IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [rtcweb] Consensus vs. Voting (was Re: Call for Consensus Regarding Selecting Recommended Audio Codecs)

"Cullen Jennings (fluffy)" <fluffy@cisco.com> Tue, 29 January 2013 18:00 UTC

Return-Path: <fluffy@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E532921F8A22 for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 29 Jan 2013 10:00:49 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -110.549
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-110.549 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.050, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-8, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id LRpBWAwL4dxh for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 29 Jan 2013 10:00:49 -0800 (PST)
Received: from rcdn-iport-4.cisco.com (rcdn-iport-4.cisco.com [173.37.86.75]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E5D1221F8A03 for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Tue, 29 Jan 2013 10:00:48 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=456; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1359482449; x=1360692049; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:references: in-reply-to:content-id:content-transfer-encoding: mime-version; bh=bPxKt+bno//X28kPRJu8QAkuzcyBeiVNyAJvVwxLzws=; b=Khk44QPPHOLa8RET4Xkz4qT3UFmRWUVnYvcoVb6sELNlSCcYI6cFvP7V RTk/fYp73sOEXb9BDFpCEksIxW8N+LwAcVFdIrr3W8jojSudSCYyzxxid XgFF1e9b8jZBNUC3XfQAP3C17tD4EP3mRuXNboieL7TTtrxdJby9UHj89 s=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AmUFAPULCFGtJXG8/2dsb2JhbABEhX+4XxZzgh8BAQQdHT8QAgEIIhQFCzIlAgQOBQiICbEVkCyQKGEDpliCd4Ik
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.84,561,1355097600"; d="scan'208";a="170015252"
Received: from rcdn-core2-1.cisco.com ([173.37.113.188]) by rcdn-iport-4.cisco.com with ESMTP; 29 Jan 2013 18:00:48 +0000
Received: from xhc-rcd-x06.cisco.com (xhc-rcd-x06.cisco.com [173.37.183.80]) by rcdn-core2-1.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id r0TI0mA3018366 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=FAIL); Tue, 29 Jan 2013 18:00:48 GMT
Received: from xmb-aln-x02.cisco.com ([169.254.5.197]) by xhc-rcd-x06.cisco.com ([173.37.183.80]) with mapi id 14.02.0318.004; Tue, 29 Jan 2013 12:00:48 -0600
From: "Cullen Jennings (fluffy)" <fluffy@cisco.com>
To: Jean-Marc Valin <jmvalin@mozilla.com>
Thread-Topic: [rtcweb] Consensus vs. Voting (was Re: Call for Consensus Regarding Selecting Recommended Audio Codecs)
Thread-Index: AQHN/kqRD8YvyoUl+k+L5pmTswZT0Q==
Date: Tue, 29 Jan 2013 18:00:28 +0000
Message-ID: <C5E08FE080ACFD4DAE31E4BDBF944EB1133A2EF7@xmb-aln-x02.cisco.com>
References: <50D2CC6A.4090500@ericsson.com> <6515_1357907583_50F0067F_6515_1738_1_2842AD9A45C83B44B57635FD4831E60A0747CC@PEXCVZYM14.corporate.adroot.infra.ftgroup> <BLU0-SMTP880A602A311CE05C9DC39FD0290@phx.gbl> <A26C56D5-C501-4823-8099-62AF7910B8A4@ntt-at.com> <580BEA5E3B99744AB1F5BFF5E9A3C67D16813E56EC@HE111648.emea1.cds.t-internal.com> <50F41D97.1030508@nostrum.com> <CAD5OKxtsWMfAV=K4sM+zLXoyVCgihwujH2gG9ziA5GuEtsU0sQ@mail.gmail.com> <2327AE82-FC1E-4D09-B6B4-E87F01BD3527@phonefromhere.com> <CAD5OKxtqT9o0tESF-jk1va=LRvdZDqPjGSZcEhLCKmni2818wA@mail.gmail.com> <00D8DD68-DB4D-450F-8787-8C32BD459937@phonefromhere.com> <CAD5OKxt+ATzv75acQh=06q9oMPUUSSMw7bhj3akbyr=UaqQz+Q@mail.gmail.com> <50F43AD0.3030404@mozilla.com>
In-Reply-To: <50F43AD0.3030404@mozilla.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.20.249.164]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-ID: <EEB047AB7CDC5243A987A86E448A466E@cisco.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Cc: "rtcweb@ietf.org" <rtcweb@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [rtcweb] Consensus vs. Voting (was Re: Call for Consensus Regarding Selecting Recommended Audio Codecs)
X-BeenThere: rtcweb@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Real-Time Communication in WEB-browsers working group list <rtcweb.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/rtcweb>
List-Post: <mailto:rtcweb@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 29 Jan 2013 18:00:50 -0000

On Jan 14, 2013, at 10:05 AM, Jean-Marc Valin <jmvalin@mozilla.com> wrote:

> "SHOULD include a PLC" only makes sense if you specify minimum quality
> requirements. Otherwise "repeat previous packet" or "fill with zeros"
> all count as PLC. Personally, I really don't feel like getting into a
> PLC quality spec.

Oh, the irony of we are fine with saying SHOULD do AEC (already in a WG draft) but we are not fine with saying SHOULD do PLC.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email