Re: [rtcweb] Results of call for consensus on ICE transport parameter issue

Christer Holmberg <christer.holmberg@ericsson.com> Mon, 25 February 2019 20:04 UTC

Return-Path: <christer.holmberg@ericsson.com>
X-Original-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 30EC312D7F8 for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 25 Feb 2019 12:04:10 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.3
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.3 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=ericsson.com header.b=U1uxdF/l; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=ericsson.com header.b=AfvWOF7Y
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id gnB4-ekB3gNU for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 25 Feb 2019 12:04:07 -0800 (PST)
Received: from sessmg22.ericsson.net (sessmg22.ericsson.net [193.180.251.58]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1C1A6129A85 for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Mon, 25 Feb 2019 12:04:06 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=ericsson.com; s=mailgw201801; c=relaxed/relaxed; q=dns/txt; i=@ericsson.com; t=1551125045; x=1553717045; h=From:Sender:Reply-To:Subject:Date:Message-ID:To:CC:MIME-Version:Content-Type: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From: Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References:List-Id: List-Help:List-Unsubscribe:List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=EA3hrCIRlYf1qhncMbiwFruuospH3Dz4cx00MKm03wQ=; b=U1uxdF/lZwm7MNgEjZCr+Wnz5KQwSwsa0Y4p6av9+eqS++/53F4sFNwgt6GFIPz8 obst5q/IEdg+6Z6D9HnbSiuymu1GmZp6neBbqKEIpJU6uAc41lc8b2un+oJstYNq AIScWeOVui91ghb1kIYKivhQbrtMnN7NKkM8maWQ8l0=;
X-AuditID: c1b4fb3a-5c9c29e00000672c-55-5c744a35a186
Received: from ESESBMB505.ericsson.se (Unknown_Domain [153.88.183.118]) by sessmg22.ericsson.net (Symantec Mail Security) with SMTP id CF.FD.26412.53A447C5; Mon, 25 Feb 2019 21:04:05 +0100 (CET)
Received: from ESESBMB505.ericsson.se (153.88.183.172) by ESESBMB505.ericsson.se (153.88.183.172) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_CBC_SHA256_P256) id 15.1.1466.3; Mon, 25 Feb 2019 21:03:59 +0100
Received: from EUR04-VI1-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (153.88.183.157) by ESESBMB505.ericsson.se (153.88.183.172) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_CBC_SHA256_P256) id 15.1.1466.3 via Frontend Transport; Mon, 25 Feb 2019 21:03:59 +0100
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ericsson.com; s=selector1; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=EA3hrCIRlYf1qhncMbiwFruuospH3Dz4cx00MKm03wQ=; b=AfvWOF7YOjrVfg1W7ZTCs7eQL1ymhVf3Es7pGfjH8KXGNzITP8YFWRPq4/w3GVAD1fr0x77ZKn7f3J0vabKc22MVbUzFKDncF6Uxsq4fhtKTLCobk/0CKuKIoPrv5gRrA+1lh4mzadkYRx0B1Tjj0Hgjho0O4OHqOq5Rf+i+JhU=
