IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [rtcweb] division of responsibilities (was: Draft agenda for IETF 87)

"Cullen Jennings (fluffy)" <fluffy@cisco.com> Fri, 12 July 2013 17:42 UTC

Return-Path: <fluffy@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EF3F921E80AE for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 12 Jul 2013 10:42:45 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -110.562
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-110.562 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.038, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-8, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id aQLJ4ScCBwOE for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 12 Jul 2013 10:42:40 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rcdn-iport-7.cisco.com (rcdn-iport-7.cisco.com [173.37.86.78]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 68FD421E80AD for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Fri, 12 Jul 2013 10:42:40 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=353; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1373650960; x=1374860560; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:references: in-reply-to:content-id:content-transfer-encoding: mime-version; bh=Y8Ujir/m2GLb8Vjj2Vlg2O25ZUQFbd6Aogs3Lo4IByk=; b=RQRcQ2qvSuLAjN0pBZSaBf+DATeAtvkxx22vcabe9VCvAMVYHxObvq8i t/eODKy6vyb6CmvNmGcKKl3LjgOh6koCzHMMK95IH7tbT7bL5xDl8D29L e3uEtvOlEZpg3xd+VQPz5VvdulujcAi0qlmtagsfsLa7ywusTT4JTUH5y s=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AicFAH4/4FGtJV2d/2dsb2JhbABagwaBA4I/vxKBDBZ0giMBAQEDAXkFCwIBCCIkIRElAgQOBQiHdQMJBq8aDYhejHiCNgIxB4MLbAOIb40EjhCFJoMSgig
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.89,654,1367971200"; d="scan'208";a="234154239"
Received: from rcdn-core-6.cisco.com ([173.37.93.157]) by rcdn-iport-7.cisco.com with ESMTP; 12 Jul 2013 17:42:40 +0000
Received: from xhc-rcd-x14.cisco.com (xhc-rcd-x14.cisco.com [173.37.183.88]) by rcdn-core-6.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id r6CHgdHN019811 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=FAIL); Fri, 12 Jul 2013 17:42:39 GMT
Received: from xmb-aln-x02.cisco.com ([169.254.5.116]) by xhc-rcd-x14.cisco.com ([173.37.183.88]) with mapi id 14.02.0318.004; Fri, 12 Jul 2013 12:42:39 -0500
From: "Cullen Jennings (fluffy)" <fluffy@cisco.com>
To: Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>
Thread-Topic: division of responsibilities (was: Draft agenda for IETF 87)
Thread-Index: AQHOfxmZKPbXE869BEKXiSv5F7Mwd5lhpAaA
Date: Fri, 12 Jul 2013 17:42:38 +0000
Message-ID: <C5E08FE080ACFD4DAE31E4BDBF944EB1135D7999@xmb-aln-x02.cisco.com>
References: <CABkgnnUBdarwAoz=41_Nz1WSdYJ8gXUjxkggwFomHiC-efiN_w@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CABkgnnUBdarwAoz=41_Nz1WSdYJ8gXUjxkggwFomHiC-efiN_w@mail.gmail.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.21.69.236]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-ID: <5A8DDED43A4F394DA268B1F5BFF90F81@emea.cisco.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Cc: "<rtcweb@ietf.org>" <rtcweb@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [rtcweb] division of responsibilities (was: Draft agenda for IETF 87)
X-BeenThere: rtcweb@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Real-Time Communication in WEB-browsers working group list <rtcweb.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/rtcweb>
List-Post: <mailto:rtcweb@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 12 Jul 2013 17:42:46 -0000

On Jul 12, 2013, at 9:04 AM, Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>
 wrote:

> With all respect
> to the chairs, that's not something I trust them to rule on at this
> point.

just to be clear, I don't think the RTCWeb chairs have done anything remotely close to a ruling on this. We have taken censuses calls on the use of 3264 O/A.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email