IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [rtcweb] Finishing up the Video Codec document, MTI (again, still, sorry)

Roman Shpount <roman@telurix.com> Sun, 07 December 2014 16:28 UTC

Return-Path: <roman@telurix.com>
X-Original-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 19DDB1A1A23 for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 7 Dec 2014 08:28:50 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.978
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.978 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id sc6S5MwXpwy3 for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 7 Dec 2014 08:28:48 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-wi0-f178.google.com (mail-wi0-f178.google.com [209.85.212.178]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 830D41A1A11 for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Sun, 7 Dec 2014 08:28:48 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-wi0-f178.google.com with SMTP id em10so2732473wid.17 for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Sun, 07 Dec 2014 08:28:47 -0800 (PST)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=9Q2XxtRZrfq+g0CdBHgCrEpezz6o0aBlp/5rAW+ZlTc=; b=TJqEch9gHHpMrj4VX458LYSL9X02f9wV08yKUDYIXMQqnPnGCGLBd1bOfL8wgboIgZ HrfLvrD7jdmuYw1iEr6RZ2wDG7GLMl44HbZXUEU5p+W9KqNwhb6sdtiWAE/uvXNsncQI 5HxaQj0kaufnwR/Us7EjvmYtb6NW6LXHFkMWwmhzewUo8DLOHmoBOSXSVoIkwFMvcHFA +LPA9qp67D338pdeJ1rWP8mhniS7/IFOV9eGmOEO/bMaG1nHsP0O9Bgy8gORv2/FNCUC RFmcs+K/vefX+b40EkZEsE6CvgUzC4gnx1K+PGORCxnkkBrwOZ2FFzJrvnJRZbfzb+wX 6ExQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQl2T+N/X8GaO/jaLxWAEvmB2BgQ7EHLpPpotbGnAt6+5BZglE3ayUw7bMntxgfuVYZRP0Mp
X-Received: by 10.180.8.202 with SMTP id t10mr18478738wia.15.1417969727187; Sun, 07 Dec 2014 08:28:47 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-wi0-f172.google.com (mail-wi0-f172.google.com. [209.85.212.172]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id d2sm53147190wjs.32.2014.12.07.08.28.45 for <rtcweb@ietf.org> (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Sun, 07 Dec 2014 08:28:45 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-wi0-f172.google.com with SMTP id n3so2742493wiv.11 for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Sun, 07 Dec 2014 08:28:45 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.194.110.161 with SMTP id ib1mr40799041wjb.78.1417969725693; Sun, 07 Dec 2014 08:28:45 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.216.70.16 with HTTP; Sun, 7 Dec 2014 08:28:45 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <20141206054017.5955730.89689.3585@blackberry.com>
References: <547511DB.5050100@nostrum.com> <54759A4C.6020806@gmail.com> <5476092D.4010406@nostrum.com> <15EF2452-2C2C-420B-B972-C37EACE57850@apple.com> <547F60A8.3080302@alvestrand.no> <27F838F1-326D-48BD-B553-6FE993E5C34F@apple.com> <92D0D52F3A63344CA478CF12DB0648AADF354465@XMB111CNC.rim.net> <547FA924.3000504@mozilla.com> <92D0D52F3A63344CA478CF12DB0648AADF35455C@XMB111CNC.rim.net> <548052E7.1050007@alvestrand.no> <92D0D52F3A63344CA478CF12DB0648AADF359C76@XMB111CNC.rim.net> <548203E2.90602@nostrum.com> <20141206054017.5955730.89689.3585@blackberry.com>
Date: Sun, 07 Dec 2014 11:28:45 -0500
Message-ID: <CAD5OKxtnQDkKQOohVFdQ1n5+2GU7rjHNjsUH4r3Scv_kc7y6UA@mail.gmail.com>
From: Roman Shpount <roman@telurix.com>
To: Andrew Allen <aallen@blackberry.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="089e0102fc52cd63e40509a2cd7f"
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/rtcweb/RiOBwe4f8-08cNJH68C6X2gpUDs
Cc: "rtcweb@ietf.org" <rtcweb@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [rtcweb] Finishing up the Video Codec document, MTI (again, still, sorry)
X-BeenThere: rtcweb@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Real-Time Communication in WEB-browsers working group list <rtcweb.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/rtcweb/>
List-Post: <mailto:rtcweb@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 07 Dec 2014 16:28:50 -0000

On Sat, Dec 6, 2014 at 12:40 AM, Andrew Allen <aallen@blackberry.com> wrote:

>
>  As Harald already admitted this entire debate has been about companies
> business interests and not technical merits. There is ABSOLUTELY NO
> TECHNICAL REASON to have 2 MTI video codecs. This has been company business
> interest from the start.
>

This is disingenuous at the very least: There is a great technical reason
to have 2 or more MTI video codecs -- interoperability.  If it weren't for
the IPR related issues, I would still vote for VP8 and H.264 as MTI, since
these are the two wide spread codecs that enable video calls of acceptable
quality.
_____________
Roman Shpount

v2.27.8 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status