Re: [rtcweb] AVPF vs AVP

Magnus Westerlund <magnus.westerlund@ericsson.com> Fri, 16 September 2011 13:30 UTC

Return-Path: <magnus.westerlund@ericsson.com>
X-Original-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A862721F8C1B for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 16 Sep 2011 06:30:06 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -106.504
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-106.504 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.095, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id P-P6hW9j4xsq for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 16 Sep 2011 06:30:06 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mailgw10.se.ericsson.net (mailgw10.se.ericsson.net [193.180.251.61]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DEF7421F8C07 for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Fri, 16 Sep 2011 06:30:05 -0700 (PDT)
X-AuditID: c1b4fb3d-b7c47ae000000b17-4b-4e734fe34f2a
Received: from esessmw0191.eemea.ericsson.se (Unknown_Domain [153.88.253.125]) by mailgw10.se.ericsson.net (Symantec Mail Security) with SMTP id 06.60.02839.3EF437E4; Fri, 16 Sep 2011 15:32:19 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (153.88.115.8) by esessmw0191.eemea.ericsson.se (153.88.115.85) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 8.3.137.0; Fri, 16 Sep 2011 15:32:18 +0200
Message-ID: <4E734FE0.9030404@ericsson.com>
Date: Fri, 16 Sep 2011 15:32:16 +0200
From: Magnus Westerlund <magnus.westerlund@ericsson.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; rv:6.0.2) Gecko/20110902 Thunderbird/6.0.2
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Roni Even <ron.even.tlv@gmail.com>
References: <4E70C387.1070707@ericsson.com> <4e73497a.280d440a.69d0.ffff9f98@mx.google.com>
In-Reply-To: <4e73497a.280d440a.69d0.ffff9f98@mx.google.com>
X-Enigmail-Version: 1.3.1
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Brightmail-Tracker: AAAAAA==
Cc: "rtcweb@ietf.org" <rtcweb@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [rtcweb] AVPF vs AVP
X-BeenThere: rtcweb@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Real-Time Communication in WEB-browsers working group list <rtcweb.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/rtcweb>
List-Post: <mailto:rtcweb@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 16 Sep 2011 13:30:06 -0000

On 2011-09-16 15:03, Roni Even wrote:
> Magnus,
> Maybe we can take the approach from
> draft-holmberg-mmusic-sdp-multiplex-negotiation and offer the same m-line
> with the same port number twice, one as AVP and one as AVPF and let the
> other side chose, he can answer with a port=0 for the profile it does not
> want. If the multiplex proposal has backward interoperability than this
> proposal also does.

An idea with potential I would say. I have to think if it has any
issues. We may still have missed some aspect when it comes to Christer's
draft which breaks it.

Cheers

Magnus Westerlund

----------------------------------------------------------------------
Multimedia Technologies, Ericsson Research EAB/TVM
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Ericsson AB                | Phone  +46 10 7148287
Färögatan 6                | Mobile +46 73 0949079
SE-164 80 Stockholm, Sweden| mailto: magnus.westerlund@ericsson.com
----------------------------------------------------------------------