IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [rtcweb] Call for Consensus Regarding Selecting Recommended Audio Codecs

Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com> Fri, 18 January 2013 21:13 UTC

Return-Path: <martin.thomson@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 84C6921F878F for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 18 Jan 2013 13:13:44 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -5.474
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.474 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-1.875, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id h16v1ah90aUv for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 18 Jan 2013 13:13:44 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-la0-f47.google.com (mail-la0-f47.google.com [209.85.215.47]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9845921F8788 for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Fri, 18 Jan 2013 13:13:43 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-la0-f47.google.com with SMTP id fh20so4373641lab.34 for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Fri, 18 Jan 2013 13:13:42 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:x-received:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id :subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=1oDTzCQi0eyqLQXZTg3KjYiwJ5mi+wD9avwZFYEuZD8=; b=Oq/iH3UBBTd40hALEHfL1cBfCWSKgkM7KnKODGKyxWGVbCezy4BD9USROJ9FqtnYxR u40l20xlkRu/2s89JhibgFys7mN8xJSNnJ66hTxwWKuU+lSQM1XfV3v1Ouuc9ZMqJVGJ S6gNtjD3MXqZJuGVpW1srLuw8VJs1nf9hMCX5pgx3i38k+bZO0+hWuk0x+wJoBKvs88K hXcoK/gcO9NZTnEVYSFAwjrrriMF6Q1eDUv6K7SowSi6anvTUrTvfz0ShNNXZfYnE7qh Fu7rqd90W1Q0ucbnud7R5+VfVWIaxbwmWtXPYdk/9Caf/nON3DY3vvq19j59YKBA/Skd Z8fA==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.152.145.8 with SMTP id sq8mr9781589lab.21.1358543622555; Fri, 18 Jan 2013 13:13:42 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.112.57.20 with HTTP; Fri, 18 Jan 2013 13:13:42 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <EDC0A1AE77C57744B664A310A0B23AE20D7468AA60@FRMRSSXCHMBSC3.dc-m.alcatel-lucent.com>
References: <50D2CC6A.4090500@ericsson.com> <24103_1358435764_50F815B4_24103_9252_1_2842AD9A45C83B44B57635FD4831E60A076013@PEXCVZYM14.corporate.adroot.infra.ftgroup> <CAA79oD=kqbfHq9DCsVu06NPvcF=MxaGguNi-Tu5P-bXQxZPcAg@mail.gmail.com> <BBF5DDFE515C3946BC18D733B20DAD2338CF2F26@XMB104ADS.rim.net> <9F33F40F6F2CD847824537F3C4E37DDF013BD3C3@MCHP04MSX.global-ad.net> <B1E46FFE-7F62-4A10-AF80-FAC406BF428A@phonefromhere.com> <EDC0A1AE77C57744B664A310A0B23AE20D7468AA60@FRMRSSXCHMBSC3.dc-m.alcatel-lucent.com>
Date: Fri, 18 Jan 2013 13:13:42 -0800
Message-ID: <CABkgnnU9+=cmNN204pMURUFoY7Xqs22pfA30bSSBmjXiHduG7Q@mail.gmail.com>
From: Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>
To: "DRAGE, Keith (Keith)" <keith.drage@alcatel-lucent.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Cc: "rtcweb@ietf.org" <rtcweb@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [rtcweb] Call for Consensus Regarding Selecting Recommended Audio Codecs
X-BeenThere: rtcweb@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Real-Time Communication in WEB-browsers working group list <rtcweb.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/rtcweb>
List-Post: <mailto:rtcweb@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 18 Jan 2013 21:13:44 -0000

On 18 January 2013 12:39, DRAGE, Keith (Keith)
<keith.drage@alcatel-lucent.com> wrote:
> As stated that says that any additional wideband codec should have a lower priority than the mandatory to implement G.711.

Yes.  Let the implementation (or the user) make any decisions on
priority.  We don't need to force the negotiation of Opus, its quality
should ensure that happens.

v2.45.0 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status