Re: [rtcweb] Default proto transport in JSEP

Roman Shpount <roman@telurix.com> Mon, 19 November 2018 20:21 UTC

Return-Path: <roman@telurix.com>
X-Original-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 21309124D68 for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 19 Nov 2018 12:21:10 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.89
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.89 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_MED=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, T_SPF_PERMERROR=0.01] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=telurix-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id pS_hbBk6pUIU for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 19 Nov 2018 12:21:08 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-pf1-x42c.google.com (mail-pf1-x42c.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::42c]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 84A9B1292F1 for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Mon, 19 Nov 2018 12:21:05 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-pf1-x42c.google.com with SMTP id u3-v6so12704603pfm.4 for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Mon, 19 Nov 2018 12:21:05 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=telurix-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=i55mqN5/aXsnLL+srsQG9GYjondiOH4zeCN+3x8PPk8=; b=v6fyP1gRxXg5gTAVSdyOyThAUmrXndFq+RrgVY9v2PGIKingnFS9K5uUOTDgviyZc8 Jgp4P1mck3EwMs/ueUvP9Bkriuiwcmz9+3xbW2mF7C7oUsIGgv4f/Y+b5jDgeRRZgzzJ bXIWf4K50Z1PIyV9u9ACv0YYsD55f7/M5oCBJtFh2G1aH7wWNbgqgWRtE1+mJmQZlSyO nygu6ObkebTtSwsfxjJXisgYoAd35ywhCtLFT3pcXzi4ZzFqOpxdE+8IsG1iu71glYaD AtKMRiYAJHnipw3+PrRyX+d5JeekgnAxevP4yFRNwU4l9py3vxVUoolaX5lpn4irQJIX Gu2w==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=i55mqN5/aXsnLL+srsQG9GYjondiOH4zeCN+3x8PPk8=; b=gSiK/39XWYuZR/AdjjGN2yP6e0FrkEyqa1010XG3ibLxdgxbKjW5ktCgH9KUzm8k3R pOZ/vssM9x6RNIun7Tcs0iFDSC+FoClz5Qcggq9m0XhHxErK668Y8X4Oz5TV5+x+4FGE HUUOcm3Sa9kOA87LJTyVZDHLu3pYLvRNQQ9rZuG27tnzrik35ivT3TjT7yuipE1FjfGg nGhf+zsCZo0CSOMqxd0hiZGAfiL2tVAdWHr6scq8lmmPdOML6b4Cy50ep3JMZdidwuWD JqUvVpEePOTfMgamqov1E2dDhSccWGACKQkTfL1cEb47v4GOYX7z4o+viCYwi/6J1oQ/ doCA==
X-Gm-Message-State: AGRZ1gIInuD4kueq8MyJiu6oAORkjfWAG5vaHuwbk609BnK/jF5HaYoW VpXS/EwXwSUGLXlAMc4mThNpbwsbf6A=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AJdET5fvfZktVnnKq1cXmEbWQaikSe2N/rKbPEZtXql9+opjoAvokxJwgWjr4a/dRWVK3Uor72TPIw==
X-Received: by 2002:a62:6085:: with SMTP id u127-v6mr22607457pfb.147.1542658864980; Mon, 19 Nov 2018 12:21:04 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-pf1-f182.google.com (mail-pf1-f182.google.com. [209.85.210.182]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id j185sm16004295pge.72.2018.11.19.12.21.04 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Mon, 19 Nov 2018 12:21:04 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-pf1-f182.google.com with SMTP id 64so10907581pfr.9; Mon, 19 Nov 2018 12:21:04 -0800 (PST)
X-Received: by 2002:a62:9f42:: with SMTP id g63-v6mr24249345pfe.144.1542658863884; Mon, 19 Nov 2018 12:21:03 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <CA+9kkMADnZJBaV0hfLuwGU0bGBEP5tCPZ=8Zd_85Dgzi37ghAQ@mail.gmail.com> <CAD5OKxsNFFmER__H0+5Mzts58yn9cWLMEADhSnLR4nreKD9WAQ@mail.gmail.com> <CALiegfkHXv6f8P3C-C=2RKCyxWfzCAzkzOqxBXmmsNCPrZzFfg@mail.gmail.com> <CAD5OKxswZdGm1CYvy=NoyEtN-eFFp7Sc8mmGT7jAJ-q3msJYXA@mail.gmail.com> <CALiegfmFV=988+WuViUQRGJRgR=mcqS9Y+eDnL4pH6VrbJRvCQ@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CALiegfmFV=988+WuViUQRGJRgR=mcqS9Y+eDnL4pH6VrbJRvCQ@mail.gmail.com>
From: Roman Shpount <roman@telurix.com>
Date: Mon, 19 Nov 2018 15:20:53 -0500
X-Gmail-Original-Message-ID: <CAD5OKxtwuQu0du+ptmJpX0ALQnUtjLG==NanP8OB51D4M9fYhg@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <CAD5OKxtwuQu0du+ptmJpX0ALQnUtjLG==NanP8OB51D4M9fYhg@mail.gmail.com>
To: Iñaki Baz Castillo <ibc@aliax.net>
Cc: RTCWeb IETF <rtcweb@ietf.org>, mmusic WG <mmusic@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000977085057b0a4191"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/rtcweb/Rrk9ix5SyplCuoMgGIclygp0r-0>
Subject: Re: [rtcweb] Default proto transport in JSEP
X-BeenThere: rtcweb@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Real-Time Communication in WEB-browsers working group list <rtcweb.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/rtcweb/>
List-Post: <mailto:rtcweb@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 19 Nov 2018 20:21:10 -0000

On Mon, Nov 19, 2018 at 3:09 PM Iñaki Baz Castillo <ibc@aliax.net> wrote:

> Which interop? If a peer is WebRTC compatible then it MUST use ICE, so
> whatever is written in the c= line and whatever the m= protoo is, it
> won't need to read it. And if the other party is "legacy" and does not
> implement WebRTC, then they both just can not communicate.
>
> So this is just cosmetic and has zero value. And there are endless
> discussions about this topic for the last 3-4 years just because those
> fields exist in the SDP.
>
> ICE specifications (both RFC 5245 and ice-sip-sdp) are saying that these
fields are not cosmetic. All I am asking is to put values in these fields
that indicate that they are cosmetic instead of creating some rules on how
these fields should change which would cause potential interop issues.

BTW, there are plenty of VoIP phones which use ICE and support Opus (or
G.711). They will also produce ICE mismatch since they implement RFC 5245.
So, these end points are WebRTC compatible except for this specific issue.

Regards,
_____________
Roman Shpount