Received: from HE1PR07MB3161.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com (10.170.245.23) by HE1PR07MB4441.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com (20.176.167.146) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.1665.13; Mon, 25 Feb 2019 20:03:58 +0000
Received: from HE1PR07MB3161.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::dd59:bc9e:2910:48ae]) by HE1PR07MB3161.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::dd59:bc9e:2910:48ae%3]) with mapi id 15.20.1665.012; Mon, 25 Feb 2019 20:03:58 +0000
From: Christer Holmberg <christer.holmberg@ericsson.com>
To: Justin Uberti <juberti@google.com>
CC: Roman Shpount <roman@telurix.com>, Ted Hardie <ted.ietf@gmail.com>, "RTCWeb IETF" <rtcweb@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [rtcweb] Results of call for consensus on ICE transport parameter issue
Thread-Index: AQHUxYHCF4jGTlyGqkCBEfyt1ATxTKXhqseAgAYIbID///M5gIAFAbmAgANMu4CAAGGBAIAAhLWAgABALID//+HzAIAAI8oA
Date: Mon, 25 Feb 2019 20:03:58 +0000
Message-ID: <00148707-E12E-4844-9763-0A4BC8C1EFC9@ericsson.com>
References: <CA+9kkMDMMfEU2QE9AkPXsCgHp1gB=X6_-jAKvH6FsWhqNkV_Kg@mail.gmail.com> <CAOJ7v-2QLpD5Y5xdB1jKPS3uqsh7TMFFMR57YB1KTPTCcJ1F7w@mail.gmail.com> <0F9730B2-3E44-439D-9832-4C4AEBC054B5@ericsson.com> <CAD5OKxvHWr2wPhzdT_v8mAgOVBC0E1DHfGMqBNCtyGBD-+0U-g@mail.gmail.com> <CAOJ7v-2yHxAnzFsXFap=KgM8hWvOWksQVKnbO7UEfy475qURcg@mail.gmail.com> <CAOJ7v-2+vz=fiwqD_x8D5yeHdkkRJE8v6WbYAYxWa1kZGqGaFA@mail.gmail.com> <8C8AC253-4995-4FD8-B9A7-2E4F303B5153@ericsson.com> <CAOJ7v-2KX-20HZSa_rBJ_o-oFnu2eSWK+3wZaUCsfnaBGzei_g@mail.gmail.com> <E7496DAB-7846-44B4-8C58-FA3BB5D55BC6@ericsson.com> <CAOJ7v-145rMZrM25Zc2KLVvyLC80DnC7nLZu7H_ayRPUgMzq9w@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAOJ7v-145rMZrM25Zc2KLVvyLC80DnC7nLZu7H_ayRPUgMzq9w@mail.gmail.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/10.16.1.190220
x-originating-ip: [89.166.49.243]
x-ms-publictraffictype: Email
x-ms-office365-filtering-correlation-id: f3c7b7f3-3094-45c2-e32e-08d69b5c6127
x-microsoft-antispam: BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:(2390118)(7020095)(4652040)(8989299)(5600110)(711020)(4605104)(4534185)(4627221)(201703031133081)(201702281549075)(8990200)(2017052603328)(7153060)(7193020); SRVR:HE1PR07MB4441;
x-ms-traffictypediagnostic: HE1PR07MB4441:
x-ms-exchange-purlcount: 3
x-microsoft-exchange-diagnostics: =?utf-8?B?MTtIRTFQUjA3TUI0NDQxOzIzOkJXeDAwR2Y5V0t5c0hmWTZPQkxhSHRYZExk?= =?utf-8?B?a1E0VnZSUzBiYzdYcjRqdFlrOGhlNEJVakU3c2pnUU5reWtQS0w5aFhweFQ3?= =?utf-8?B?aXFQNnFWOGRZTDFDODJ0anhHSVpuckFtaE5YU2V2N3lPQitrdkdYaDZHSDJw?= =?utf-8?B?dVN6YjQ4OE02Y1VlRmZFVUE3dmlyVHRIRHRoczVORjJLMFRvRkxuV2xTVnlx?= =?utf-8?B?RGRFR0ZucXlDdWcrOENURDI1Z3g0ZGEwUEdha0ZqUCtDTjFrTmF6cFZKdU4r?= =?utf-8?B?czlZN2F0bVJvQUlZZFgycnpncmd0OEI4Wi9TdWgxMEZKOW44MnJROFpwaGE0?= =?utf-8?B?b1RjT0QvU3oxenVTUlIvNjRqdGpkeGVsblJleGxWQW5QWjhuNUR2RFJQTnEr?