Re: [rtcweb] RTCWeb default signaling protocol [was RE: About defining a signaling protocol for WebRTC (or not)]

Iñaki Baz Castillo <ibc@aliax.net> Tue, 20 September 2011 09:12 UTC

Return-Path: <ibc@aliax.net>
X-Original-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 023EC21F8B83 for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 20 Sep 2011 02:12:24 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.648
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.648 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.029, BAYES_00=-2.599, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, MIME_8BIT_HEADER=0.3, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 3QWNLhod-CrO for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 20 Sep 2011 02:12:23 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-vw0-f44.google.com (mail-vw0-f44.google.com [209.85.212.44]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5A85B21F8B81 for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Tue, 20 Sep 2011 02:12:23 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by vws5 with SMTP id 5so539107vws.31 for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Tue, 20 Sep 2011 02:14:48 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.220.213.132 with SMTP id gw4mr139187vcb.52.1316510088009; Tue, 20 Sep 2011 02:14:48 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.220.94.200 with HTTP; Tue, 20 Sep 2011 02:14:47 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <2E239D6FCD033C4BAF15F386A979BF510F0E12@sonusinmail02.sonusnet.com>
References: <CALiegfnOCxyTo9ffQ272+ncdu5UdgrtDT-dn10BWGTZMEjZoCg@mail.gmail.com> <2E239D6FCD033C4BAF15F386A979BF510F0C0A@sonusinmail02.sonusnet.com> <05CAC192-E462-421F-B1E5-B78DC8F60306@ag-projects.com> <2E239D6FCD033C4BAF15F386A979BF510F0C93@sonusinmail02.sonusnet.com> <16880306-5B3A-4EFD-ADE4-1201138D9182@acmepacket.com> <8584590C8D7DD141AA96D01920FC6C698C896B71@gbplmail03.genband.com> <CA+9kkMAwnnKKO5+q6ey4Z0QNxax1QF21vVtw8FNsHy_rmfenjQ@mail.gmail.com> <4E76E078.5020708@jesup.org> <8548CBBD-4E12-48F3-BC59-341FF45EF22F@acmepacket.com> <4E77495E.4000409@jesup.org> <CALiegfkTdCAeEdZbXP1Y9L6i4Anjrgf1CG6ZNj35WGoHL3p_Ew@mail.gmail.com> <4E774F92.4040405@jesup.org> <8ECCEE59-E855-4EA9-92B9-543D1585B1F0@ag-projects.com> <4E778F1F.9090105@jesup.org> <CEA0AC9E-6387-4066-95DC-0D70302E80A7@ag-projects.com> <4E77C3EC.9060801@jesup.org> <CAD5OKxtciYxaVpb7b3G9yMg1A97b9dkjkOpppZcSRzS5SAO3+A@mail.gmail.com> <2E239D6FCD033C4BAF15F386A979BF510F0DD8@sonusinmail02.sonusnet.com> <CALiegfkCrusXTrJt9ez4CkYNBUR4s8MDD75KsjexS0z-c=uPZA@mail.gmail.com> <2E239D6FCD033C4BAF15F386A979BF510F0E12@sonusinmail02.sonusnet.com>
Date: Tue, 20 Sep 2011 11:14:47 +0200
Message-ID: <CALiegfnie9Y=s7qkr3+_+_tKtgRQe8BuuopxBK=8pAh_XUt+Cw@mail.gmail.com>
From: =?UTF-8?Q?I=C3=B1aki_Baz_Castillo?= <ibc@aliax.net>
To: Ravindran Parthasarathi <pravindran@sonusnet.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Cc: Randell Jesup <randell-ietf@jesup.org>, rtcweb@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [rtcweb] RTCWeb default signaling protocol [was RE: About defining a signaling protocol for WebRTC (or not)]
X-BeenThere: rtcweb@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Real-Time Communication in WEB-browsers working group list <rtcweb.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/rtcweb>
List-Post: <mailto:rtcweb@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 20 Sep 2011 09:12:24 -0000

2011/9/20 Ravindran Parthasarathi <pravindran@sonusnet.com>;:
> I have answered to you in the another thread (http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/rtcweb/current/msg01172.html).  I understand that there are lot of thread, So you might have confused.

Hi Ravindran. It seems that you avoid replying to the questions in my
previous mail (3 points you have never answered). Same arguments was
given in the thread you point above, again without responses. Why?


> SIP or XMPP based protocol will be selected as a default protocol based on technical merit of a given RTCWeb signaling problem but it is a second stage.

What does it mean "SIP or XMPP based protocol will be selected as a
default protocol [...]"? Anyone reading your mails would assume that
such a decision is already taken. Is it? who took it?


Regards.

-- 
Iñaki Baz Castillo
<ibc@aliax.net>;