Re: [rtcweb] confirming sense of the room: mti codec

Silvia Pfeiffer <silviapfeiffer1@gmail.com> Mon, 08 December 2014 20:17 UTC

Return-Path: <silviapfeiffer1@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 248151A6F1E for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 8 Dec 2014 12:17:27 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.749
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.749 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT=0.25, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id zk_0VMZJuWsA for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 8 Dec 2014 12:17:24 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-yh0-x233.google.com (mail-yh0-x233.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4002:c01::233]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 473D21A01FA for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Mon, 8 Dec 2014 12:17:24 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-yh0-f51.google.com with SMTP id a41so2632480yho.24 for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Mon, 08 Dec 2014 12:17:23 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=AJryg6hjeLxwXer72ZUW3dVp3Z00nFg09Jae+wrKVOE=; b=RczmcpO+XBxnPbgBrp8vYYTjihgNVtFh5LiaNMvPdlIzXYJIMl6hqECdRxHM1qxK3r ZV7v9vyQXOWl3lCEF9xvOyv1om5d45YTjLwWTBBlHMci32GALakt0xbgqAOoaIXRdeS4 lsekKS+WtwjglAcOXHWhga27JJ8PXGklMixnNMS9yK2ehBhmA2OeoYjuVfs7j2ApqW3J /94hnk4T2P95I/r7ctbPu4KqeB3nkIIxLmQvpE0miLaEbVVz0Z9jVgYaLKCA1PhGzRrX R+0tlq8omGgcGs4oMmugGf5H+yjryb2iJ7DZFMi8FxK1paN4ZdNA/s5KT9r/8BonJ039 IvJw==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.236.230.104 with SMTP id i98mr31239602yhq.169.1418069843487; Mon, 08 Dec 2014 12:17:23 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.170.135.193 with HTTP; Mon, 8 Dec 2014 12:17:23 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.170.135.193 with HTTP; Mon, 8 Dec 2014 12:17:23 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <CAOJ7v-3NbwmnU0eaZNzEQB4N8HxQjF61HgvOeMqVmA=uoLQ_TA@mail.gmail.com>
References: <E3FA0C72-48C5-465E-AE15-EB19D8D563A7@ieca.com> <5485CC5B.2030104@alvestrand.no> <CABkgnnV4vhxBAQzr3BcL78uk+fSGi9DNvG=9XfdUsQekpWp5FA@mail.gmail.com> <CAOJ7v-3NbwmnU0eaZNzEQB4N8HxQjF61HgvOeMqVmA=uoLQ_TA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 9 Dec 2014 07:17:23 +1100
Message-ID: <CAHp8n2=PZdsMJFqEDpuo11xAAMtx_vjtL5SU-wMMei6tbKw3YA@mail.gmail.com>
From: Silvia Pfeiffer <silviapfeiffer1@gmail.com>
To: Justin Uberti <juberti@google.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=089e01634d6c49b3d70509ba1d46
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/rtcweb/QG0aBaor2iIn4nTEgES8sTLs5Ns
Cc: rtcweb@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [rtcweb] confirming sense of the room: mti codec
X-BeenThere: rtcweb@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Real-Time Communication in WEB-browsers working group list <rtcweb.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/rtcweb/>
List-Post: <mailto:rtcweb@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 08 Dec 2014 20:17:27 -0000

I wasn't at the meeting, but I too support the compromise. It's non
optimal, but pragmatic and all that's achievable in the given circumstances.

Best Regards,
Silvia.
On 9 Dec 2014 04:40, "Justin Uberti" <juberti@google.com> wrote:

> I support the rough consensus as presented by the chair.
>
> As stated before - I think this plan represents a legitimate compromise
> in what had previously seemed like a stalemate. While not my ideal outcome,
> I think this is good for the WebRTC ecosystem - it ensures
> interoperability, and provides a reasonably clear path for reaching a
> completely RF solution.
>
> On Mon, Dec 8, 2014 at 9:27 AM, Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> On 8 December 2014 at 08:05, Harald Alvestrand <harald@alvestrand.no>
>> wrote:
>> > Since others who were present in the room are repeating their position
>> > on the list, I'll do so too.
>>
>> That's probably a good thing to do.  An almost anonymous humming sound
>> isn't a good basis for establishing a record.
>>
>> > I support the rough consensus as presented by the chair.
>>
>> +1
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> rtcweb mailing list
>> rtcweb@ietf.org
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb
>>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> rtcweb mailing list
> rtcweb@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb
>
>