= =?utf-8?B?bzc1RjNSSmxMSVFPNjBBak9LVTVKME85aExZcXcrL1RaelZWZTJGSE1wai9q?= =?utf-8?B?Tm01QzhtbEZXTTlyNDY0Z0ZEUzFCQlBneGpVZ0U2bE5pd2hNWjMwV1VnKzVx?= =?utf-8?B?OEp3a2YrOTNXMWt0b3dvSHBZbVVRSVE3NGhYL08vdVh0ejVBbTJudE5BalBq?= =?utf-8?B?Qm44dzFJR2ZTQnBENTVyTy9OOUNGRWFiUlViYXNvQjBycG9SV2lRcWNDYzNt?= =?utf-8?B?aHZPbDlDbkVVckZvdGw2SGVhbzB6bTZSOTI2U3ViQWswTkoyN1dhUTQ2R0du?= =?utf-8?B?QXdLZ1FjamYzN0M1amQ1NkYvZEs4bm9uVDBJcXlOcFVWOWNlWUJjOXRXVHVH?= =?utf-8?B?a003ODB1alRQdzVzeGlTMWwyMng0RnJEWGdrYXdoV0l1eTdVcm5lU1ZGT2dG?= =?utf-8?B?UEIzb2JzZ0lyem9ZM29OL3RvcUM1dnZTSitsNUwzcG9aSG5RUmlMR21OcTFD?= =?utf-8?B?b2VCbktIbmE1RXJ3MFZGVDZFaVVhd0ZsWEErbU5Nc1VaTHV5bDR5RHEvRGM4?= =?utf-8?B?aERKQW1henVWUGNNK0RzRXVEZUtqRklJL0haYlp6cHhGTjZYcWMxbXdEQStP?= =?utf-8?B?U0xqMEdDLzhhV0p4dTJkeUt2czlpSmx5MjB5WEVmV2d1ZEN4NVlOTnVXZ3hT?= =?utf-8?B?ZnhjdGZrZVVjUG0zWFV3RTBteWdsNkJsRGVpVDVORmk2eVNJaXJraVJsdlcx?= =?utf-8?B?cU9iVkMrRm8vR3ExNXhWWTVSSGdwakNGakpVVWdyTzlqQzVzNHVoNVZTdWxz?= =?utf-8?B?OC9xbXpLeTVmVlN3QmxrQnc2NDJTWkIydU5xWHNzYU0rVWR3c1hXVjhScGpF?= =?utf-8?B?Z1VCMDA4R0pici84T21VZXh6NnBTblNTM0ZhZkpVcVBKT1NVR0wzbEJUVUNr?= =?utf-8?B?Q3BlakFkdFcvT3JuZnNLWHhGYTBXb29FNWNQTmlEUHFHSk9QMXBmMkl6VWdG?= =?utf-8?B?M3p4UkRqaHB4ZDdpUjg2RlhuQWtKOE5uS2lkUDUzL2pnS3BXTDlTMk1rSnJJ?= =?utf-8?B?RTVINlB1bllYdWpHNEhmZjVDQ1NRSGdKQ2hQUWZTRXBoSWZqTFBMKzZWaVNL?= =?utf-8?B?U2REM2tKL1NtdGpUOUVDRisxVjREZkI1dkdIWjdzZWluWG5PVzRCK21nMVps?= =?utf-8?B?NkxoZlQ5b0lkUDdETEZPaTJXemtPanA5cGNzME9Ra3pHYm1McEo2MHhMalhz?= =?utf-8?B?ejZwOHg2RGo1bFBxbXJjcytpS3ZCalQ0YzlicXlUYk52bVlZMjUrRWswdXNU?= =?utf-8?B?NWtVZWthODgrVEU1K2hWYXlYK292Tit2S1ovZ1dvZEwxaWl3b2tqdG93c1NT?= =?utf-8?B?UjgzYk52Y0dmMzVqSEJOWnorSW1wZGVodXZDdk82TEJUSWZyRU0yZUNqTk5E?= =?utf-8?B?Y2wrLzBRUWVXL1NHd2R3MWQydnRRNlY5U3owc3BZMXdUQkVXTDhwbjNVYW1Y?= =?utf-8?Q?eV2Z0zcbA/sBKIPFoZpVbPXjLD2sDBoz?=
x-microsoft-antispam-prvs: <HE1PR07MB4441EFE423BB7E2860F96561937A0@HE1PR07MB4441.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com>
x-forefront-prvs: 095972DF2F
x-forefront-antispam-report: SFV:NSPM; SFS:(10009020)(376002)(39860400002)(396003)(366004)(346002)(136003)(199004)(189003)(58126008)(33656002)(93886005)(966005)(66066001)(71190400001)(71200400001)(8936002)(6306002)(83716004)(97736004)(478600001)(82746002)(2906002)(54896002)(236005)(54906003)(6512007)(102836004)(53546011)(5660300002)(76176011)(99286004)(6506007)(53936002)(6346003)(6436002)(316002)(86362001)(68736007)(2616005)(486006)(36756003)(7736002)(44832011)(186003)(11346002)(476003)(229853002)(8676002)(81156014)(3846002)(6116002)(446003)(6486002)(81166006)(4326008)(6246003)(256004)(25786009)(6916009)(106356001)(606006)(26005)(105586002)(14454004); DIR:OUT; SFP:1101; SCL:1; SRVR:HE1PR07MB4441; H:HE1PR07MB3161.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com; FPR:; SPF:None; LANG:en; PTR:InfoNoRecords; A:1; MX:1;
