Re: [rtcweb] Alternative decision process in RTCWeb

cowwoc <cowwoc@bbs.darktech.org> Tue, 03 December 2013 15:57 UTC

Return-Path: <cowwoc@bbs.darktech.org>
X-Original-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 99A941A1F4C for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 3 Dec 2013 07:57:37 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.6
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id eOGguY8eKcJp for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 3 Dec 2013 07:57:35 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-ie0-f180.google.com (mail-ie0-f180.google.com [209.85.223.180]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B4BF41AE15C for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Tue, 3 Dec 2013 07:57:32 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-ie0-f180.google.com with SMTP id tp5so24092855ieb.11 for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Tue, 03 Dec 2013 07:57:30 -0800 (PST)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to :subject:references:in-reply-to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=o9qiNvXUqEjcCfFnjqPimrB4/0UqGDK1tOUv3u6ktNE=; b=aaTK404d6hK3dq6jMHUvD7dnJWq0C4ypptXZ46x+e8LLW5MpwPlEzAc9QwvFfpSWZi nf6+NFeIwsszSMchudNE07v/0jRVhU+VrLkWUShM2WKE42SxDzGPVfwBQ920iq+/I3KP AoLlQJMz22ZYXPntN3p2Sz1a1eTWSqkjLsp/a96sRKS5YllbYmLEHm1Qy/NGsKKuGR/X qSAD2YeSFGLXJUocWS4HkfA7x64J8AIFof+riFJ7DGK4E5sojfqWxWozfxndC5qwP7HV 9dN/XC49qtTacaZ1dSypn3bBpFiG4PmVYDvlPZ/4iQneJ8dp+RUJkANlL3kQsdfoGkF4 U/SQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQlpy2e/H8QDVHwF9o3OGN34x8lgPy3lJvlyNM3KHoEszE9sSR/hz+Z6C5j3eJ0t5Ry9+H0k
X-Received: by 10.42.42.132 with SMTP id t4mr235735ice.90.1386086249087; Tue, 03 Dec 2013 07:57:29 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [192.168.1.100] (206-248-171-209.dsl.teksavvy.com. [206.248.171.209]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id v2sm3701277igz.3.2013.12.03.07.57.27 for <multiple recipients> (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Tue, 03 Dec 2013 07:57:28 -0800 (PST)
Message-ID: <529DFF66.4080308@bbs.darktech.org>
Date: Tue, 03 Dec 2013 10:57:26 -0500
From: cowwoc <cowwoc@bbs.darktech.org>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.1.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Max Jonas Werner <mail@makk.es>, rtcweb@ietf.org
References: <DUB127-W23531D0E8B15570331DB51E0EE0@phx.gbl> <52974AA8.6080702@cisco.com> <1F79045E-8CD0-4C5D-9090-3E82853E62E9@nominum.com> <52976F56.4020706@dcrocker.net> <3CD78695-47AD-4CDF-B486-3949FFDC107B@nominum.com> <5006.1385666853@sandelman.ca> <D4D5920A-E041-42E8-BB1C-1CB24FBEE3F4@nominum.com> <BLU169-W1176AB7AECF0757C380A70E93EE0@phx.gbl> <20131129060936.GV3245@audi.shelbyville.oz> <6mkp9912042i9gkg87fc3ji8g9tkv6uqrh@hive.bjoern.hoehrmann.de> <529CEAA6.9000501@librevideo.org> <e5bq99dg3h6e82mnsn6k21aunc9eqlvc7q@hive.bjoern.hoehrmann.de> <529D4617.6060909@bbs.darktech.org> <529DDE37.6020202@makk.es>
In-Reply-To: <529DDE37.6020202@makk.es>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: Re: [rtcweb] Alternative decision process in RTCWeb
X-BeenThere: rtcweb@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Real-Time Communication in WEB-browsers working group list <rtcweb.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/rtcweb/>
List-Post: <mailto:rtcweb@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 03 Dec 2013 15:57:37 -0000

On 03/12/2013 8:35 AM, Max Jonas Werner wrote:
> On 03.12.2013 03:46, cowwoc wrote:
> [...]
>> Bjoern,
>>
>> I'd like to point you to http://www.netindex.com/upload/allcountries/
>> for two reasons:
>>
>>   1. It states that Germany has an average upload rate of 3.13Mbps.
> This statement does not say anything about the upload rate of the
> majority of users.

The source data is here: http://www.netindex.com/source-data/

It should be possible to calculate the median from there.

>>   2. It shows that upload speeds are increasing over time.
> Probably, but they are still extremely low in comparison to the
> downstream rate.

Why does that matter?

Thanks,
Gili