Re: [rtcweb] I-D Action: draft-ietf-rtcweb-data-channel-07.txt

I suggest that this just be called "Data Channel", not "WebRTC Data 
Channel". (Or pick some other neutral name - perhaps SCTP Data Channel.)

This won't be used solely for WebRTC. (It seems weird for two sip-based 
implementations of CLUE to be using a *WebRTC* Data Channel to talk to 
one another.)

(But it would still make sense for the JS API to have a WebRTC-specific 
name.)

	Thanks,
	Paul

On 2/11/14 1:15 PM, Christer Holmberg wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Section 6 describes the characteristics of the data channel.
>
> However, the section name is "The Usage of SCTP in the WebRTC Context".
>
> I think we should rename that to something like "The Usage of SCTP for the WebRTC Data Channel".
>
> Because, the definition of the channel is the same no matter in which context it is used :)
>
> Regards,
>
> Christer
>
> _______________________________________________
> rtcweb mailing list
> rtcweb@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb
>

Re: [rtcweb] I-D Action: draft-ietf-rtcweb-data-channel-07.txt - Comment on section 6 title