received-spf: None (protection.outlook.com: ericsson.com does not designate permitted sender hosts)
authentication-results: spf=none (sender IP is ) smtp.mailfrom=christer.holmberg@ericsson.com;
x-ms-exchange-senderadcheck: 1
x-microsoft-antispam-message-info: S1FfP9CBolZuuNlZxR56zsZCo3pz8Bu9Gq6EuTHPmm1PloGQuDpwm2jL2OH5DuUeNePe7wq64S7XJSvx+o7iFgO4oRsxpYWqCi7n8k8gH9YkmcOaFzmsD/AC3vfv6b/9/2VRftvwlyOg+d7KBCLpGbNX/MuBHx5TRP5aacLnc8OPGS3+bsvbmITvRCa2E6hpVrSmq191WKpaxvoduMW4SiVaMXQcAQF0ZWeC6FAxyyIVs+S/kjrksyeoL424vxnvgO4zLI/PYVjxR1z6+QPxt1hlRGnwkdnwP6ZiYNU4hs+2KoKE48G6iQxVPZ/mx2AAgGxTafG9C/QjX/SRLRscGAE0vxR2+ifd3wfLCsUs+orio/ZuJLkFDMXf0kbqr+YZjmd2g/F+EqP/mSc8n2EY7R3J5+QeQ5HK9IZAQf0v7Ys=
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_00148707E12E484497630A4BC8C1EFC9ericssoncom_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-Network-Message-Id: f3c7b7f3-3094-45c2-e32e-08d69b5c6127
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-originalarrivaltime: 25 Feb 2019 20:03:58.8183 (UTC)
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-fromentityheader: Hosted
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-id: 92e84ceb-fbfd-47ab-be52-080c6b87953f
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-mailboxtype: HOSTED
X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: HE1PR07MB4441
X-OriginatorOrg: ericsson.com
X-Brightmail-Tracker: H4sIAAAAAAAAA02SbUhTURjHOffebXejwfGm+aD2YauktLTCaESYEcQIjPrQCzayoZcczWX3 LtE+WKvM2iqtZtnQ1ByEZUqrmUpGmkS+lKWUzcqXtt4IKjUsTUZuZ4Hffv/z/J/zf57DYWmu UxLFGkxmXjDpjWqpgrm6+37uijVbzLqVNW9kGncppyl7UUprbvuLZBpLRXIKo212vJdpq1yH tU7nFKUdtOdsY9IU6zN5oyGXFxKT9ymy3JfdKOepjcr7e2GaPoYen6SsSM4CToJLjQ6pFSlY Dncg8I8V0URMInBNdIWEk4IR2xVJQDC4hIafA2cpUrFT8Nbei4j4gKDB921WsKwUa8Dmjw+E hONYGHW0SAJMYwP4+oaDPB/vhH7vQ0Q8u8BX4ZcQNoG1YSp4zuAl0FHYQwdYiTdAceNzhmSV S+CLpzvYIMfboeaURxpghBfA7646ioRFwqCvMrQpBueDXppwBHz1krAInAj3zo8w5FwFz76P hvwLoa/ShginwuQtSzAYsAdBpdcbaoiDP20XQ5dGQXXvLxkxeTloHmiSksIBqA2OHeAYGL9T JyWmK1J4VTxBl6AEx5xpCWdAfWORzBFcOww6r/oYx+yr0ngZNLQkEosK7LZRGeGlUFheEWIt lN0ooeZ6qhB7E0WIvChm71+9OoEXDBmieNCUYOLNLjT7wdru/V3XhNo+b2xHmEXqecrXm8w6 TqLPFfOz2xGwtDpcufeHqOOUmfr8I7xwMF04bOTFdhTNMupI5QwXpuPwfr2ZP8DzObzwv0qx 8qhjaJ61zFOfEZt7u1Nv7J8u6H666M1l9Eg/PMmdXlwzsDlds6fpknj/TOqTvJ7qsdauta6R d0mDi2KWn4hvTWr+pD0nX1YXvvGFDJcLJ48ORb9SUVGtqlMT8ZZhZcpZ93hWd8cOU8HdQ2nC taGZbR93vvQfH9ZRv7bXPrSEbTWbw66nqxkxS78qjhZE/T99xAURXAMAAA==
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/rtcweb/ON2xZKJo4N3TjEkFIOBy3X-H7R0>
Subject: Re: [rtcweb] Results of call for consensus on ICE transport parameter issue
X-BeenThere: rtcweb@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Real-Time Communication in WEB-browsers working group list <rtcweb.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/rtcweb/>
List-Post: <mailto:rtcweb@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 25 Feb 2019 20:04:10 -0000

