IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [rtcweb] Form of the video codec question

"Cullen Jennings (fluffy)" <fluffy@cisco.com> Tue, 30 October 2012 13:08 UTC

Return-Path: <fluffy@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8B88521F8521 for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 30 Oct 2012 06:08:44 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -110.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-110.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-8, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 051Mh36tdo8H for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 30 Oct 2012 06:08:42 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rcdn-iport-5.cisco.com (rcdn-iport-5.cisco.com [173.37.86.76]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7823C21F84DB for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Tue, 30 Oct 2012 06:08:42 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=417; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1351602522; x=1352812122; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:references: in-reply-to:content-id:content-transfer-encoding: mime-version; bh=F2FluWws5CxhaVH7c2AwhNnunZtIjFL8b7Oe7c+QsIg=; b=Y4mWxq6qJqokR/6Ou9/ui6JcJQ0jtuzwrV0DVXtg23DJtITi38zCsUi+ sjBnPz2U5eNqJTJX9FbJuFVH5Dx2XBJo8D70q7YunmmzpTJl12G2AaPFf RjLg7d11QffTPSH2qMp6Rd7HY67/lIPEJb2Vw1ZshQgu/ZJLwFjoQUiO0 M=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AggFABjRj1CtJV2d/2dsb2JhbABEhVG9ZIEIgh8BAQQSASc/EAIBCCIUEDIlAgQOBQgah2ScZI9nkDSLdYV8YQOkS4Frgm+CGQ
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.80,679,1344211200"; d="scan'208";a="136881255"
Received: from rcdn-core-6.cisco.com ([173.37.93.157]) by rcdn-iport-5.cisco.com with ESMTP; 30 Oct 2012 13:08:41 +0000
Received: from xhc-aln-x10.cisco.com (xhc-aln-x10.cisco.com [173.36.12.84]) by rcdn-core-6.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id q9UD8fYR021062 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=FAIL); Tue, 30 Oct 2012 13:08:41 GMT
Received: from xmb-aln-x02.cisco.com ([169.254.5.217]) by xhc-aln-x10.cisco.com ([173.36.12.84]) with mapi id 14.02.0318.001; Tue, 30 Oct 2012 08:08:41 -0500
From: "Cullen Jennings (fluffy)" <fluffy@cisco.com>
To: "Markus.Isomaki@nokia.com" <Markus.Isomaki@nokia.com>
Thread-Topic: [rtcweb] Form of the video codec question
Thread-Index: AQHNtgBgustyiUGYLkmbajL4vzYFSpfQ9K8AgAEJpwCAAClpgA==
Date: Tue, 30 Oct 2012 13:08:41 +0000
Message-ID: <C5E08FE080ACFD4DAE31E4BDBF944EB1118A8265@xmb-aln-x02.cisco.com>
References: <CA+9kkMCQBw27XwvZ=hARs1DyyQufY2H7R4FwYq-3P-Tp7T7W+w@mail.gmail.com> <FDBFA77C7400C74F87BC297393B53E352595FBA9@BY2PRD0710MB354.namprd07.prod.outlook.com> <E44893DD4E290745BB608EB23FDDB7622F3B70@008-AM1MPN1-041.mgdnok.nokia.com>
In-Reply-To: <E44893DD4E290745BB608EB23FDDB7622F3B70@008-AM1MPN1-041.mgdnok.nokia.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.61.101.110]
x-tm-as-product-ver: SMEX-10.2.0.1135-7.000.1014-19320.004
x-tm-as-result: No--29.494400-8.000000-31
x-tm-as-user-approved-sender: No
x-tm-as-user-blocked-sender: No
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-ID: <481E76B3FB98B24F8A31096A7374A3B8@cisco.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Cc: "<rtcweb@ietf.org>" <rtcweb@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [rtcweb] Form of the video codec question
X-BeenThere: rtcweb@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Real-Time Communication in WEB-browsers working group list <rtcweb.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/rtcweb>
List-Post: <mailto:rtcweb@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 30 Oct 2012 13:08:44 -0000

On Oct 30, 2012, at 11:42 , Markus.Isomaki@nokia.com wrote:

> 
> * Raise your hand if you think the WG must decide on at least one MTI video codec (at this time)
> * Raise your hand if you think the WG should give up on MTI video codec (for now) and focus on making progress in other areas  

Agree this is critical but we took that previously and there was consensus for a MTI video codec.

v2.31.3 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status