Re: [rtcweb] Video resolution SHOULDs (Re: resolutions in draft-cbran-rtcweb-codec-01)

Harald Alvestrand <harald@alvestrand.no> Tue, 29 November 2011 19:49 UTC

Return-Path: <harald@alvestrand.no>
X-Original-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B979C11E8102 for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 29 Nov 2011 11:49:15 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -109.98
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-109.98 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-8, RCVD_IN_SORBS_WEB=0.619, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id hv2SBxNF+WTV for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 29 Nov 2011 11:49:15 -0800 (PST)
Received: from eikenes.alvestrand.no (eikenes.alvestrand.no [158.38.152.233]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 201C011E8101 for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Tue, 29 Nov 2011 11:49:15 -0800 (PST)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by eikenes.alvestrand.no (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6359739E11A; Tue, 29 Nov 2011 20:49:14 +0100 (CET)
X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at eikenes.alvestrand.no
Received: from eikenes.alvestrand.no ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (eikenes.alvestrand.no [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id yl1XHSdz0PLk; Tue, 29 Nov 2011 20:49:13 +0100 (CET)
Received: from [10.58.91.77] (3-254.197-178.cust.bluewin.ch [178.197.254.3]) by eikenes.alvestrand.no (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6FD0939E082; Tue, 29 Nov 2011 20:49:13 +0100 (CET)
Message-ID: <4ED53736.4030703@alvestrand.no>
Date: Tue, 29 Nov 2011 20:49:10 +0100
From: Harald Alvestrand <harald@alvestrand.no>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.2.23) Gecko/20110921 Thunderbird/3.1.15
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Ralph Giles <giles@thaumas.net>
References: <201111171620.pAHGKK9M016833@mtv-core-3.cisco.com> <CAFA60D4.57C9%cary.bran.standards@gmail.com> <CAEW_Rkv-ToWmNjbuJsVOdEE=P5+s28GUceYDGQ=EcQO3XZz=Vw@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAEW_Rkv-ToWmNjbuJsVOdEE=P5+s28GUceYDGQ=EcQO3XZz=Vw@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: "rtcweb@ietf.org" <rtcweb@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [rtcweb] Video resolution SHOULDs (Re: resolutions in draft-cbran-rtcweb-codec-01)
X-BeenThere: rtcweb@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Real-Time Communication in WEB-browsers working group list <rtcweb.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/rtcweb>
List-Post: <mailto:rtcweb@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 29 Nov 2011 19:49:15 -0000

On 11/29/2011 07:49 PM, Ralph Giles wrote:
> On 29 November 2011 10:30, Bran, Cary<cary.bran.standards@gmail.com>  wrote:
>
>>    o  If VP8, then MUST support a the bilinear and none reconstruction
>>       filters
> s/ a//
>
>>    o  Resolutions of 1920X1080, 1280x720, 720x480,
>>       1024x768, 800x600, 640x480, 640 x 360
>>
>>    o  A PAL resolution of 576 lines."
> I would suggest just adding 720x576 to the list of resolutions.
> There's no reason to single out PAL.
>
> If the NTSC and PAL resolutions are confusing, you could try to say
> something about pixel aspect ratios, interlacing, etc. Not sure if
> that level detail is helpful or not.
Interlace? Just Say No!