IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [rtcweb] OPS-Dir review of draft-ietf-rtcweb-stun-consent-freshness-13

"Tirumaleswar Reddy (tireddy)" <tireddy@cisco.com> Thu, 28 May 2015 10:54 UTC

Return-Path: <tireddy@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F025B1A88FD for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 28 May 2015 03:54:20 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -14.511
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-14.511 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id kOKZFrvIuE8W for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 28 May 2015 03:54:19 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from alln-iport-7.cisco.com (alln-iport-7.cisco.com [173.37.142.94]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7C4E31A88F1 for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Thu, 28 May 2015 03:54:19 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=1467; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1432810460; x=1434020060; h=from:to:subject:date:message-id:references:in-reply-to: content-transfer-encoding:mime-version; bh=Ar3XhJJ5b0lUG+uKSZ4iUo4K4EshbSXDL/M7wTUErBs=; b=Fm8J9Q3horlr4JR+n5QFDUAYQgyjsnwJ/Gisi8SpQM0E+D0rhWgtjmOR W8BJTNfXfPmzgKguiT+KWYsxuvxSbxjGhOA9E9ND28WGozI4kKPX/QbVo PybqioC8hGDR30vUgWaDkHGVhz5Kqw5572ogcsapoDIS5/8MvVR1dW1Lx 0=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: A0AUBACl8mZV/4ENJK1cgxBUXga/GWYJgVAKhS1KAoFROBQBAQEBAQEBgQqEIgEBAQQBAQE3NBcEAgEIEQQBAQsUCQcnCxQJCAEBBAESCIglDdQcAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBEwSLOoRUOAaDEYEWBZMIhwSFNINxkhUjYYMXb4FGgQEBAQE
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.13,512,1427760000"; d="scan'208";a="153983689"
Received: from alln-core-9.cisco.com ([173.36.13.129]) by alln-iport-7.cisco.com with ESMTP; 28 May 2015 10:54:19 +0000
Received: from xhc-aln-x14.cisco.com (xhc-aln-x14.cisco.com [173.36.12.88]) by alln-core-9.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id t4SAsIrY002545 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=FAIL); Thu, 28 May 2015 10:54:18 GMT
Received: from xmb-rcd-x10.cisco.com ([169.254.15.253]) by xhc-aln-x14.cisco.com ([173.36.12.88]) with mapi id 14.03.0195.001; Thu, 28 May 2015 05:54:18 -0500
From: "Tirumaleswar Reddy (tireddy)" <tireddy@cisco.com>
To: Harald Alvestrand <harald@alvestrand.no>, "rtcweb@ietf.org" <rtcweb@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [rtcweb] OPS-Dir review of draft-ietf-rtcweb-stun-consent-freshness-13
Thread-Index: AdCZEAkgUwawg8/yQZKvd0M2cshTwQATeM6AAApZRWA=
Date: Thu, 28 May 2015 10:54:18 +0000
Message-ID: <913383AAA69FF945B8F946018B75898A47860AA6@xmb-rcd-x10.cisco.com>
References: <913383AAA69FF945B8F946018B75898A478607D3@xmb-rcd-x10.cisco.com> <5566F2CB.8050205@alvestrand.no>
In-Reply-To: <5566F2CB.8050205@alvestrand.no>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [173.39.64.120]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/rtcweb/RCQZHC9zND2Qqrlv4u9OlKp74B8>
Subject: Re: [rtcweb] OPS-Dir review of draft-ietf-rtcweb-stun-consent-freshness-13
X-BeenThere: rtcweb@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Real-Time Communication in WEB-browsers working group list <rtcweb.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/rtcweb/>
List-Post: <mailto:rtcweb@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 28 May 2015 10:54:21 -0000

> -----Original Message-----
> From: rtcweb [mailto:rtcweb-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Harald
> Alvestrand
> Sent: Thursday, May 28, 2015 4:20 PM
> To: rtcweb@ietf.org
> Subject: Re: [rtcweb] OPS-Dir review of draft-ietf-rtcweb-stun-consent-
> freshness-13
> 
> Den 28. mai 2015 08:32, skrev Tirumaleswar Reddy (tireddy):
> >> > Please add a sentence to summarize ICE-lite, not just the reference.
> > NEW:
> > ICE-lite agent defined in section 2.7 of [RFC5245] does not generate
> connectivity
> >    checks or runs the ICE state machine, it only needs to be able to
> >    respond to connectivity checks.  Hence an ICE-lite implementation
> >    will not generate consent checks, but will just respond to consent
> >    checks it receives.  No changes are required to ICE-lite
> >    implementations in order to respond to consent checks, as they are
> >    processed as normal ICE connectivity checks.
> >
> >> >
> 
> Grammar stickler:
> 
> "An ICE-lite agent, as defined in section 2.7 of [RFC5245], does not
> generate connectivity check or run the ICE state machine".
> 
> .... "Hence an ICE-lite agent will not ..."
> 
> I think the second occurence of "implementation" is OK, but the first
> one really needs to be "agent".

Thanks, fixed in my local copy.

-Tiru
> 
> _______________________________________________
> rtcweb mailing list
> rtcweb@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email