IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [rtcweb] VP8 vs H.264 - subjective evaluation

Harald Alvestrand <harald@alvestrand.no> Wed, 23 October 2013 08:26 UTC

Return-Path: <harald@alvestrand.no>
X-Original-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6A9A821E8099 for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 23 Oct 2013 01:26:25 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -110.524
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-110.524 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.075, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-8, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id KM70cj2dztyI for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 23 Oct 2013 01:26:19 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from eikenes.alvestrand.no (eikenes.alvestrand.no [158.38.152.233]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B872521E8098 for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Wed, 23 Oct 2013 01:26:15 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by eikenes.alvestrand.no (Postfix) with ESMTP id F289039E128 for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Wed, 23 Oct 2013 10:26:13 +0200 (CEST)
X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at eikenes.alvestrand.no
Received: from eikenes.alvestrand.no ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (eikenes.alvestrand.no [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id crPacbHq49F2 for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Wed, 23 Oct 2013 10:26:13 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from [192.168.1.17] (unknown [188.113.88.47]) by eikenes.alvestrand.no (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 78BF339E116 for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Wed, 23 Oct 2013 10:26:13 +0200 (CEST)
Message-ID: <5267882B.4060906@alvestrand.no>
Date: Wed, 23 Oct 2013 10:26:19 +0200
From: Harald Alvestrand <harald@alvestrand.no>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: rtcweb@ietf.org
References: <52665274.9080705@alvestrand.no> <52671AF7.5040107@librevideo.org>
In-Reply-To: <52671AF7.5040107@librevideo.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: Re: [rtcweb] VP8 vs H.264 - subjective evaluation
X-BeenThere: rtcweb@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Real-Time Communication in WEB-browsers working group list <rtcweb.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/rtcweb>
List-Post: <mailto:rtcweb@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 23 Oct 2013 08:26:25 -0000

On 10/23/2013 02:40 AM, Basil Mohamed Gohar wrote:
> On 10/22/2013 06:24 AM, Harald Alvestrand wrote:
>> In my VP8 advocate draft, I referred to a subjective evaluation test
>> (test with
>> actual human viewers) done between VP8 and H.264 Baseline by a neutral
>> (non-Google) laboratory.
>>
>> The attached presentation is the writeup of the results of that test.
>>
> Are the sources used in the video comparison test available anywhere?
>
They are under an MPEG license, so they're freely available to MPEG 
members for use in developing MPEG standards. If you fall within that 
category, I can send you the FTP server and password.

MPEG doesn't have the tradition of open materials that the IETF has.

v2.14.0 | Report a Bug | By Email