Re: [rtcweb] Confirmation of consensus on audio codecs

Randell Jesup <randell-ietf@jesup.org> Wed, 29 August 2012 15:24 UTC

Return-Path: <randell-ietf@jesup.org>
X-Original-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3356221F86CF for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 29 Aug 2012 08:24:53 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.13
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.13 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.945, BAYES_40=-0.185]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id HZMlCpyf13cS for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 29 Aug 2012 08:24:52 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from r2-chicago.webserversystems.com (r2-chicago.webserversystems.com [173.236.101.58]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id ADC8E21F86B6 for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Wed, 29 Aug 2012 08:24:52 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from pool-173-49-141-60.phlapa.fios.verizon.net ([173.49.141.60] helo=[192.168.1.12]) by r2-chicago.webserversystems.com with esmtpsa (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from <randell-ietf@jesup.org>) id 1T6k8R-000Dc9-DD for rtcweb@ietf.org; Wed, 29 Aug 2012 10:24:51 -0500
Message-ID: <503E3422.6010508@jesup.org>
Date: Wed, 29 Aug 2012 11:24:18 -0400
From: Randell Jesup <randell-ietf@jesup.org>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1; rv:14.0) Gecko/20120713 Thunderbird/14.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: rtcweb@ietf.org
References: <9E2843EA-EBB9-40B3-898C-6B5216FAE7A5@cisco.com> <503E2BC2.1090705@acm.org>
In-Reply-To: <503E2BC2.1090705@acm.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report
X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - r2-chicago.webserversystems.com
X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - ietf.org
X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [47 12] / [47 12]
X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - jesup.org
X-Source:
X-Source-Args:
X-Source-Dir:
Subject: Re: [rtcweb] Confirmation of consensus on audio codecs
X-BeenThere: rtcweb@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Real-Time Communication in WEB-browsers working group list <rtcweb.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/rtcweb>
List-Post: <mailto:rtcweb@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 29 Aug 2012 15:24:53 -0000

I support the selection of Opus and G.711 and MTI codecs (as I did in 
the room, even though I officially proposed Opus only as an option to 
vote on).

I suggest anyone considering suggesting G.711 to examine the slides from 
Tim's presentation, and if possible watch that section of the video or 
listen to the audio (which I assume are online).  It wasn't an accident 
that the vote in-room (and there were a LOT of people) was basically 
"Opus only: ~5 votes; G.711 only: 0 or 1 votes; rest of the room: Opus 
and G.711"

-- 
Randell Jesup
randell-ietf@jesup.org