsKalJjhAJHe6h4yMeZ+wEwGHBy3+77rLYEmH6u32RBk 8i1w+ZfXShxkmdXXP3SZS2f8HSROQtLaBFaPvwReq+ir8ZyWW1uTJyvfX08QGNsCtMdk 0vIlp4+l0tOfZX5ye3vZLiT2ALhNJFFv12ku5GqGNAhiuGJmfidVquPhSIgelgcWhsxG hdK8iU0z2rH1qh7siWx0fl6lX2jicN3kq3EfR+ZggdWW9vikkI7w9uDSj9o+sVDc0ly4 CQiw==
X-Received: by 10.60.92.163 with SMTP id cn3mr12696291oeb.107.1371576044740; Tue, 18 Jun 2013 10:20:44 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from Robins-MacBook-Pro.local (CPE602ad08742f7-CM602ad08742f4.cpe.net.cable.rogers.com. [99.224.116.224]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id z5sm22661938obw.4.2013.06.18.10.20.42 for <multiple recipients> (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Tue, 18 Jun 2013 10:20:43 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <51C096E8.2000300@hookflash.com>
Date: Tue, 18 Jun 2013 13:20:40 -0400
From: Robin Raymond <robin@hookflash.com>
User-Agent: Postbox 3.0.8 (Macintosh/20130427)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: =?UTF-8?B?ScOxYWtpIEJheiBDYXN0aWxsbw==?= <ibc@aliax.net>
References: <CALiegfkajJPxWZTzjYssP91VW+StStLpxoxGCkjOLKDMUWc0rA@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CALiegfkajJPxWZTzjYssP91VW+StStLpxoxGCkjOLKDMUWc0rA@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------080607090602050601070408"
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQk2nWgBti7+u3e0gifw0977fgspyDWuoSPSRtvLxomxgus19nbMhxxpG+Ecd2hypMtM0apG
Cc: "rtcweb@ietf.org" <rtcweb@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [rtcweb] Requesting "SDP or not SDP" debate to be re-opened
X-BeenThere: rtcweb@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Real-Time Communication in WEB-browsers working group list <rtcweb.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/rtcweb>
List-Post: <mailto:rtcweb@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 18 Jun 2013 17:20:45 -0000

+1

... and to be clear it's SDP with offer/answer that really makes it 
horrible. Replacing with nicer JSON or a wrapper API solves nothing IMHO.

-Robin


> Iñaki Baz Castillo <mailto:ibc@aliax.net>
> 18 June, 2013 12:36 PM
>
> I would also appreciate that those in favour of mandating SDP as the
> core communication for WebRTC explain their rationale again (given the
> number of arguments against SDP and the frustration SDP is causing),
> and also that they give arguments and responses to all the SDP related
> issues nicely summarized in this mail:
>
> http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/rtcweb/current/msg07873.html
>