Re: [rtcweb] Open data channel issues

Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com> Mon, 03 March 2014 14:41 UTC

Return-Path: <martin.thomson@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 39E8F1A0140 for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 3 Mar 2014 06:41:14 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id SaEAX3XuaLQ9 for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 3 Mar 2014 06:41:12 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-wg0-x230.google.com (mail-wg0-x230.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c00::230]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D12041A0155 for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Mon, 3 Mar 2014 06:41:11 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-wg0-f48.google.com with SMTP id b13so3281032wgh.31 for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Mon, 03 Mar 2014 06:41:08 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=mCxyLFhBkMk6JUxvWfKB/HAVfUiMExgVxzEfZ47rjXo=; b=GD0sapVsVPFV1dDIjIjgnY8nAtnYwgJ+eDSwy2gBPWJ1lq08Sn+e3GVIH8CVHwSUQQ ZvCVXT9wbvEGP6apQXmi7zp+0s3zCvekk1uvGr/flm3DOrnbp7tm474wwxlhTZj+hwrP MwocRcBXynwlEFruyHRjVqq646zR6Vb0vjuLiOLKLSFTjWDy2z8N84E0x5lDinljZBAQ lOHis6M9Ew859ndMUhSqaaBNwjsAba5eCnqB7ipX2KgnMx16S3mPVTMfxYaYupJcPVXb mOME0IXwxBgeHIVJho+48/zLht2NwtdDk/JNMOCAQOSMVWtezkuSzIhdrlyQd6f/RfEZ dfPQ==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.194.174.197 with SMTP id bu5mr6424538wjc.71.1393857668570; Mon, 03 Mar 2014 06:41:08 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.227.10.196 with HTTP; Mon, 3 Mar 2014 06:41:08 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <CABkgnnV1BdAMvFqGq8xiL0Zu28aZBCAdPwZB8whpMeXrCD7AHQ@mail.gmail.com>
References: <31B9253D-E826-4D07-A8A1-1B062B50F163@lurchi.franken.de> <530D9CC5.5080508@ericsson.com> <5312FBBC.5080006@jesup.org> <CAOJ7v-2GHt37u8raWDKquNFLCjSv-ptP0YGojPwuLv02da_m1Q@mail.gmail.com> <5313EC0D.9030808@jesup.org> <CAOJ7v-3L5_V2wuwVLKpz61VHey7yx3LnG_xrPLb5W+6DOLiEJw@mail.gmail.com> <53146B2C.8080008@jesup.org> <CABkgnnV1BdAMvFqGq8xiL0Zu28aZBCAdPwZB8whpMeXrCD7AHQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 3 Mar 2014 06:41:08 -0800
Message-ID: <CABkgnnWLLF7Ons0_qAD8xzKCW0kv07Byitwk3H9ifu9HNcEv2Q@mail.gmail.com>
From: Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>
To: Randell Jesup <randell-ietf@jesup.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/rtcweb/SmRGT9GS7LPcR3GFX7pzU-JJifo
Cc: "rtcweb@ietf.org" <rtcweb@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [rtcweb] Open data channel issues
X-BeenThere: rtcweb@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Real-Time Communication in WEB-browsers working group list <rtcweb.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/rtcweb/>
List-Post: <mailto:rtcweb@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 03 Mar 2014 14:41:14 -0000

I should have said prefix.

On 3 March 2014 05:53, Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com> wrote:
> On 3 March 2014 03:44, Randell Jesup <randell-ietf@jesup.org> wrote:
>> Hopefully so, though I hate forcing apps to include a bunch of code for
>> backwards compat for a year or two (and many won't, or won't test it, etc).
>> That hurts the feature.  And today no one has ndata.
>
> Since WebRTC is behind a flag, I don't find this particularly
> convincing.  We can implement ndata.
>
> I think that we could even remove our temporary length restriction.