Re: [rtcweb] Summary of Application Developers' opinions of the current WebRTC API and SDP as a control surface

Peter Thatcher <pthatcher@google.com> Fri, 19 July 2013 14:52 UTC

Return-Path: <pthatcher@google.com>
X-Original-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E3E6B11E8205 for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 19 Jul 2013 07:52:21 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 2.449
X-Spam-Level: **
X-Spam-Status: No, score=2.449 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-4.229, BAYES_20=-0.74, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, J_CHICKENPOX_101=0.6, J_CHICKENPOX_102=0.6, J_CHICKENPOX_32=0.6, J_CHICKENPOX_46=0.6, J_CHICKENPOX_53=0.6, J_CHICKENPOX_54=0.6, J_CHICKENPOX_62=0.6, J_CHICKENPOX_73=0.6, J_CHICKENPOX_83=0.6, NO_RELAYS=-0.001, WEIRD_QUOTING=1.396]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id tUAnB6sNjzKp for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 19 Jul 2013 07:52:19 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-pd0-x22e.google.com (mail-pd0-x22e.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400e:c02::22e]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6B8A411E8145 for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Fri, 19 Jul 2013 07:52:16 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-pd0-f174.google.com with SMTP id 10so4376182pdc.33 for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Fri, 19 Jul 2013 07:52:16 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type; bh=6Fi3CRs/o5MpEJgIx73Au8v8MGyYIYX78YI27vtU+J0=; b=L1YvjsAunKT+9U15HneCi2SXHxSimMe8t8IQX2lHCrkgwz8Cw+0UDUPvXmJsQyd0M0 MuQuqoHn9c6ZVxi89OntT13u/DmEk4SBin0RBqIxDyFl1wVJoKF1jwhAt7GjEJKE5kCW rtHDdUQmLK7Ess4gPxXzNT1B2E8zMkhQAYsAUVkBodGkWeXr6R/bNu8WKBFFKyBd16Oe TNUPD28AaM1koKIvuGeKUvE5XtF/hX7LPJwQKT0aQwIRwFgKTP34vnq50jvBPXauhLVC KCtU7Cq9E7urHxUh/T6R8IVTSthSOhrqLnkmIZ1yyKxmWjhgicTYRZH8Cr1wp1Ds+RJC A+TA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type:x-gm-message-state; bh=6Fi3CRs/o5MpEJgIx73Au8v8MGyYIYX78YI27vtU+J0=; b=X7b0o5mn15nWS4ChdBTatKmbWKlfMK0U9YSiX2LHngo/CxTUISBz8VzFJcKbXBjZCM GdRE848UU7QZAkRM14AIsUsnVz/inn1lzNDJTAKxfLeMCnmZAVLHJms8FO2DeZVLUIMr XDqSFQ4ixjAvGJduTBlDSraC2seO2gBg2sxyIruehJBeDtW8P2B+sM/KYjecUXdZMCyQ CXKemz0Da67FCThvAf6tFknv6Hu6U8RZc70ebHnHJE8ElbHJ35X4Scp2mEldYLx/w1mD h4Fz/52ZwGRTc76ayWTudRRhcpQkw6uJYMfPt81aI8LB/XEF2OqympRKY5hFMJzYpI1e ml8Q==
X-Received: by 10.66.141.4 with SMTP id rk4mr18456613pab.127.1374245536099; Fri, 19 Jul 2013 07:52:16 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.66.78.195 with HTTP; Fri, 19 Jul 2013 07:51:34 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <E795F35A-B0A5-4BD8-B807-C97B76EC586B@iii.ca>
References: <CAJrXDUGMohpBdi-ft-o_uE7ewFkw7wRY9x7gYEncjov7qi-Bew@mail.gmail.com> <CABcZeBPa4wBS8pYq=0wesMOfL6TkeC7QGAZ8pWwOcnkhkJqWfA@mail.gmail.com> <CAJrXDUFxo8P8wxh8jX3019yPQOuwQ0eVdsFmRXsbWdWinnc5oA@mail.gmail.com> <CABcZeBOTKpmFC34waqZ4kA-P8t+E6yY9gX1JFCHhsBH0+CF-Qw@mail.gmail.com> <1447FA0C20ED5147A1AA0EF02890A64B1C30BC0F@ESESSMB209.ericsson.se> <CAD5OKxtKLMf_d=8GSMrqfNhDHPe9MFP2ZTKzZHFn9CyMr-gSVQ@mail.gmail.com> <1447FA0C20ED5147A1AA0EF02890A64B1C30C833@ESESSMB209.ericsson.se> <CAJrXDUHOZf21aXgQMrdjTV8Fok+fVp-2SuhTra0JGy0Jq=Wi0Q@mail.gmail.com> <CAHp8n2mNdNiXCCNUdEvKgAsh_pPn=jNs+56VCg4PMKbUmOGztQ@mail.gmail.com> <CABkgnnUZMAuDocwZWXn9a+Xj3kkcX0uyRgjDmy-hQxpTDKWj3w@mail.gmail.com> <1447FA0C20ED5147A1AA0EF02890A64B1C30CF49@ESESSMB209.ericsson.se> <CALiegfmiRsOXL97XDzMRQ_Vvbk9zaDBBvCPxr_=zbDJbnMZ_8A@mail.gmail.com> <E795F35A-B0A5-4BD8-B807-C97B76EC586B@iii.ca>
From: Peter Thatcher <pthatcher@google.com>
Date: Fri, 19 Jul 2013 07:51:34 -0700
Message-ID: <CAJrXDUHi3Rs4ioWqX4-ACF4crfDJT5Z71pvzzQvW_HqGqUH0VQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: Cullen Jennings <fluffy@iii.ca>
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary=001a11c39d18038e6604e1de7955
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQkd6AJzQdE40PgZ0gaBfDxP07ZFtuVMDX3EGThAsklERfLIXvixUWmYpUuY7Pmfy2sWdkvbgY/D9ZHQhXt4GFZLTrYNXPFmgSy2e4VcXwArrTBDjOP2Hg2jRZGK9DBHuDQtzIOsp1H8eupAOb3RfmZImi4IL77rSzemoIe6Ji0NAx2GJWtskK3MWoKWpWVry+gnU6Aw
Cc: "<rtcweb@ietf.org>" <rtcweb@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [rtcweb] Summary of Application Developers' opinions of the current WebRTC API and SDP as a control surface
X-BeenThere: rtcweb@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Real-Time Communication in WEB-browsers working group list <rtcweb.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/rtcweb>
List-Post: <mailto:rtcweb@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 19 Jul 2013 14:52:24 -0000

