Re: [rtcweb] DRAFT Agenda for RTCWEB

BUNDLE and data muxing works for both "Plan A" and "Plan B".

Recall that "Plan B" is muxing multiple media sources of the same type over
a single m= line, and BUNDLE then provides muxing of the audio, video, and
data m= lines.

On Thu, Feb 28, 2013 at 3:10 PM, Ejzak, Richard P (Richard) <
richard.ejzak@alcatel-lucent.com> wrote:

> Since multiplexing of the data channel with RTP media has been shown as a
> desirable feature of BUNDLE (and most of its variants), I would suggest
> that this be treated as a significant advantage for BUNDLE (and similarly
> capable variants) over any proposal without it.  Cullen's "Plan A" is
> preferred over Plan B precisely because it has an incremental muxing
> advantage.
>
> BR, Richard
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: rtcweb-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:rtcweb-bounces@ietf.org] On
> > Behalf Of Christer Holmberg
> > Sent: Wednesday, February 27, 2013 2:30 PM
> > To: Ted Hardie; rtcweb@ietf.org
> > Cc: Richard Barnes; rtcweb-chairs@tools.ietf.org
> > Subject: Re: [rtcweb] DRAFT Agenda for RTCWEB
> >
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > Does the Data Channel part (or some other part) of the agenda include
> > making a decision on whether it shall be possible to bundle the Data
> > Channel with the RTP media?
> >
> > Or, do we already have consensus that it shall be possible?
> >
> > Just to clarify, because I think it is important input for the MMUSIC
> > discussions on the actual mechanism.
> >
> > Regards,
> >
> > Christer
> >
> >
> > ________________________________________
> > From: rtcweb-bounces@ietf.org [rtcweb-bounces@ietf.org] on behalf of
> > Ted Hardie [ted.ietf@gmail.com]
> > Sent: Wednesday, 27 February 2013 7:49 PM
> > To: rtcweb@ietf.org
> > Cc: Richard Barnes; rtcweb-chairs@tools.ietf.org
> > Subject: [rtcweb] DRAFT Agenda for RTCWEB
> >
> > The agenda below has been uploaded as an initial, draft agenda for the
> > group.  Comments on the timing and balance are encouraged.
> >
> > thanks,
> >
> > Ted Hardie
> >
> > RTCWEB Draft Agenda
> > March 12, 2013 9:00 to 11:30
> >
> > Administrivia (5 min)
> >
> > AD Message (5 min)
> >
> > Data Channel
> >  - draft-jesup-rtcweb-data-protocol (20 min)
> >  - draft-thomson-rtcweb-data (15 min)
> >  - draft-marcon-rtcweb-data-channel-management (15 min)
> >  - Discussion (30 min)
> >  - Consensus call(s) (5 min)
> >
> > WGLC Issue resolution (30 min)
> > - draft-ietf-rtcweb-security
> > - draft-ietf-rtcweb-security-arch
> > - draft-ietf-rtcweb-overview
> > - draft-ietf-rtcweb-use-cases-and-requirements
> >
> > RTCP-XR (15 min )
> > - draft-ietf-rtcweb-rtp-usage-06
> >
> > FEC in RTCWEB  (Call for interest)
> > - draft-mandyam-rtcweb-fecframe-00 (5 min)
> >
> > Mobile issues for RTCWEB (Call for review)
> > - http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-reddy-rtcweb-mobile-00 (5 min)
> >
> >
> > March 14, 2013 9:00 to 11:30
> >
> > JSEP
> > - draft-rtcweb-jsep (40 min)
> > - Discussion (30 min)
> > - Consensus call(s) (5)
> >
> > Video Codec                       10:15 to 11:30
> > 1. draft-alvestrand-rtcweb-vp8-01 (15 mins) 2. draft-burman-rtcweb-
> > h264-proposal-01+draft-dbenham-webrtcvideomti-01+draft-marjou-rtcweb-
> > video-codec-00
> > (25 mins)
> >       Discussion (30 minutes)
> >       Call the question (5 minutes)
> > _______________________________________________
> > rtcweb mailing list
> > rtcweb@ietf.org
> > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb
> > _______________________________________________
> > rtcweb mailing list
> > rtcweb@ietf.org
> > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb
> _______________________________________________
> rtcweb mailing list
> rtcweb@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb
>