IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [rtcweb] Is rtcweb the right place for draft-ietf-rtcweb-mdns-ice-candidates?

Justin Uberti <juberti@google.com> Wed, 14 August 2019 22:18 UTC

Return-Path: <juberti@google.com>
X-Original-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B7EF81208E3 for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 14 Aug 2019 15:18:21 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -17.499
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-17.499 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_MED=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, ENV_AND_HDR_SPF_MATCH=-0.5, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5, USER_IN_DEF_SPF_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=google.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id kxLOPubc0NlS for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 14 Aug 2019 15:18:19 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-vs1-xe2f.google.com (mail-vs1-xe2f.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::e2f]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A770A120F14 for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Wed, 14 Aug 2019 15:18:19 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-vs1-xe2f.google.com with SMTP id i7so380406vsp.0 for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Wed, 14 Aug 2019 15:18:19 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=HRoC/KcSrGAXRzVUWIsfglfz1g1pTaAa68D91AAqBAQ=; b=qowVQYnZD2K9IMCwWNgkkaL1S5ZXMkBvC+yuCukx3qw7LyCjujyOWOSGNqlRk8UsZe vB50x1iWMYqvClBUecTiPC/EL45hV0A0K9rK+VEf9wthhZ5jxxWiGbTTqdv6b0/UeImT xF21ypHG0yO33E5bUelp1YaDpZSI7US5eIcVwxbOS4WdfDd7yZ7LDMa79AaVXWOved6v SE+Oh8EeVWZlFFQafBirSrchD4hcQK1h7stUf4VRPFYutxvE0r9FqXg7nCiZen4xA9IC zwzbpKd9QHbyDw7iq5M74eRBGkhJKH3kNv0yPc9nXgPyGl3N95WFxrtTi4vp0f90Egje wcMg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=HRoC/KcSrGAXRzVUWIsfglfz1g1pTaAa68D91AAqBAQ=; b=Rq7G6EA2NRodnrl0I305JswYQzclnfisptQvRH8M7yNOOQxnUUQ2SzINYP0ZsCR+Cs RwMRME/LFIy9VKjvxTdWMOJEwBEkyXNr4iprQ6oRnUkdiVnr/h7ja51fkgFYpNQmXpsM 4BOcna/8k17qSophh28mRIIil6lvJm0r5RGErwTZjRjAPZR1vDcJ9TGOyb5B/8R9Ph1n Y1RzBXdV/wlTsXkXFWZ90zrzgyHBJUqek9ZvhBCsq52fIgqjADvmc8vhxYOytLVGwQ5G hTHPmhkqBMUnyOqdm9VD6C2TbAzJWKObh1Y7Ouz4e7xX5UAuwYeYk8S/xtXcqquPy3fb CkWA==
X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAWZ+5oHK9H6iYj124LyNbgfpeA27wvNuymmLIeNYS0fiO+1T+9f NOJN8RGdho+gQTAF/Vm+YT5UGSebxU9XZlt534qw+1bdAOFIrg==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqw3l5200I60NCoerdPD3Ihvcd2JV3vrysUqKeDj7UbzbGvVvhJX4gLZ1KM3ZEogCgF3ZZWy5gJajcQTeNmHF+s=
X-Received: by 2002:a67:ff0a:: with SMTP id v10mr1609254vsp.1.1565821098038; Wed, 14 Aug 2019 15:18:18 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <b03853a4-1006-4da0-d52f-9e7462a2cd0c@alvestrand.no> <D80CECAF-B520-40A2-BFBB-E39B73BA943D@sn3rd.com> <CAD5OKxsd-SE8VpwFgto3DLbabs+9O+cHMucy1+Cep7tCJQR6+w@mail.gmail.com> <CAOJ7v-2XrND6YWqo2tEiDbs7TZpEoiP+MGBAk2aF7hfoMiGk0Q@mail.gmail.com> <CAD5OKxtSzOfnN8WrV-duwwfmwa+VJX_3HACiXU43Xeym25GQaQ@mail.gmail.com> <CAOJ7v-1pKuvNfuPVqJQKj1d0U8Z7JH9aqNU0DkNDMYvec7jyUQ@mail.gmail.com> <40E6F158-7AA1-42AD-9D18-1B4C335ECD64@mozilla.com> <CAOJ7v-2CWAX0W02qdRes3G-_5hiWGhWEdLhregO-nb1m2EDZZQ@mail.gmail.com> <CAD5OKxu3sCBaN3MmWmeawuYB-sPqfZt6TqF=dSfs6Q0QdXNYKg@mail.gmail.com> <c6649705-465e-0d7e-1a8b-d93b3867cdb4@alvestrand.no> <CAD5OKxsZtgtWK19jJB4kRDDqZ1NzR9-78fRjgVwJALLFPLRASw@mail.gmail.com> <dee38d45-5561-7e9c-0f48-f0c69ec71403@alvestrand.no> <CAD5OKxtfv5pu3TuE=B=Wq=eni1q_Ch2cwFfYW46nk4Na1MALtQ@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAD5OKxtfv5pu3TuE=B=Wq=eni1q_Ch2cwFfYW46nk4Na1MALtQ@mail.gmail.com>
From: Justin Uberti <juberti@google.com>
Date: Wed, 14 Aug 2019 15:18:06 -0700
Message-ID: <CAOJ7v-0w9miEm-TyfL+F5ttFyx-3XBbDB9eHZCwpF+n_mjEeKA@mail.gmail.com>
To: Roman Shpount <roman@telurix.com>
Cc: RTCWeb IETF <rtcweb@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="00000000000055158405901b22a2"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/rtcweb/RHEcEDi6el-W3Dpkqks1GkHEojI>
Subject: Re: [rtcweb] Is rtcweb the right place for draft-ietf-rtcweb-mdns-ice-candidates?
X-BeenThere: rtcweb@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Real-Time Communication in WEB-browsers working group list <rtcweb.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/rtcweb/>
List-Post: <mailto:rtcweb@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 14 Aug 2019 22:18:22 -0000