Here you go:




On Fri, Jul 19, 2013 at 7:00 AM, Cullen Jennings <fluffy@iii.ca>; wrote:

> Can someone please email a full copy of the spreadsheet to the list so it
> is in the archives - thanks
>
> On Jul 9, 2013, at 3:18 AM, Iñaki Baz Castillo <ibc@aliax.net>; wrote:
>
> > 2013/7/9 Stefan Håkansson LK <stefan.lk.hakansson@ericsson.com>;:
> >> I want to be very clear and careful on what I say. So I am repeating:
> >>
> >> * My comment that I think Eric is right in that there is consensus on
> >> providing APIs that allow most use-cases to be met without SDP mangling
> >> is meant only in that context: SDP O/A is kept (and PeerConnection more
> >> or less as is and so on).
> >
> > Hi Stefan,
> >
> > You insist that "there is consensus on keeping SDP O/A but providing a
> > better API". Given current discussions IMHO it is clear there is not
> > such a consensus (not at all). Or may be you are just talking about
> > two years ago in some IETF meeting (if so I'm sorry).
> >
> > Please review the results in
> >
> https://docs.google.com/a/aliax.net/spreadsheet/ccc?key=0AuaKXw3SkHMSdHlZdV9RN0xSWFhybVl4anJLRkVPV0E#gid=1
> >
> >  Bad for advanced stuff: 94%
> >  OK for 1.0: 40%
> >
> > IMHO such a result indicates all but "let's keep SDP O/A and improve a
> > bit the API" (I mean now, in July 2013).
> >
> >
> > Best regards.
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Iñaki Baz Castillo
> > <ibc@aliax.net>;
> > _______________________________________________
> > rtcweb mailing list
> > rtcweb@ietf.org
> > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb
> _______________________________________________
> rtcweb mailing list
> rtcweb@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb
>