Re: [rtcweb] Summary of Application Developers' opinions of the current WebRTC API and SDP as a control surface

Roman Shpount <roman@telurix.com> Mon, 08 July 2013 15:37 UTC

Return-Path: <roman@telurix.com>
X-Original-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E730C21F9D17 for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 8 Jul 2013 08:37:49 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.826
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.826 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.150, BAYES_00=-2.599, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id r2Q7ZWluepMz for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 8 Jul 2013 08:37:44 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-wi0-f176.google.com (mail-wi0-f176.google.com [209.85.212.176]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 50BF521F9D28 for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Mon, 8 Jul 2013 08:37:42 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-wi0-f176.google.com with SMTP id ey16so9176035wid.3 for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Mon, 08 Jul 2013 08:37:42 -0700 (PDT)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type:x-gm-message-state; bh=QMVxSm96dBNCzrv3dIEpQJe4sgGr89WOIDVbXghajZ4=; b=Qe6YRAgCANrtaIY3jJirT7Y7YyUd8tUE/FThkMjqSVOlmRUAWeRzBFuHFSQ53qwLUR 2OlGYgkUYajrMx/7GFdkesgGmet1Z9/MW0TJqHVl85MvNZUbdNGd1U4RmFQKo9DI5+hP f8u7jICQYwqrLdyue2P6onL6xxcCILslscypXc0szdN/neWKHEN+6oinbhZEQzSkXsvT b9P02MSljhylTbczeik0HXthUG8f2Q/ejz/EH+AhHD+3NJEebBqFsQbQ0f3eS+ENhxC5 4mfkuqYOPeDL4sgvytBpSZwl9D22HufgwLDDJkf5wQuoVJkVt19FwtzfpVvpfl9tTvSZ JdnA==
X-Received: by 10.180.208.105 with SMTP id md9mr11809841wic.57.1373297862155; Mon, 08 Jul 2013 08:37:42 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-we0-x235.google.com (mail-we0-x235.google.com [2a00:1450:400c:c03::235]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id u9sm24640364wif.6.2013.07.08.08.37.41 for <rtcweb@ietf.org> (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Mon, 08 Jul 2013 08:37:41 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-we0-f181.google.com with SMTP id p58so3670526wes.26 for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Mon, 08 Jul 2013 08:37:40 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.194.119.228 with SMTP id kx4mr12437301wjb.33.1373297860560; Mon, 08 Jul 2013 08:37:40 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.216.221.202 with HTTP; Mon, 8 Jul 2013 08:37:40 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <57A15FAF9E58F841B2B1651FFE16D281057BD4@GENSJZMBX01.msg.int.genesyslab.com>
References: <CAJrXDUGMohpBdi-ft-o_uE7ewFkw7wRY9x7gYEncjov7qi-Bew@mail.gmail.com> <CABcZeBPa4wBS8pYq=0wesMOfL6TkeC7QGAZ8pWwOcnkhkJqWfA@mail.gmail.com> <CAJrXDUFxo8P8wxh8jX3019yPQOuwQ0eVdsFmRXsbWdWinnc5oA@mail.gmail.com> <CABcZeBOTKpmFC34waqZ4kA-P8t+E6yY9gX1JFCHhsBH0+CF-Qw@mail.gmail.com> <1447FA0C20ED5147A1AA0EF02890A64B1C30BC0F@ESESSMB209.ericsson.se> <CAD5OKxtKLMf_d=8GSMrqfNhDHPe9MFP2ZTKzZHFn9CyMr-gSVQ@mail.gmail.com> <1447FA0C20ED5147A1AA0EF02890A64B1C30C833@ESESSMB209.ericsson.se> <CAD5OKxvGfkgRp6tXwbOu_kVteHiBBqsyR5ixH18FMKjCNGO8VQ@mail.gmail.com> <57A15FAF9E58F841B2B1651FFE16D281057BD4@GENSJZMBX01.msg.int.genesyslab.com>
Date: Mon, 8 Jul 2013 11:37:40 -0400
Message-ID: <CAD5OKxuBmZxvDXD2Doc-7HH2sSK2neZH7v-W2XS_R+RTBkwveA@mail.gmail.com>
From: Roman Shpount <roman@telurix.com>
To: Jim Barnett <Jim.Barnett@genesyslab.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=089e012292e2264e8504e101d3d1
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQnaraeN+DA5b2ICE0DGuE+42ZMmPCzYbGBfRHvV9mMels4USpZvcSa9lWyuqNi4nYtY+2BF
Cc: "<rtcweb@ietf.org>" <rtcweb@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [rtcweb] Summary of Application Developers' opinions of the current WebRTC API and SDP as a control surface
X-BeenThere: rtcweb@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Real-Time Communication in WEB-browsers working group list <rtcweb.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/rtcweb>
List-Post: <mailto:rtcweb@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 08 Jul 2013 15:37:50 -0000

On Mon, Jul 8, 2013 at 11:29 AM, Jim Barnett <Jim.Barnett@genesyslab.com>wrote:

>  As I recall the consensus, developers are supposed to be able to modify
> the SDP, but we needed to specify what parts of the SDP could be modified.
>  In other words, there might be some limits to what could be modified, but
> we haven’t yet determined/agreed on what they are.****
>
>
>
This is exactly what I thought.
_____________
Roman Shpount