Hi,

>I believe the current PR makes JSEP internally consistent.

Ok, I wasn’t sure that is what you meant when you said that you “found a way to address this” 😊

Regards,

Christer



On Mon, Feb 25, 2019 at 11:43 AM Christer Holmberg <christer.holmberg@ericsson.com<mailto:christer.holmberg@ericsson.com>> wrote:
Hi,

I am not sure what other document you refer to, but it really depends on what the text is talking about: the semantics of the <proto> field, which is a transport protocol, or whatever is used as a transport protocol (e.g., an RTP profile).

Having said that, I am aware that documents unfortunately don’t use consistent terminology, so I wouldn’t be surprised if the 4566bis terminology isn’t used everywhere (also, there have been discussions about the 4566bis terminology itself…).

My personal preference would be to be aligned with 4566bis, but as long as we are consistent within JSEP I can live with it.

Regards,

Christer


From: Justin Uberti <juberti@google.com<mailto:juberti@google.com>>
Date: Monday, 25 February 2019 at 19.54
To: Christer Holmberg <christer.holmberg@ericsson.com<mailto:christer.holmberg@ericsson.com>>
Cc: Roman Shpount <roman@telurix.com<mailto:roman@telurix.com>>, Ted Hardie <ted.ietf@gmail.com<mailto:ted.ietf@gmail.com>>, "rtcweb@ietf.org<mailto:rtcweb@ietf.org>" <rtcweb@ietf.org<mailto:rtcweb@ietf.org>>
Subject: Re: [rtcweb] Results of call for consensus on ICE transport parameter issue

Sure, but I think it makes sense to use the same terminology (i.e., "profile") as is used in other RTP-related documents.

