Re: [rtcweb] 答复: Some thoughts on optional audio codecs

Eric Rescorla <ekr@rtfm.com> Mon, 22 July 2013 01:39 UTC

Return-Path: <ekr@rtfm.com>
X-Original-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 36C3421F8423 for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 21 Jul 2013 18:39:49 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.137
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.137 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.387, BAYES_00=-2.599, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MIME_8BIT_HEADER=0.3, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1, SARE_SUB_ENC_UTF8=0.152, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 47Pa9icS2LGJ for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 21 Jul 2013 18:39:43 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-qc0-f178.google.com (mail-qc0-f178.google.com [209.85.216.178]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8ECF721F9A18 for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Sun, 21 Jul 2013 18:39:39 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-qc0-f178.google.com with SMTP id c11so3288528qcv.23 for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Sun, 21 Jul 2013 18:39:39 -0700 (PDT)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:x-originating-ip:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc:content-type:x-gm-message-state; bh=4iYfInK1yfCS5/R6kc5raCy8tPlIfh0HQiTjCA7dogE=; b=AHAzStI/AhLJYALzfNW2MDlBdi9+HezEYDPxiU9KBYdgcSp1nJh+B8jYfFxo8VyGjF Shyt8ufepA6ZlY3Hb/1tx2L0VXjURFKZXFnpEHMCmyO0MScPfmd7Sj9MByUgnhkgPrxd +um9guYhhaDUE7K3iATX6W1I/dW/rQ6dhZPVonyB4SuA/Pb3syKbefvY9p85fjaN3QUw /XluykUOdhltOTLuRhWKUDPMsEZLCH8dshkNNPFo8ho0bxofXyElFMQOK00b3Vn+jU83 GNOePnhFJDv3Pnmc0ehv+biNOtDWyPZXneQQ3Wf0yDFs05Xghffci5JpC3IHCD05UDxO pNoA==
X-Received: by 10.229.173.202 with SMTP id q10mr6872143qcz.64.1374457179008; Sun, 21 Jul 2013 18:39:39 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.49.48.234 with HTTP; Sun, 21 Jul 2013 18:38:58 -0700 (PDT)
X-Originating-IP: [74.95.2.173]
In-Reply-To: <A3045C90BB645147BC99159AA47ABAC7419F610E@szxeml558-mbs.china.huawei.com>
References: <BBE9739C2C302046BD34B42713A1E2A22DEE3029@ESESSMB105.ericsson.se> <A3045C90BB645147BC99159AA47ABAC7419F610E@szxeml558-mbs.china.huawei.com>
From: Eric Rescorla <ekr@rtfm.com>
Date: Sun, 21 Jul 2013 18:38:58 -0700
Message-ID: <CABcZeBNrVByn0fnYB_CEgZ9eFMX+nF8Rmmn3yLm-VZET9sBhcA@mail.gmail.com>
To: "Lijing (Jessie, Technology Introduction & Standard and Patent Dept)" <lijing80@huawei.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a1132eee6ea076904e20fbf2d
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQlEtUfs3ixwxwoyds8hNVADM58pVRSGJ2metgEQvBeoKUlRWN1iSvFxPzGDBRqlu7VZ8ojf
Cc: "rtcweb@ietf.org" <rtcweb@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [rtcweb] =?utf-8?b?562U5aSNOiBTb21lIHRob3VnaHRzIG9uIG9wdGlvbmFs?= =?utf-8?q?_audio_codecs?=
X-BeenThere: rtcweb@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Real-Time Communication in WEB-browsers working group list <rtcweb.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/rtcweb>
List-Post: <mailto:rtcweb@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 22 Jul 2013 01:39:49 -0000

On Sun, Jul 21, 2013 at 6:34 PM, Lijing (Jessie, Technology Introduction &
Standard and Patent Dept) <lijing80@huawei.com> wrote:

> I fully agree with the idea to " use existing "native" codecs ".
>
> In addition, from a web developer's perspective, in order to make use of
> the "native" codecs, the browser should provide codec APIs to open the
> local codec capabilities of the device to applications and developers. It
> really make sense.
>

I don't understand what this means.

-Ekr