Re: [rtcweb] The Voting Process

Roman Shpount <roman@telurix.com> Wed, 27 November 2013 18:13 UTC

Return-Path: <roman@telurix.com>
X-Original-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5D6861ADE85 for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 27 Nov 2013 10:13:39 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.957
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.957 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MISSING_HEADERS=1.021, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id JkvAnseu9gQ2 for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 27 Nov 2013 10:13:38 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-wg0-f47.google.com (mail-wg0-f47.google.com [74.125.82.47]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0323A1ADDAC for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Wed, 27 Nov 2013 10:13:37 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-wg0-f47.google.com with SMTP id n12so5983664wgh.26 for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Wed, 27 Nov 2013 10:13:36 -0800 (PST)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:cc:content-type; bh=hzI8/E8MRwI4S15MSnoVW+CjVW7qjDfP5aHHzVw5zGA=; b=A7RpwEUh64Zk8apk1VJ3QxuCTsO9cNCY7EIhXsWqnTFdZqugzQDRAKnfEGpKvOr/CR TXIaxU4p5beemVJVPswIwUGwk3QnP1Bxls0T4F3Szzj388pAMKDnSenTO3uHj9+BWqhS E+ECCP1DbK/ghEUFznafHkq5hf6ELTnqOd0eFOyTWsxq+2MNaLeOv6IxrXYmtcjPbhVV I1bl6gsEguIuUrcofQw8gckmNZPeZuFTLrsIud4Ol94NuCdlTAoIDMt2JxIOifD4b6cS 2NfS1XKMED5D8BWVvUTik21lJSeIV0XJ43KTdlrPEytbsDAMO8UVaTcZatT7SOcf5jY9 0J4A==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQnQkXZBb0Fg7UcaCuptb7mSMm91dap/062Z6izQsOBVeALZ/1B9bFEiqrgfAAVqdzqRNZM8
X-Received: by 10.180.210.130 with SMTP id mu2mr24078072wic.61.1385576016785; Wed, 27 Nov 2013 10:13:36 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-we0-f178.google.com (mail-we0-f178.google.com [74.125.82.178]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id b7sm73514634wiz.8.2013.11.27.10.13.35 for <rtcweb@ietf.org> (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Wed, 27 Nov 2013 10:13:35 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-we0-f178.google.com with SMTP id u57so1472532wes.23 for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Wed, 27 Nov 2013 10:13:35 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.194.1.139 with SMTP id 11mr15986930wjm.33.1385576015122; Wed, 27 Nov 2013 10:13:35 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.217.88.133 with HTTP; Wed, 27 Nov 2013 10:13:35 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <49D33D9F-BC65-4AE8-B98A-04D3C170F644@phonefromhere.com>
References: <52935C89.5040408@ericsson.com> <CAGgHUiQnkQKkc-ptMu6DtfUYJY6N9i7PUaeAqKxp96nB2MQBGA@mail.gmail.com> <52936207.5040704@ericsson.com> <E44893DD4E290745BB608EB23FDDB7620A13302B@008-AM1MPN1-041.mgdnok.nokia.com> <5295B273.1060305@ericsson.com> <C5B67CF6-44C2-44ED-A087-67D9737870AD@gmail.com> <5295F718.9010603@ericsson.com> <20131127175414.GA87911@verdi> <49D33D9F-BC65-4AE8-B98A-04D3C170F644@phonefromhere.com>
Date: Wed, 27 Nov 2013 13:13:35 -0500
Message-ID: <CAD5OKxshm+izp7N_2+rst_hfSCAccddgT-u7KRvbxJz6t5m+0A@mail.gmail.com>
From: Roman Shpount <roman@telurix.com>
Cc: "rtcweb@ietf.org" <rtcweb@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=047d7b3a8c3030d92504ec2c8ed7
Subject: Re: [rtcweb] The Voting Process
X-BeenThere: rtcweb@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Real-Time Communication in WEB-browsers working group list <rtcweb.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/rtcweb/>
List-Post: <mailto:rtcweb@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 27 Nov 2013 18:13:39 -0000

I am not sure about the rest of the group but from my point of view the
proposed process clearly shows that IETF in general and this group in
particular is not equipped to vote. I also strongly disagree that voting
would produce a MTI video codec decision which would meaningful in any way.
We need a way to find consensus regarding the MTI or drop the whole MTI
idea (which would also require consensus).
_____________
Roman Shpount