IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [rtcweb] BUNDLE with implicit rtcp-mux

Justin Uberti <juberti@google.com> Fri, 14 March 2014 18:14 UTC

Return-Path: <juberti@google.com>
X-Original-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 324D51A01B7 for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 14 Mar 2014 11:14:52 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.925
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.925 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.547, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id VU7kXE3m4CCc for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 14 Mar 2014 11:14:50 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-vc0-x231.google.com (mail-vc0-x231.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400c:c03::231]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3444A1A0185 for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Fri, 14 Mar 2014 11:14:50 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-vc0-f177.google.com with SMTP id if17so3094067vcb.36 for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Fri, 14 Mar 2014 11:14:43 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type; bh=WLBNIvNKUQdo5IW79TCNNSEHzGgwNTmk3UMF65mckx0=; b=SrwP9uqJgWt8wo1q7ySL2Xl7zzsdT4xuImF8FWiWr4fcWz1qf8MCzGKsMTCodCtJg7 NgTv/WSF53ryX6ER7tIl6VFvDQLoMrM7bErKU5vsDmpLiiJv6Sp4es9sKcncwFXa9Fcq EVr24nAy95KTydfYksfbSg+XoL8yCkSkkIWdE/wYKY/sv6xez6gj52MFmlxPjWgQcgHG Ddq0RKlStl+ZAoH4SN7v26bBKpDVZ6nUBQwAI0Yqc3zJKMg4SmUrX0aUO71vf0XjPquI QVudh0noj2TSomrL+NUJu6aTA8koVYkIMTQ4Vc0JnJMEdXmHrsMZMD5EnsPupcIQ9LPn Gc8A==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc:content-type; bh=WLBNIvNKUQdo5IW79TCNNSEHzGgwNTmk3UMF65mckx0=; b=KswJERy9SnOtSB0lDzXMKCl3PB+pl13W0bndMcoz+a2meAhiGL6wH/EMbEPSJd+e40 Sl+850bRDLc94ghx6t3bAsbgXzgO9tlZz9I8Bc/kOcuki6p/m2ZegCQjwr3gwLMSDvn2 Dxmrm0fXUuU+Om+gZPpGKKzN5SVE9N/S0QpSvg+5aoYg/sc53Em86F4BOphyTFdbqSQ0 k4+8zbGhQLPITCdDwC7cMYA6ZI+NRL6sEl2KjF/RipimdaT958v5+a0mNTt66NuN8bRw V3iigP4TG7VAldhl+HOUyux/EmeoNSDN4n9T6IJObKJBIce/AqbxXvbvAApiWGxDtqUr 70Xw==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQlc4KyQSuXNYLRD02uh7LHOkFNevk+0yO2JIAfAAt36xKrL5/e9rN3n9kVPL74BnfhPFEiDu9Q83MKHRierzJCdKQB+Za53E2I04Av+JfwiJe8IMvCQa1OTOl3EPpfSwY4jzNvSxkfF1+nP+cCV/eCm/EuDcmyzsuKPyqcWwNqmJTfnWKOzs1lrjskpnKCqY0x/9GYZ
X-Received: by 10.220.139.198 with SMTP id f6mr10044vcu.47.1394820883143; Fri, 14 Mar 2014 11:14:43 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.52.26.43 with HTTP; Fri, 14 Mar 2014 11:14:23 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <7594FB04B1934943A5C02806D1A2204B1D215B4C@ESESSMB209.ericsson.se>
References: <CAOJ7v-063mGE_zndtAqAMN2fJw7kWvUHX2SgyDMryfw_-aS-9w@mail.gmail.com> <7594FB04B1934943A5C02806D1A2204B1D1F1892@ESESSMB209.ericsson.se> <531DC52B.6020500@ericsson.com> <7594FB04B1934943A5C02806D1A2204B1D1FA6BC@ESESSMB209.ericsson.se> <531DCBE9.70701@ericsson.com> <7594FB04B1934943A5C02806D1A2204B1D1FA7B2@ESESSMB209.ericsson.se> <531DD756.50900@ericsson.com> <7594FB04B1934943A5C02806D1A2204B1D200086@ESESSMB209.ericsson.se> <532017DD.1060500@ericsson.com> <CAOJ7v-1u6eO4b1Qr4josdNoNBtW7s0Z82y570X4RwV0C4es2hg@mail.gmail.com> <7594FB04B1934943A5C02806D1A2204B1D212A7E@ESESSMB209.ericsson.se> <CAOJ7v-1YF+6Hfid+pPAHWZnjPeXJ+T81eV7Wk83+z4eCtUAgYw@mail.gmail.com> <cm0fhueueaioe4gj0u8m7vqa.1394776596681@email.android.com> <5322C475.5050402@ericsson.com> <CAOJ7v-3sr6TuPQ-tp-CaRLG16LfThhrckMM3Gcw5S8PNXztMoQ@mail.gmail.com> <7594FB04B1934943A5C02806D1A2204B1D215AAB@ESESSMB209.ericsson.se> <CAOJ7v-3+Q9rCsFoYeq9RFCdidnLkVYZAZx80oyRtkanGmRKX_w@mail.gmail.com> <7594FB04B1934943A5C02806D1A2204B1D215B4C@ESESSMB209.ericsson.se>
From: Justin Uberti <juberti@google.com>
Date: Fri, 14 Mar 2014 11:14:23 -0700
Message-ID: <CAOJ7v-2KMa+998T=_ps+518bufDjb1367cQYWpT5JfoNsxtb1w@mail.gmail.com>
To: Christer Holmberg <christer.holmberg@ericsson.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="047d7b34394043fac004f4950b46"
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/rtcweb/Q97ZjE5iR40JSTWoVRtXrw8HLcE
Cc: "rtcweb@ietf.org" <rtcweb@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [rtcweb] BUNDLE with implicit rtcp-mux
X-BeenThere: rtcweb@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Real-Time Communication in WEB-browsers working group list <rtcweb.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/rtcweb/>
List-Post: <mailto:rtcweb@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 14 Mar 2014 18:14:52 -0000

On Fri, Mar 14, 2014 at 10:40 AM, Christer Holmberg <
christer.holmberg@ericsson.com> wrote:

>
> Hi,
>
> > By "RTCP transport in the offer", I mean separate ICE candidates
> generated for a RTCP ICE component, the original problem that I was
> proposing to solve.
>
> Ok.
>
> But, again, we do have a decision that we are not going to specify
> procedures based on pre-knoweldge of BUNDLE support by the answerer. Or, at
> least that was the outcome in London, I guess it still has to be verified
> on the list.
>

???

I was there and I don't recall this decision; I spent half an hour
discussing this exact point in rtcweb based on a scenario you suggested
(namely, a new PC created from a fork). The discussion ended with some
interest but no consensus, which is why we are discussing it here in
email...

For sanity's sake, can you make it clear that you support this proposal?

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email