Re: [rtcweb] Codec Draft
Cullen Jennings <fluffy@cisco.com> Sun, 18 December 2011 00:49 UTC
Return-Path: <fluffy@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9F87B1F0C3F for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 17 Dec 2011 16:49:07 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -106.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-106.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ul6EJwLT2IHq for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 17 Dec 2011 16:49:07 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mtv-iport-3.cisco.com (mtv-iport-3.cisco.com [173.36.130.14]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1E05B1F0C3B for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Sat, 17 Dec 2011 16:49:07 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=fluffy@cisco.com; l=699; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1324169347; x=1325378947; h=subject:mime-version:from:in-reply-to:date:cc: content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=+AzmVk++v3SpqZlTLtaHzVR7nrTla5DqY4bACUhG0gg=; b=ZzXFokkgFh5fRw6os2VzkSnt0Klfdld12CAaFzMws3deioIzqyCWYC0m PAEMSZEzVmSvy72OgsQho8aYIWF7OXUU7WfXt6Yi4MgzikQvYV4jDBkMj 2dZgzIp072bdrCnwSwk9zGBIScpK6mUfk3X3aKy9UjMNOpuVgZih2OEVD Q=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: Av0EACo37U6rRDoG/2dsb2JhbABDq1iBBYFyAQEBBBIBJz8QC0ZXBjWgTwGdXIshYwSUfpJA
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.71,370,1320624000"; d="scan'208";a="21316445"
Received: from mtv-core-1.cisco.com ([171.68.58.6]) by mtv-iport-3.cisco.com with ESMTP; 18 Dec 2011 00:49:06 +0000
Received: from sjc-vpn5-1409.cisco.com (sjc-vpn5-1409.cisco.com [10.21.93.129]) by mtv-core-1.cisco.com (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id pBI0n5ai002904; Sun, 18 Dec 2011 00:49:05 GMT
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1251.1)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
From: Cullen Jennings <fluffy@cisco.com>
In-Reply-To: <4EECEA08.5050300@sbcglobal.net>
Date: Sun, 18 Dec 2011 10:49:04 +1000
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <34E0C34E-3550-4A59-83EC-D372F33A5BCF@cisco.com>
References: <746276993.96103.1324085707648.JavaMail.root@zimbra1.shared.sjc1.mozilla.com> <4EECEA08.5050300@sbcglobal.net>
To: Rob Glidden <rob.glidden@sbcglobal.net>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1251.1)
Cc: rtcweb@ietf.org, Cary Bran <Cary.Bran@plantronics.com>
Subject: Re: [rtcweb] Codec Draft
X-BeenThere: rtcweb@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Real-Time Communication in WEB-browsers working group list <rtcweb.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/rtcweb>
List-Post: <mailto:rtcweb@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 18 Dec 2011 00:49:07 -0000
On Dec 18, 2011, at 5:14 , Rob Glidden wrote: > "The REQUIRED video codec should be a royalty-free codec which has been specified by a recognized standards process such as MPEG or other due-process standards group and provide reviewable substantiation of its royalty-free status." I sort of agree with the sentiment of this but the problem is that it is often not practically possible to figure out if any given codec is royalty free or not and the IETF explicitly does not take on the task of trying to figure out if a given technology actually infringes on a given patent or not. I don't think a requirement like that would really fit inside the IETF process.
- [rtcweb] Codec Draft Bran, Cary
- Re: [rtcweb] Codec Draft Stephan Wenger
- Re: [rtcweb] Codec Draft Bran, Cary
- Re: [rtcweb] Codec Draft Bran, Cary
- Re: [rtcweb] Codec Draft Magnus Westerlund
- Re: [rtcweb] Codec Draft Xavier Marjou
- Re: [rtcweb] Codec Draft Xavier Marjou
- Re: [rtcweb] Codec Draft Iñaki Baz Castillo
- Re: [rtcweb] Codec Draft Bran, Cary
- Re: [rtcweb] Codec Draft Christer Holmberg
- Re: [rtcweb] Codec Draft Harald Alvestrand
- Re: [rtcweb] Codec Draft Iñaki Baz Castillo
- Re: [rtcweb] Codec Draft Xavier Marjou
- Re: [rtcweb] Codec Draft Randell Jesup
- Re: [rtcweb] Codec Draft Iñaki Baz Castillo
- Re: [rtcweb] Codec Draft Roman Shpount
- Re: [rtcweb] Codec Draft Cullen Jennings
- Re: [rtcweb] Codec Draft Ralph Giles
- Re: [rtcweb] Codec Draft Ralph Giles
- Re: [rtcweb] Codec Draft Cullen Jennings
- Re: [rtcweb] Codec Draft Bernard Aboba
- Re: [rtcweb] Codec Draft Jean-Marc Valin
- Re: [rtcweb] Codec Draft Miguel Casas-Sanchez
- Re: [rtcweb] Codec Draft Ralph Giles
- Re: [rtcweb] Codec Draft Stefan Håkansson
- Re: [rtcweb] Codec Draft Rob Glidden
- Re: [rtcweb] Codec Draft Bran, Cary
- Re: [rtcweb] Codec Draft Harald Alvestrand
- Re: [rtcweb] Codec Draft Bran, Cary
- Re: [rtcweb] Codec Draft Lorenzo Miniero
- Re: [rtcweb] Codec Draft Rob Glidden
- Re: [rtcweb] Codec Draft Rob Glidden
- Re: [rtcweb] Codec Draft Rob Glidden
- Re: [rtcweb] Codec Draft Rob Glidden
- Re: [rtcweb] Codec Draft Timothy B. Terriberry
- Re: [rtcweb] Codec Draft Ted Hardie
- Re: [rtcweb] Codec Draft Stephan Wenger
- Re: [rtcweb] Codec Draft Timothy B. Terriberry
- Re: [rtcweb] Codec Draft Stephan Wenger
- Re: [rtcweb] Codec Draft Rob Glidden
- Re: [rtcweb] Codec Draft Cullen Jennings
- Re: [rtcweb] Codec Draft Rob Glidden
- Re: [rtcweb] Codec Draft Rob Glidden
- Re: [rtcweb] Codec Draft Marshall Eubanks
- Re: [rtcweb] Codec Draft Cullen Jennings