IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [rtcweb] Draft agenda for IETF 87

"Cullen Jennings (fluffy)" <fluffy@cisco.com> Thu, 11 July 2013 19:04 UTC

Return-Path: <fluffy@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 176E921F9307 for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 11 Jul 2013 12:04:59 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -110.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-110.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-8, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Ns6OxgflX294 for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 11 Jul 2013 12:04:53 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rcdn-iport-1.cisco.com (rcdn-iport-1.cisco.com [173.37.86.72]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 87BCC21F93B9 for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Thu, 11 Jul 2013 12:04:53 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=498; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1373569493; x=1374779093; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:references: in-reply-to:content-id:content-transfer-encoding: mime-version; bh=Qr6rh+Z9OVZHtx20RcmzuRjUvxryQPNWUBpPtg+/kcI=; b=DYqxjeKh9FU9XrpUuxz+dYleNYzhtgjQpdmpI/6uXFtSD5+q+bUUhd9z 8FwzknahRd+JGgzypSDI30QuETTGgcQv2E7URzor8c1pgOhY8EHUhHyVW l2HYpHqhKUCOlgHVACmG8E6n7FQjE8feTOcliF+bMhDuTUhEFXeL4lzYQ E=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AnoFAHMB31GtJXHA/2dsb2JhbABagwl/gj+/FIEHFnSCIwEBAQMBHVwFCwIBCA4UJDIlAgQOBQiIAQa3Uo4vfwIxB4MJbAOIb6A1gxGBcTc
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.89,1045,1367971200"; d="scan'208";a="233547225"
Received: from rcdn-core2-5.cisco.com ([173.37.113.192]) by rcdn-iport-1.cisco.com with ESMTP; 11 Jul 2013 19:04:53 +0000
Received: from xhc-aln-x08.cisco.com (xhc-aln-x08.cisco.com [173.36.12.82]) by rcdn-core2-5.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id r6BJ4rqE022464 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=FAIL); Thu, 11 Jul 2013 19:04:53 GMT
Received: from xmb-aln-x02.cisco.com ([169.254.5.116]) by xhc-aln-x08.cisco.com ([173.36.12.82]) with mapi id 14.02.0318.004; Thu, 11 Jul 2013 14:04:52 -0500
From: "Cullen Jennings (fluffy)" <fluffy@cisco.com>
To: Emil Ivov <emcho@jitsi.org>
Thread-Topic: [rtcweb] Draft agenda for IETF 87
Thread-Index: AQHOflbcl1Vkg5a8kUyEc2Bfr2lLkplgETwAgAAY8wA=
Date: Thu, 11 Jul 2013 19:04:52 +0000
Message-ID: <C5E08FE080ACFD4DAE31E4BDBF944EB1135D31FD@xmb-aln-x02.cisco.com>
References: <CA+9kkMBuCTdFsUMtmuBz6BnrSJMpHywEZU+x+m8ARnGprvzDzA@mail.gmail.com> <CAPvvaa+dyYmvsareEy1a9+7ketEFjNarsnRLXkpT_YHPTYni2w@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAPvvaa+dyYmvsareEy1a9+7ketEFjNarsnRLXkpT_YHPTYni2w@mail.gmail.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.21.126.7]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-ID: <B2E7D6E71907EC48A4F97771330CA2BE@emea.cisco.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Cc: "<rtcweb@ietf.org>" <rtcweb@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [rtcweb] Draft agenda for IETF 87
X-BeenThere: rtcweb@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Real-Time Communication in WEB-browsers working group list <rtcweb.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/rtcweb>
List-Post: <mailto:rtcweb@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 11 Jul 2013 19:04:59 -0000

On Jul 11, 2013, at 10:35 AM, Emil Ivov <emcho@jitsi.org>
 wrote:

> Hey Ted,
> 
> I am sorry I must have missed your call for presentations.
> 
> In you last mail on the subject you mentioned that we will be discussing No Plan in Berlin together with plans A and B. Could we please add this to the agenda?
> 
> Emil
> 
> 

No. We believe that conversation needs to happen in the W3C WebRTC WG. I expect to see a message from W3C chairs on this at some point.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email