Re: [rtcweb] RTCWEB is not SIP

Bernard Aboba <bernard_aboba@hotmail.com> Fri, 11 November 2011 11:44 UTC

Return-Path: <bernard_aboba@hotmail.com>
X-Original-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DAC1421F84AD for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 11 Nov 2011 03:44:20 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -99.885
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-99.885 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_40=-0.185, MIME_8BIT_HEADER=0.3, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id b8KbhOMKYkju for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 11 Nov 2011 03:44:20 -0800 (PST)
Received: from blu0-omc3-s20.blu0.hotmail.com (blu0-omc3-s20.blu0.hotmail.com [65.55.116.95]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 568CE21F848D for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Fri, 11 Nov 2011 03:44:20 -0800 (PST)
Received: from BLU0-SMTP109 ([65.55.116.74]) by blu0-omc3-s20.blu0.hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.4675); Fri, 11 Nov 2011 03:44:15 -0800
X-Originating-IP: [203.69.99.17]
X-Originating-Email: [bernard_aboba@hotmail.com]
Message-ID: <BLU0-SMTP1090D4D5685F6B147F5A03093DD0@phx.gbl>
Received: from [172.20.1.192] ([203.69.99.17]) by BLU0-SMTP109.phx.gbl over TLS secured channel with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.4675); Fri, 11 Nov 2011 03:44:15 -0800
References: <4EB26D22.5090000@ericsson.com> <FA65A239-CC86-4AC3-8A5A-91B7701C3FB5@cisco.com> <BLU152-W488BAA56546BEA4D42B4C893DF0@phx.gbl> <4EBA741A.1010307@alvestrand.no> <CAAJUQMiv3EyT3MzAUCzfXusG2Md-DnkA0sa3Hnx5CGVdh919ag@mail.gmail.com> <CALiegfkCQv75=ACNB2vK1Mi=S4Q=nastG_LUgd1ohzSeKmBVtQ@mail.gmail.com> <387F9047F55E8C42850AD6B3A7A03C6C0134A992@inba-mail01.sonusnet.com> <CALiegfkZvViEmeOBpE00XyATLfRKs4EVii6UzuBFfW3a7KkNDw@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CALiegfkZvViEmeOBpE00XyATLfRKs4EVii6UzuBFfW3a7KkNDw@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0 (1.0)
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
X-Mailer: iPad Mail (9A334)
From: Bernard Aboba <bernard_aboba@hotmail.com>
Date: Fri, 11 Nov 2011 19:44:17 +0800
To: Iñaki Baz Castillo <ibc@aliax.net>
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 11 Nov 2011 11:44:15.0638 (UTC) FILETIME=[3D3CEB60:01CCA067]
Cc: "<rtcweb@ietf.org>" <rtcweb@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [rtcweb] RTCWEB is not SIP
X-BeenThere: rtcweb@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Real-Time Communication in WEB-browsers working group list <rtcweb.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/rtcweb>
List-Post: <mailto:rtcweb@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 11 Nov 2011 11:44:21 -0000

+1

Iñaki Baz Castillo said:
> 
> WebRTC is not SIP...
> 
> IMHO we should stop talking about SIP in this WG....

> First priority is to define WebRTC regardless of federation...