IETF Logo Mail Archive

[rtcweb] H.264 SVC and BUNDLE

Christer Holmberg <christer.holmberg@ericsson.com> Wed, 29 August 2012 18:54 UTC

Return-Path: <christer.holmberg@ericsson.com>
X-Original-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3BB0921F86DB for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 29 Aug 2012 11:54:04 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.158
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.158 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.091, BAYES_00=-2.599, HELO_EQ_SE=0.35, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id IobT1oiIMLEH for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 29 Aug 2012 11:54:03 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mailgw2.ericsson.se (mailgw2.ericsson.se [193.180.251.37]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7984321F86DA for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Wed, 29 Aug 2012 11:54:03 -0700 (PDT)
X-AuditID: c1b4fb25-b7f046d00000644c-48-503e6549214f
Received: from esessmw0197.eemea.ericsson.se (Unknown_Domain [153.88.253.125]) by mailgw2.ericsson.se (Symantec Mail Security) with SMTP id 4A.21.25676.9456E305; Wed, 29 Aug 2012 20:54:01 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from ESESSCMS0356.eemea.ericsson.se ([169.254.1.99]) by esessmw0197.eemea.ericsson.se ([153.88.115.87]) with mapi; Wed, 29 Aug 2012 20:54:01 +0200
From: Christer Holmberg <christer.holmberg@ericsson.com>
To: "public-webrtc@w3.org" <public-webrtc@w3.org>, "rtcweb@ietf.org" <rtcweb@ietf.org>
Date: Wed, 29 Aug 2012 20:50:05 +0200
Thread-Topic: H.264 SVC and BUNDLE
Thread-Index: AQHNhhenMhkLi/vCmkGQ1yfqZgaa8g==
Message-ID: <7F2072F1E0DE894DA4B517B93C6A05853409FF2F4C@ESESSCMS0356.eemea.ericsson.se>
References: <503E0B63.3020708@ericsson.com>, <E17CAD772E76C742B645BD4DC602CD8106A9810E@NAHALD.us.int.genesyslab.com>
In-Reply-To: <E17CAD772E76C742B645BD4DC602CD8106A9810E@NAHALD.us.int.genesyslab.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
acceptlanguage: en-US
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Brightmail-Tracker: H4sIAAAAAAAAA+NgFjrFLMWRmVeSWpSXmKPExsUyM+Jvra5nql2AwY9GU4vej0sYLdb+a2d3 YPJYsuQnk8fReftZA5iiuGxSUnMyy1KL9O0SuDJerbrEUrCJuWLugr+MDYyXmboYOTkkBEwk Lhy9xQphi0lcuLeeDcQWEjjFKHGhV6uLkQvIXsAo8Wz1WZYuRg4ONgELie5/2iCmiECExNlJ aiDlLAKqEku7ephBbGEBWYn/Ew8wgtgiAkoSV5ZfZYew9SQ2bm4HG88rEC6xZtlNVohVxRJL J50Bi3MKhEjse3kHrJ4R6Jzvp9aAncksIC5x68l8qJMFJJbsOc8MYYtKvHz8jxWiXlTiTvt6 Roh6PYkbU6ewQdjaEssWvmaG2CsocXLmE5YJjKKzkIydhaRlFpKWWUhaFjCyrGIUzk3MzEkv N9JLLcpMLi7Oz9MrTt3ECIyPg1t+q+5gvHNO5BCjNAeLkjiv9dY9/kIC6YklqdmpqQWpRfFF pTmpxYcYmTg4pRoYlctnKHFwh4v2WdU+kc4sDr8juKlMWaw5bo375Wu/Zh/dz2JYNSVKRskr 4UaPThCL+u4NAcE6gc/FLpbf+ex31XR/5SbGE1emsenFR1dJs/ucsNPRuZnSLuhm3Pgi71Rx r/Kt3hq9hYL8waxlSfP/rvr+ofHt2u9ev15wTF7kutVGOGjvSQslluKMREMt5qLiRABzlRhX XQIAAA==
Subject: [rtcweb] H.264 SVC and BUNDLE
X-BeenThere: rtcweb@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Real-Time Communication in WEB-browsers working group list <rtcweb.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/rtcweb>
List-Post: <mailto:rtcweb@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 29 Aug 2012 18:54:04 -0000

Hi,

At the telco yesterday one of the Microsoft guys claimed that H.264 SVC does not work with BUNDLE, but he didn't have the details.

Could someone please explain the reason why he/she doesn't think H.264 SVC work with BUNDLE?

(Note, that if using the same port for the different codec layers is a problem, then it's not a BUNDLE problem - it's a generic multiplexing problem.)

Thanks!

Regards,

Christer

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email