IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [rtcweb] WGLC for draft-ietf-rtcweb-sdp - Christer's review

Suhas Nandakumar <suhasietf@gmail.com> Wed, 01 August 2018 13:33 UTC

Return-Path: <suhasietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 84E67130E8D for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 1 Aug 2018 06:33:48 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.998
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.998 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id MKHFogrsxGHW for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 1 Aug 2018 06:33:46 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-vk0-x22b.google.com (mail-vk0-x22b.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400c:c05::22b]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D66A5128CFD for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Wed, 1 Aug 2018 06:33:45 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-vk0-x22b.google.com with SMTP id l143-v6so9286143vke.1 for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Wed, 01 Aug 2018 06:33:45 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=ZL9lSLInlMG6cE/72Fk0fe5maxCCFD/746okEWxsheQ=; b=YpsvMlb+ix/Pbo7rM8Acr52x1U6CEtW8s5gXUSCKXbq8zsy7SzJqCBE4pOLOjplMkm yhZw1sh632eAqb4bOnRcDzbY6wB0J44EZoMFCqMsaNqF573Ly54ET6kLkqhlkIb+nvl2 LjF17pZbzmAFTIOgyJ9BnIZlvWxwwhkS9Pt0yel11j45F9qBhgANpBAX7WtbjV8gIZX2 lBUFZSfrLnErDDmGIiMEAqwZiZBjG+qYIcsP9RVcxLkw21fmCbUdAkjc0D26/+cVBC+6 5WG4eDR886nz5y7on8XLC3WxH06lqeQ0U5uZye8dmXgbzeyIplnSKOyVyy+9z1P/8nto D6kQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=ZL9lSLInlMG6cE/72Fk0fe5maxCCFD/746okEWxsheQ=; b=RS4xha6SD94yGtzHOiiuqW54KRUdBDHwCIUfMjXW5Nh6zTd4YReVr3wgAlbqXlnrUp ArNjlDbf+Qumcn7x/VCTwa9VV8uh1jx120bgdvfwtmQ9DD8Id4CKehckzJFzIitRoiR9 6rnzG6zv+buZmDnNTLkbALbKOanFcPfzyq3uJYlSSXyprpvGac+NORbT1v6EVYfJfAYm Q9niEK6y7RIArg5a/eP/3YKblaiStoRhBG+5cwPaZCBWWPmY9Ggc1IPBVARQq3qvaApM 0G+L6b87HJHRbJPQaGWi9lmxYrD59lJbK7hdLybbUq0sOdXTE/Gv1H2Pplkp6UbgZ1qZ xRqA==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOUpUlGMG4GyM5yfVC7katZJHZn0EZcBd82R6UzkLkTQbxmfeKF4jAN4 wZvc7XykbgBE6MV/ZmdbLcrWEBS+y7AbAqFtDfiYmw==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AAOMgpf/CutHMHh+ALqz9oo4PNvtx/boz+Ns5rnObjcv125tCvsSvz1TKjWv4jsGljo3Gv5cgRrDlC4OSC/YMg5JnxU=
X-Received: by 2002:a1f:e0c3:: with SMTP id x186-v6mr14897328vkg.91.1533130424965; Wed, 01 Aug 2018 06:33:44 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <cd59ef13e9474d9192f8604715252037@ericsson.com>
In-Reply-To: <cd59ef13e9474d9192f8604715252037@ericsson.com>
From: Suhas Nandakumar <suhasietf@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 01 Aug 2018 06:33:32 -0700
Message-ID: <CAMRcRGSM_JXKsftkcCjX2KfW617kJ2qU+fEOgrLWyXyaDWQhqw@mail.gmail.com>
To: Christer Holmberg <christer.holmberg@ericsson.com>
Cc: Sean Turner <sean@sn3rd.com>, rtcweb@ietf.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0000000000005fddb805725fbe23"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/rtcweb/SGo3EKQQrK3oFloNOT0HXv4eBOc>
Subject: Re: [rtcweb] WGLC for draft-ietf-rtcweb-sdp - Christer's review
X-BeenThere: rtcweb@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.27
Precedence: list
List-Id: Real-Time Communication in WEB-browsers working group list <rtcweb.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/rtcweb/>
List-Post: <mailto:rtcweb@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 01 Aug 2018 13:33:49 -0000

Hello Christer

Thanks for the review.Please see inline.

cheers
Suhas

On Sat, Jul 28, 2018 at 4:56 AM Christer Holmberg <
christer.holmberg@ericsson.com> wrote:

> Hi,
>
> Here are my comments:
>
> Q1: Regarding the ICE attributes (non-trickle), I think the draft shall
> reference draft-ietf-mmusic-ice-sip-sdp
>

[Suhas] Since JSEP refers to RFC5245, this draft decided to follow the same
as well.


> Q2: I think the examples shall include the 'ice2' ice-options value
> (defined in RFC 8445), to indicate that aggressive nomination is not
> supported.
>
> [Suhas] SDP examples are based on JSEP requirements for constructing SDP.
The latest version of  JSEP doesn't seem to support "ice2". It would be
nice to keep both the drafts in sync as for the rules of the SDP
construction. I am curious to hear what is the WG take on this though


> Yes, this again brings up the what-ICE-version-to-reference-question. All
> the other ICE related drafts in the examples reference (directly or
> indirectly) RFC 8445.
>
> Regards,
>
> Christer
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: rtcweb [mailto:rtcweb-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Sean Turner
> Sent: 26 July 2018 21:10
> To: RTCWeb IETF <rtcweb@ietf.org>
> Subject: [rtcweb] WGLC for draft-ietf-rtcweb-sdp
>
> All,
>
> This is the working group last call for the "Annotated Example SDP for
> WebRTC" draft available at
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-rtcweb-sdp/.  Please review
> the document and send your comments to the list by 2359 UTC on 17 August
> 2018.
>
> Thanks - spt
> _______________________________________________
> rtcweb mailing list
> rtcweb@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb
>
> _______________________________________________
> rtcweb mailing list
> rtcweb@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email