On Sun, Feb 24, 2019 at 11:58 PM Christer Holmberg <christer.holmberg@ericsson.com<mailto:christer.holmberg@ericsson.com>> wrote:
Hi,

In 4566bis, <proto> defines a transport protocol.

In case of RTP, the text refers to RTP/AVP as an “RTP profile”, but it is still a transport protocol.

Regards,

Christer

From: Justin Uberti <juberti@google.com<mailto:juberti@google.com>>
Date: Monday, 25 February 2019 at 6.10
To: Roman Shpount <roman@telurix.com<mailto:roman@telurix.com>>
Cc: Ted Hardie <ted.ietf@gmail.com<mailto:ted.ietf@gmail.com>>, "rtcweb@ietf.org<mailto:rtcweb@ietf.org>" <rtcweb@ietf.org<mailto:rtcweb@ietf.org>>, Christer Holmberg <christer.holmberg@ericsson.com<mailto:christer.holmberg@ericsson.com>>
Subject: Re: [rtcweb] Results of call for consensus on ICE transport parameter issue

Found a way to address this with minor changes to the existing PR.

On Fri, Feb 22, 2019 at 5:46 PM Justin Uberti <juberti@google.com<mailto:juberti@google.com>> wrote:
Roman, thanks for raising this. I looked into this a bit and it's kind of ambiguous; https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc7850 uses "profile", "proto", and "protocol" (although "protocol" is used most frequently).

JSEP actually uses both profile and protocol to refer to the transport, depending on the section; if we make a change here, we should hit all usages, which probably means that it is outside of the scope of this particular issue.

On Tue, Feb 19, 2019 at 1:19 PM Roman Shpount <roman@telurix.com<mailto:roman@telurix.com>> wrote:
Hi Justin,

I did provide editorial feedback to the change on github:

1. This document refers to SDP protocol as profile. If you look at the referenced documents that define "profiles" in JSEP, they all refer to them as protocols. Also, in case of SRTP, profile is actually something different and refers to SRTP key parameters.

2. Default candidate does not have profile (or protocol), it has transport, port, and (connection-)address. So each "m=" and "c=" MUST be filled in with port, protocol, and address to match port, transport, and address of the default candidate for the m= section, as described in ice-sip-sdp.

Regards,
_____________
Roman Shpount


On Tue, Feb 19, 2019 at 3:05 PM Christer Holmberg <christer.holmberg@ericsson.com<mailto:christer.holmberg@ericsson.com>> wrote:
Looks good.

Regards,

Christer

From: rtcweb <rtcweb-bounces@ietf.org<mailto:rtcweb-bounces@ietf.org>> on behalf of Justin Uberti <juberti=40google.com@dmarc.ietf.org<mailto:40google..com@dmarc.ietf.org>>
Date: Saturday, 16 February 2019 at 3.57
To: Ted Hardie <ted.ietf@gmail.com<mailto:ted.ietf@gmail.com>>
Cc: "rtcweb@ietf.org<mailto:rtcweb@ietf.org>" <rtcweb@ietf.org<mailto:rtcweb@ietf.org>>
Subject: Re: [rtcweb] Results of call for consensus on ICE transport parameter issue

I have updated this PR to incorporate minor feedback that was received during the consensus call. Those who had feedback, please take another look and comment on the PR if you are satisfied.

On Fri, Feb 15, 2019 at 2:56 PM Ted Hardie <ted.ietf@gmail.com<mailto:ted.ietf@gmail.com>> wrote:
The chairs believe that there was rough consensus among those responding to make the change in:

https://github.com/rtcweb-wg/jsep/pull/863

Given the state of the document, it will be the Area Director's call as to how much of the post-working group approval process must be re-done.  Authors, please wait on his direction before publishing a new version with this merged.

Regards,
Ted and Sean
_______________________________________________
rtcweb mailing list
rtcweb@ietf.org<mailto:rtcweb@ietf.org>
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb
_______________________________________________
rtcweb mailing list
rtcweb@ietf.org<mailto:rtcweb@ietf.org>
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb