IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [rtcweb] VP8 vs H.264 - the core issue

Ted Hardie <ted.ietf@gmail.com> Fri, 25 October 2013 23:23 UTC

Return-Path: <ted.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5CB5C11E80F1 for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 25 Oct 2013 16:23:47 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.521
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.521 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.078, BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, NO_RELAYS=-0.001]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 4WP0BqI5U7vX for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 25 Oct 2013 16:23:46 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-ie0-x22b.google.com (mail-ie0-x22b.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4001:c03::22b]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4237A11E819C for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Fri, 25 Oct 2013 16:23:43 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-ie0-f171.google.com with SMTP id tp5so7425432ieb.2 for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Fri, 25 Oct 2013 16:23:42 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=SXlQ7g7EF1GvcHuMKhDfGsVh0ijnDLmlckUA3tX5+dk=; b=dXwkQTgudPZvrzZ766HBYeXrUvNhjdIjT9BvS8vv72PK6A/74SiOdXIOyvcn4xjSIZ Q+Rf1MQckQLn1xp87Kcg9myrqTh3dx7I7q1Fs8X0ghrJJCJGdYZSVAsMLRTYhYEcWQrp SxrstjSFY2FLOOJJsU6+DTjOzsb7GdljWC8ZaFaVSMRKJrkVooBVxXZ14/c9kOAjKxFa bYy7Et9CpR00Yo+BMvEseEpSWCylM6KkLXh0nO4R0gKo26AtNBS1Cfar5RJkk2rKZBDT WaTi1v7IBzBQTdRGCtCgh+s2Q/boN1x7cm4qsSUzaUKCtuI4t2A9VwdI7ua4jcHhXs4v DjVQ==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.50.120.104 with SMTP id lb8mr557351igb.22.1382743422763; Fri, 25 Oct 2013 16:23:42 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.42.29.202 with HTTP; Fri, 25 Oct 2013 16:23:42 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <526AE703.8000409@bbs.darktech.org>
References: <52681A96.2020904@alvestrand.no> <526826AF.5030308@librevideo.org> <52690090.2050609@alvestrand.no> <BBE9739C2C302046BD34B42713A1E2A22DFCD683@ESESSMB105.ericsson.se> <AE1A6B5FD507DC4FB3C5166F3A05A4843D45DC08@TK5EX14MBXC266.redmond.corp.microsoft.com> <5269764C.4030801@librevideo.org> <52698758.5040404@bbs.darktech.org> <CAD6AjGSb5syh0HO+89fH8cGZ0zqM6gYLPj3aeTRQLN0u8W4cSg@mail.gmail.com> <5269F098.2020904@alvestrand.no> <E44893DD4E290745BB608EB23FDDB7620A0F272E@008-AM1MPN1-043.mgdnok.nokia.com> <949EF20990823C4C85C18D59AA11AD8B0BF358@FR712WXCHMBA11.zeu.alcatel-lucent.com> <CAGgHUiRtXUAJTotAFX7YwQ6cS_OD-MpAb+898c6OYxm7D5xXKw@mail.gmail.com> <FCBEDCB500188C488DA30C874B94F80E1C01158C@xmb-rcd-x03.cisco.com> <CAOJ7v-1iV4_SvToRYYtDZszxkSDF0qmrS4YN8w7OFQ3p29CaDw@mail.gmail.com> <526AE703.8000409@bbs.darktech.org>
Date: Fri, 25 Oct 2013 16:23:42 -0700
Message-ID: <CA+9kkMC=RrmAEyd0uWjpPhvCGuUnj5ATmuZrA7FnAxXhqMJXrg@mail.gmail.com>
From: Ted Hardie <ted.ietf@gmail.com>
To: cowwoc <cowwoc@bbs.darktech.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="047d7bd76bb2878b9304e9990a80"
Cc: "rtcweb@ietf.org" <rtcweb@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [rtcweb] VP8 vs H.264 - the core issue
X-BeenThere: rtcweb@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Real-Time Communication in WEB-browsers working group list <rtcweb.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/rtcweb>
List-Post: <mailto:rtcweb@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 25 Oct 2013 23:23:47 -0000

On Fri, Oct 25, 2013 at 2:47 PM, cowwoc <cowwoc@bbs.darktech.org> wrote:

>
>     From an end-user point of view, the only thing I really care about is
> getting WebRTC support from Microsoft and Apple. Because I view everything
> through that prism, my primary concern is how this decision affects them
> jumping on board.
>

Do you mean "getting WebRTC support from Microsoft and Apple." or "adding
WebRTC support from Microsoft and  Apple to that available from Firefox and
Chrome?"

regards,

Ted Hardie

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email