Re: [rtcweb] Dates for upcoming interim

Eric Rescorla <ekr@rtfm.com> Thu, 12 April 2012 15:50 UTC

Return-Path: <ekr@rtfm.com>
X-Original-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AD84421F869D for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 12 Apr 2012 08:50:08 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.142
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.142 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.835, BAYES_00=-2.599, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id C3igkr1jxuYH for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 12 Apr 2012 08:50:07 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-vb0-f44.google.com (mail-vb0-f44.google.com [209.85.212.44]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C20C221F8693 for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Thu, 12 Apr 2012 08:50:07 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by vbbez10 with SMTP id ez10so1726542vbb.31 for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Thu, 12 Apr 2012 08:50:07 -0700 (PDT)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:x-originating-ip:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding :x-gm-message-state; bh=deeVSsvyKznI6er45PPgjuJrO2jgc+tZGBqdWQW+sKY=; b=BVZT4JDADPsIH+3Ev+GSbAB6xH3k5K95tGBDxnA8R+oxLYuRQKWGw0e5N93e/mEtxo nvpJRuU6uWhb5hRbtbjiLQIEdNUX3G7HthK8zvlpejY0wA28vPyVUn0dT5wB0Jifktdq P3hoeJXlPj6i3dKxDeQxSm5RoklsI1LTNu5U9vd2M5duYaoHFSXfDiQNM4The2suNlDB wngkybQHelDyX9Z/hU8Lt0I7SlnDadTUEZX1FIswnY6h7lJpEuzcg6weX2dNAHzm9rIT FcCNJMbJHzagMI55imnk2Epu/wRbm3F6R7KFZQRUYsYdSgLyKF8qJPhdTiceN63U8Rk9 qWOg==
Received: by 10.52.65.134 with SMTP id x6mr1231182vds.60.1334245807228; Thu, 12 Apr 2012 08:50:07 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.52.19.233 with HTTP; Thu, 12 Apr 2012 08:49:26 -0700 (PDT)
X-Originating-IP: [74.95.2.173]
In-Reply-To: <CA+9kkMDRE5uEGZHmBMCK8KgXj5VgSJ66fViR=1GBCFBiU+42oA@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CA+9kkMDRE5uEGZHmBMCK8KgXj5VgSJ66fViR=1GBCFBiU+42oA@mail.gmail.com>
From: Eric Rescorla <ekr@rtfm.com>
Date: Thu, 12 Apr 2012 08:49:26 -0700
Message-ID: <CABcZeBO-E=KVJbWyRD6nXD51bX1Xf2jqeBB+tShdT-srbVPt0w@mail.gmail.com>
To: Ted Hardie <ted.ietf@gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQnju+QYU9cnui0e8w5QkDsu0E+NAISZourfEIPQkaWqlpMTgSDtE2gxzfjMom06aaSDlhKt
Cc: rtcweb@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [rtcweb] Dates for upcoming interim
X-BeenThere: rtcweb@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Real-Time Communication in WEB-browsers working group list <rtcweb.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/rtcweb>
List-Post: <mailto:rtcweb@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 12 Apr 2012 15:50:09 -0000

On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 8:20 AM, Ted Hardie <ted.ietf@gmail.com> wrote:
> After discussion between the WEBRTC and RTCWEB chairs, consulting the
> doodle poll, and working through the potential for co-location with
> CLUE, we have decided to set the date for the RTCWEB interim at June
> 12 & 13th, to be hosted by Ericsson in Stockholm.  We understand that
> the WEBRTC chairs will hold their meeting on June 11th.  If CLUE
> wishes to co-locate their meeting, the 14th and 15th will be
> available.  This would not have been possible on the previous week,
> given the national holiday in Sweden on the Wednesday of that week.
>
> We very much appreciated the work Eric put into his analysis, and in
> general we will try to prefer hubs; in this particular case, however,
> a large fraction of the Western European participants are either based
> in Stockholm or must fly through it to reach one of the larger hubs.
> Given the availability of a host and this data, we decided to select
> Stockholm for this meeting.

Thanks for resolving this.

Since I'm assuming we're going to be having more of these, I'd like
to ask the chairs to publish ASAP whatever rotation they are planning to
use in the future. This would be very useful for planning purposes,
as well as to allow discussion of the proposes rota well in advance

Thanks,
-Ekr