My understanding is that draft-ietf-rtcweb-mdns-ice-candidates is going to
be AD sponsored.

On Wed, Aug 14, 2019 at 2:21 PM Roman Shpount <roman@telurix.com> wrote:

> Hi All,
>
> Since RTCWEB is closed, I am going to ask once again: Should we
> move draft-ietf-rtcweb-mdns-ice-candidates to mmusic?
>
> I know people are unhappy with mmusic draft development speed, but if
> enough people participate, we should be able to complete mdns draft quickly
> and potentially develop an additional draft which will clarify generic FQDN
> candidate processing procedures.
>
> Thank You,
> _____________
> Roman Shpount
>
>
> On Sun, Jul 7, 2019 at 3:47 AM Harald Alvestrand <harald@alvestrand.no>
> wrote:
>
>> On 7/6/19 10:15 PM, Roman Shpount wrote:
>>
>>
>> Given mmusic's traditional processing speed, I am not sure there's any
>>> point in formally moving the document at this point.
>>>
>>
>> It is especially slow when none of the people interested in the specific
>> feature (FQDN in ICE candidates) participate in the discussion. So far this
>> looks like this feature is going to be shipped regardless of what anybody
>> thinks about it and without even attempting to discuss it in the group
>> which is responsible for this functionality.
>>
>> My favorite examples are -msid (initial version May 2012, IESG evaluation
>> June 2016); -sdp-simulcast (initial version April 2015, IESG evaluation May
>> 2018); -bundle-negotiation (initial version October 2011, IESG evaluation
>> February 2018).
>>
>> Each of these has its own history, but when a group is capable of
>> discussing a draft for seven years before it is IESG-ready, I question the
>> effectieness of moving drafts into that group.
>>
>>
>> Best Regards,
>> _____________
>> Roman Shpount
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Surveillance is pervasive. Go Dark.
>>
>> _______________________________________________
> rtcweb mailing list
> rtcweb@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email