Re: [rtcweb] VP8 vs H.264 - the core issue

cowwoc <cowwoc@bbs.darktech.org> Mon, 28 October 2013 03:21 UTC

Return-Path: <cowwoc@bbs.darktech.org>
X-Original-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3A54B11E8265 for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 27 Oct 2013 20:21:37 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -5.349
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.349 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-1.750, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 3rSqsXQQVLkf for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 27 Oct 2013 20:21:31 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-qa0-f48.google.com (mail-qa0-f48.google.com [209.85.216.48]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5FDB211E82FA for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Sun, 27 Oct 2013 20:21:28 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-qa0-f48.google.com with SMTP id k4so1837297qaq.0 for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Sun, 27 Oct 2013 20:21:27 -0700 (PDT)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to :cc:subject:references:in-reply-to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=mZRc/FdSSZ1nAQPQYnGzYkRFlfjgJHmqCK6vzptMFWo=; b=cvcRZlJbiLxve1sNnFTSStIwpZ867ANYfu3YrR1jA+poPg09VUpGx67e9OUIQtVLsp GwVm1FHgT/gi4xB6sr8CLZsJ8vrKTB2ugCsQwZAWaNXLU5HA5UJhJ5jXkLqr3VTkXkHG gKtepZTAD8l6vDI/8gOPw/33tLBDFGB4oylGtwdHmj+bpXyoYl4zzvLGFtsViwvT0oLF uHEwyXdyIzZyRIaczcR/7m8As5T3Zh8uCWk4g+ngrEIm0cTi1wTnHRhlwL85KFlwSiHv /r3xxYjW9efe0fL4A+BZlbx9HnQeICxk8/e6aDhNTGGz96A3M5zkNe9X0kHB+HaR7VZs c96Q==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQnQrw20V+qvhm4CKniLbc83g8NSIbsbcorIrdPGpf8npCqjE0A2H7Ebzf2775UJMJ11n8yq
X-Received: by 10.49.41.3 with SMTP id b3mr25929360qel.51.1382930487717; Sun, 27 Oct 2013 20:21:27 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.1.100] (206-248-171-209.dsl.teksavvy.com. [206.248.171.209]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id ge5sm39581141qeb.5.2013.10.27.20.21.26 for <multiple recipients> (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Sun, 27 Oct 2013 20:21:27 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <526DD834.8000308@bbs.darktech.org>
Date: Sun, 27 Oct 2013 23:21:24 -0400
From: cowwoc <cowwoc@bbs.darktech.org>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.0.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: "Cullen Jennings (fluffy)" <fluffy@cisco.com>
References: <52681A96.2020904@alvestrand.no> <AE1A6B5FD507DC4FB3C5166F3A05A4843D45DC08@TK5EX14MBXC266.redmond.corp.microsoft.com> <5269764C.4030801@librevideo.org> <52698758.5040404@bbs.darktech.org> <CAD6AjGSb5syh0HO+89fH8cGZ0zqM6gYLPj3aeTRQLN0u8W4cSg@mail.gmail.com> <5269F098.2020904@alvestrand.no> <E44893DD4E290745BB608EB23FDDB7620A0F272E@008-AM1MPN1-043.mgdnok.nokia.com> <949EF20990823C4C85C18D59AA11AD8B0BF358@FR712WXCHMBA11.zeu.alcatel-lucent.com> <CAGgHUiRtXUAJTotAFX7YwQ6cS_OD-MpAb+898c6OYxm7D5xXKw@mail.gmail.com> <FCBEDCB500188C488DA30C874B94F80E1C01158C@xmb-rcd-x03.cisco.com> <CAOJ7v-1iV4_SvToRYYtDZszxkSDF0qmrS4YN8w7OFQ3p29CaDw@mail.gmail.com> <526AE703.8000409@bbs.darktech.org> <CA+9kkMC=RrmAEyd0uWjpPhvCGuUnj5ATmuZrA7FnAxXhqMJXrg@mail.gmail.com> <526C15CD.5020601@bbs.darktech.org> <526C3FE4.2040301@alvestrand.no> <526C4686.2080702@bbs.darktech.org> <C5E08FE080ACFD4DAE31E4BDBF944EB123CE3208@xmb-aln-x02.cisco.com>
In-Reply-To: <C5E08FE080ACFD4DAE31E4BDBF944EB123CE3208@xmb-aln-x02.cisco.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: "rtcweb@ietf.org" <rtcweb@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [rtcweb] VP8 vs H.264 - the core issue
X-BeenThere: rtcweb@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Real-Time Communication in WEB-browsers working group list <rtcweb.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/rtcweb>
List-Post: <mailto:rtcweb@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 28 Oct 2013 03:21:37 -0000

On 27/10/2013 2:26 PM, Cullen Jennings (fluffy) wrote:
> Apple people have been involved (in fact are co-authors of some of the 
> drafts on the VP8 vs H264 topic) and Microsoft clearly been very 
> involved with the WG as well. Kaufman has been clear his employer has 
> a policy of not pre announcing products and I believe the same is true 
> of Apple. This is often true of standards work in any WG so it limits 
> how much people can exactly say about their employers until product is 
> announced - that's pretty normal at IETF. 

     Out of curiosity, who is representing Apple? I don't remember 
seeing the company name appearing on any of the documentation.

Gili