Re: [rtcweb] Call for adoption of QoS draft

denglingli@chinamobile.com Sat, 08 September 2012 02:43 UTC

Return-Path: <denglingli@chinamobile.com>
X-Original-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5118721E80B4 for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 7 Sep 2012 19:43:04 -0700 (PDT)
X-Quarantine-ID: <9q4zrZ-GDkcF>
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Amavis-Alert: BAD HEADER SECTION, Duplicate header field: "MIME-Version"
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 4.673
X-Spam-Level: ****
X-Spam-Status: No, score=4.673 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_50=0.001, MIME_CHARSET_FARAWAY=2.45, RELAY_IS_221=2.222]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 9q4zrZ-GDkcF for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 7 Sep 2012 19:43:03 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from imss.chinamobile.com (imss.chinamobile.com [221.130.253.135]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8E59C21E805A for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Fri, 7 Sep 2012 19:43:03 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from imss.chinamobile.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by localhost.chinamobile.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0BB37E465; Sat, 8 Sep 2012 10:43:04 +0800 (CST)
Received: from mail.chinamobile.com (unknown [10.1.28.22]) by imss.chinamobile.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 01C88E450; Sat, 8 Sep 2012 10:43:04 +0800 (CST)
To: Parthasarathi R <partha@parthasarathi.co.in>
MIME-Version: 1.0
From: denglingli@chinamobile.com
Date: Sat, 08 Sep 2012 10:43:02 +0800
Message-ID: <OF0860B3E0.C3ECA36B-ON48257A73.000EED47-48257A73.000EED54@chinamobile.com>
X-Mailer: Lotus Domino Web Server Release 6.5.6 March 06, 2007
X-MIMETrack: Serialize by Router on jtgsml01/servers/cmcc(Release 6.5.6|March 06, 2007) at 2012-09-08 10:43:03
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="GB2312"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-TM-AS-Product-Ver: IMSS-7.0.0.8231-6.8.0.1017-19170.003
X-TM-AS-Result: No--12.197-7.0-31-10
X-imss-scan-details: No--12.197-7.0-31-10;No--12.197-7.0-31-10
X-TM-AS-User-Approved-Sender: No;No
X-TM-AS-User-Blocked-Sender: No;No
Cc: rtcweb@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [rtcweb] Call for adoption of QoS draft
X-BeenThere: rtcweb@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Real-Time Communication in WEB-browsers working group list <rtcweb.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/rtcweb>
List-Post: <mailto:rtcweb@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 08 Sep 2012 02:43:04 -0000

+1

Lingli  



=======您在来信中写到:=======
+1

-----Original Message-----
From: rtcweb-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:rtcweb-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of
Eric Rescorla
Sent: Saturday, September 08, 2012 3:03 AM
To: Timothy B. Terriberry
Cc: rtcweb@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [rtcweb] Call for adoption of QoS draft

+1

On Fri, Sep 7, 2012 at 2:29 PM, Timothy B. Terriberry
<tterriberry@mozilla.com> wrote:
> Ted Hardie wrote:
>>
>> describes the QoS issues relating to RTCWEB.  We would like to call
>> for adoption of draft-jennings-rtcweb-qos-00 as the input draft.  Dan
>
>
> I support the publication of this draft as a working group item with Dan
> Druta as the editor.
>
> _______________________________________________
> rtcweb mailing list
> rtcweb@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb
_______________________________________________
rtcweb mailing list
rtcweb@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb

_______________________________________________
rtcweb mailing list
rtcweb@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb


邓灵莉
中国移动通信研究院
denglingli@chinamobile.com