IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [rtcweb] Remote recording - RTC-Web client acting as SIPREC session recording client

Olle E Johansson <oej@edvina.net> Tue, 23 August 2011 15:39 UTC

Return-Path: <oej@edvina.net>
X-Original-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A5E4121F8B0D for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 23 Aug 2011 08:39:01 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.248
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.248 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.000, BAYES_00=-2.599, HELO_EQ_SE=0.35, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id A2v5zEg-rCHE for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 23 Aug 2011 08:39:01 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtp6.webway.se (smtp2.webway.se [87.96.134.128]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0E5B621F8B0C for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Tue, 23 Aug 2011 08:38:59 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.40.24] (ns.webway.se [87.96.134.125]) by smtp6.webway.se (Postfix) with ESMTP id B5E27552C41; Tue, 23 Aug 2011 15:40:06 +0000 (UTC)
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1244.3)
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail=_53FB5EFF-D96F-466F-8156-B780EB2801D7"
From: Olle E Johansson <oej@edvina.net>
In-Reply-To: <89177AB2-F721-47E4-8471-2180EDA10615@voxeo.com>
Date: Tue, 23 Aug 2011 17:40:06 +0200
Message-Id: <6C3639CD-E547-470A-8328-AF717BB8C32F@edvina.net>
References: <A444A0F8084434499206E78C106220CA0B00FDB08B@MCHP058A.global-ad.net> <89177AB2-F721-47E4-8471-2180EDA10615@voxeo.com>
To: Dan York <dyork@voxeo.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1244.3)
Cc: "rtcweb@ietf.org" <rtcweb@ietf.org>, "public-webrtc@w3.org" <public-webrtc@w3.org>
Subject: Re: [rtcweb] Remote recording - RTC-Web client acting as SIPREC session recording client
X-BeenThere: rtcweb@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Real-Time Communication in WEB-browsers working group list <rtcweb.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/rtcweb>
List-Post: <mailto:rtcweb@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 23 Aug 2011 15:39:01 -0000

23 aug 2011 kl. 17:23 skrev Dan York:

> The more complicated we make it - or the more requirements we impose on browsers - the less adoption we'll see.
> 
Which we've proven with the large amount of RFCs and drafts for SIP.

We need to be very careful here. 

+1 and "like" on Dan's mail.

/O

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email