Re: [rtcweb] On babies and bathwater (was Re: Summary of Application Developers' opinions of the current WebRTC API and SDP as a control surface)

Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com> Fri, 19 July 2013 17:37 UTC

Return-Path: <martin.thomson@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 79AC721E8100 for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 19 Jul 2013 10:37:22 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.296
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.296 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.304, BAYES_00=-2.599, NO_RELAYS=-0.001]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id On4uFbxnWPr1 for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 19 Jul 2013 10:37:22 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-we0-x22d.google.com (mail-we0-x22d.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c03::22d]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D3AC421E80DF for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Fri, 19 Jul 2013 10:37:21 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-we0-f173.google.com with SMTP id x54so4315364wes.32 for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Fri, 19 Jul 2013 10:37:21 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=r4mbcoU2txfazp+OtA/lotXwudELebD+nA3UPXra8P4=; b=KuqCqfHlNH+jfe4YBjDCez7YhUWEhKfpdLdPVyXmjn23wiedF5Kj6AxZNTqSBL4OoG blcxwI0oEli42DpWu8HA2JOqX3YgQPoziTCa6QK967Q5akwe5OaYT0LznCARgglk8D9U Lj3aHSeycJFIyoPE7YI24XECNRYRyur9u1Uj/FbNre++3JCA7ghhbjvS68RDPhNXcVUf tlS8saS4Xo1i+IGbgd38qxH1x1AkBxbwpsNciHzW+m4xH0EbDm6ID61crxVFOgifmFmD HQMYLd2NngYFKWL5v17fcBiMsiIaffhxC7Gu4ugmRmvWbKA/8bTfY/lZoNA5hTCMXgvw EQlQ==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.180.73.68 with SMTP id j4mr23535892wiv.10.1374255440956; Fri, 19 Jul 2013 10:37:20 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.194.60.46 with HTTP; Fri, 19 Jul 2013 10:37:20 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <51E978C2.8000002@nostrum.com>
References: <CAJrXDUGMohpBdi-ft-o_uE7ewFkw7wRY9x7gYEncjov7qi-Bew@mail.gmail.com> <CABcZeBPa4wBS8pYq=0wesMOfL6TkeC7QGAZ8pWwOcnkhkJqWfA@mail.gmail.com> <CAJrXDUFxo8P8wxh8jX3019yPQOuwQ0eVdsFmRXsbWdWinnc5oA@mail.gmail.com> <CABcZeBOTKpmFC34waqZ4kA-P8t+E6yY9gX1JFCHhsBH0+CF-Qw@mail.gmail.com> <1447FA0C20ED5147A1AA0EF02890A64B1C30BC0F@ESESSMB209.ericsson.se> <CAD5OKxtKLMf_d=8GSMrqfNhDHPe9MFP2ZTKzZHFn9CyMr-gSVQ@mail.gmail.com> <1447FA0C20ED5147A1AA0EF02890A64B1C30C833@ESESSMB209.ericsson.se> <CAD5OKxvGfkgRp6tXwbOu_kVteHiBBqsyR5ixH18FMKjCNGO8VQ@mail.gmail.com> <1447FA0C20ED5147A1AA0EF02890A64B1C30CD1E@ESESSMB209.ericsson.se> <BLU401-EAS386F88B3FE140492B39B59693610@phx.gbl> <AE1A6B5FD507DC4FB3C5166F3A05A484213E41E7@TK5EX14MBXC265.redmond.corp.microsoft.com> <C50FDAD5-492C-4A83-AD6D-464242FB4A05@iii.ca> <CALiegfneUj=kzDjR_E1=S-bqAajaPUE3f_A2g8oGriFyPhamPA@mail.gmail.com> <51E96B5B.2050302@nostrum.com> <CAD5OKxsgSoRg=OcAKLWZpQNzseW5oSHimoa83LHXegZad4i=sA@mail.gmail.com> <51E978C2.8000002@nostrum.com>
Date: Fri, 19 Jul 2013 10:37:20 -0700
Message-ID: <CABkgnnW=K6nUc3GKJcbYy8YNChPLem39+N9_Dzr45NG7yjaAHQ@mail.gmail.com>
From: Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>
To: Adam Roach <adam@nostrum.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Cc: "<rtcweb@ietf.org>" <rtcweb@ietf.org>, "public-webrtc@w3.org" <public-webrtc@w3.org>
Subject: Re: [rtcweb] On babies and bathwater (was Re: Summary of Application Developers' opinions of the current WebRTC API and SDP as a control surface)
X-BeenThere: rtcweb@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Real-Time Communication in WEB-browsers working group list <rtcweb.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/rtcweb>
List-Post: <mailto:rtcweb@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 19 Jul 2013 17:37:22 -0000

On 19 July 2013 10:34, Adam Roach <adam@nostrum.com>; wrote:
> On 7/19/13 12:29, Roman Shpount wrote:
>>
>> First of all, a lot of the issues you are talking about are not yet
>> solved.
>
> That was my *point*.

So what, the logical conclusion is to tell people that are working on
(or have proposed) solutions to go away because they don't fit with
your preconceptions about what a solution should look like?