IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [rtcweb] Requesting "SDP or not SDP" debate to be re-opened

Peter Thatcher <pthatcher@google.com> Wed, 19 June 2013 19:50 UTC

Return-Path: <pthatcher@google.com>
X-Original-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3E99721F9F08 for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 19 Jun 2013 12:50:55 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.898
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.898 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.079, BAYES_00=-2.599, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, NO_RELAYS=-0.001]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id I1B-SVuvScDq for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 19 Jun 2013 12:50:54 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-pa0-x22b.google.com (mail-pa0-x22b.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400e:c03::22b]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BF60221F9F02 for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Wed, 19 Jun 2013 12:50:54 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-pa0-f43.google.com with SMTP id hz11so5518678pad.2 for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Wed, 19 Jun 2013 12:50:54 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type; bh=Ykxt2CxNoyfbo3sFAwhwZ2K4VGcuWnS/ehE9Tr6NUM0=; b=gfooYeKF2xpvhtly7XuPSl3QWEDj093E9U3ez37YFh2o+G6oFM+S4fcW06w3CHwFKW E0OMGdk1rYvkFv3CdjcGD1XGV/BZWm/kONajvUuQSfd5ahuuoiDdDjISPwJd1xOTkwrH Y7nTnG4HcNfbi6C9MQTwJppOcOpNte+xmNHZS8kypWy90G5gKRlR7qyByY6WISMBXMAu /bjT4vz+1jwsqCbqsdFLBlii/M/pMOzSv0Gw8pDIe5k4D69bn1ZIhcodOx7k0AgdQ1rJ CdkeWy2IIv+KsdGQ+mYK3Hug7ye8WeRrt17z224Ymgup3F1Oc+f0MIMusjNcwUWfqaqm AmFQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type:x-gm-message-state; bh=Ykxt2CxNoyfbo3sFAwhwZ2K4VGcuWnS/ehE9Tr6NUM0=; b=KGz8X8I2HUuoGKRnE+JbcvDTmn0y9X9aQFEIF0+LtHD3cw/fYEMyVTYYvuaODVYkLC iL39Rx11RQCgMd4gkmesuhY7ktFZQk/1Zt+Kwj6hVC0cvRgflnt70FE7inl01W+UJEwQ mdbCsiJYOH+BsK3uzY3PevSv5cYeELwqYHtyl8yNtyIrpRgJ3SJp6JyvTGmSgI59NUWm lwxIpl+/2ohZz+HNK7cYfm9HFptkYdBYRH8bzcK0lDHnaxe2imP2EHn4vejJbmu996VX /xynntno/OJSkBHd3pX/+urI/rPOd1sV1nATQ9Q594Ye8Ss9p55oBM0C8JQ2SYU/Ty8x cVzQ==
X-Received: by 10.66.120.164 with SMTP id ld4mr8223495pab.187.1371671454502; Wed, 19 Jun 2013 12:50:54 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.66.88.8 with HTTP; Wed, 19 Jun 2013 12:50:13 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <7594FB04B1934943A5C02806D1A2204B1C3B1680@ESESSMB209.ericsson.se>
References: <CALiegfkajJPxWZTzjYssP91VW+StStLpxoxGCkjOLKDMUWc0rA@mail.gmail.com> <CA+9kkMDk2L3SBPC08WU_5RcL16-Wzv8Mocj3-Qzmxz2E24ERGg@mail.gmail.com> <51C0C1A0.9010107@nostrum.com> <CAJrXDUGqSvsosZJhcRR-kCwEX1g_wvPnSZPmmcNwggk+Z9WNCA@mail.gmail.com> <CABkgnnWfV=5xBaRqAddqUURThs9J4T4+0HK4Ux07VA51r5oC3Q@mail.gmail.com> <CAJrXDUFNGKvWHw-yqeApEdTeuqMNPTDxvdKZ2DuzANmcR2y2CQ@mail.gmail.com> <7594FB04B1934943A5C02806D1A2204B1C3AE500@ESESSMB209.ericsson.se> <CAJrXDUHCkQSLab2UuY_vWP3Gr8uh+++c9mDq5f4sCpuaK5aeLQ@mail.gmail.com> <51C1B907.8060508@hookflash.com> <CAJrXDUG06jvPvhfNwZ6Puzxj7E4XxELG_fU=S7B_c=tnC9eoNQ@mail.gmail.com> <78192824-A516-4376-8D4F-3B052ED47A0C@matthew.at> <CAJrXDUGOYc_Z_qWD7J0ZzVdfwYOacH_p5PjZEg5aP1LUetffMA@mail.gmail.com> <51C1F2E9.20405@hookflash.com> <51C1F5ED.9090308@matthew.at> <CAJrXDUFvL2U5jfKMvcTJ_Pi_Yj=t1LoZO7MZTJcZavuByw5b_Q@mail.gmail.com> <7594FB04B1934943A5C02806D1A2204B1C3B1680@ESESSMB209.ericsson.se>
From: Peter Thatcher <pthatcher@google.com>
Date: Wed, 19 Jun 2013 12:50:13 -0700
Message-ID: <CAJrXDUGZ=M4SsSCYLUjs36C7JcbRPj2jhreKJgqH51YR_8oc-Q@mail.gmail.com>
To: Christer Holmberg <christer.holmberg@ericsson.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="047d7b0721cecb683804df87250c"
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQkldFuKS7+thUUA/J4D1ksns6Bv55ydMBVdRi9jj9GU9hmsy9tbFvIykPmbZyzwCOO0boORd1qMvo9z6blj6KNY/XZCxg4PWi+iE/H+0u5zc5hvJXi2awIMQlI9DGfH383VzxK/keIucrqgu/OckOGi67Q3SeEIXC9PVl/s5riNqFLlmStKne8YRihshLYfINl6YrDw
Cc: "rtcweb_ietf.org" <rtcweb@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [rtcweb] Requesting "SDP or not SDP" debate to be re-opened
X-BeenThere: rtcweb@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Real-Time Communication in WEB-browsers working group list <rtcweb.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/rtcweb>
List-Post: <mailto:rtcweb@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 19 Jun 2013 19:50:55 -0000

On Wed, Jun 19, 2013 at 12:47 PM, Christer Holmberg <
christer.holmberg@ericsson.com> wrote:

> Hi,
>
> >>> Why aren't we using the JavaScript object model for control of
> components instead of serializing our control requests via SDP/whatever
> format and hoping that it worked?
> >>>
> >> That's a great question. Have you read the CU-RTCWEB proposal? Is it
> any closer to what you imagined the RTCWEB API might be?
> >
> > My "NoPlan JS API" proposal also allows control of components without
> serialize control via a format, if the JS chooses to do so (SDP is still
> there if JS wants).  It only does so for media streams, not for transports,
> but it allows incremental improvement to the API.
>
> So, IF we decide to remove SDP and Offer/Answer, we'll end up arguing
> about "Plan C(U) vs No Plan"? :)
>
>
I think we already are :).


> Regards,
>
> Christer
>
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email