Re: [rtcweb] Proposal for H.263 baseline codec

Basil Mohamed Gohar <basilgohar@librevideo.org> Thu, 29 March 2012 14:25 UTC

Return-Path: <basilgohar@librevideo.org>
X-Original-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0AE1B21E81A2 for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 29 Mar 2012 07:25:01 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.548
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.548 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.051, BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id IhqQAcNvVtjZ for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 29 Mar 2012 07:25:00 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.zaytoon.hidayahonline.net (zaytoon.hidayahonline.net [173.193.202.83]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4A2BE21E819F for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Thu, 29 Mar 2012 07:25:00 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [10.10.40.98] (rrcs-98-103-138-67.central.biz.rr.com [98.103.138.67]) by mail.zaytoon.hidayahonline.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 38928652662 for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Thu, 29 Mar 2012 10:24:59 -0400 (EDT)
Message-ID: <4F7470B7.9090202@librevideo.org>
Date: Thu, 29 Mar 2012 10:24:55 -0400
From: Basil Mohamed Gohar <basilgohar@librevideo.org>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.2.24) Gecko/20111108 Fedora/3.1.16-1.fc14 Lightning/1.0b3pre Thunderbird/3.1.16
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: rtcweb@ietf.org
References: <CB9A367A.85338%stewe@stewe.org>
In-Reply-To: <CB9A367A.85338%stewe@stewe.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: Re: [rtcweb] Proposal for H.263 baseline codec
X-BeenThere: rtcweb@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Real-Time Communication in WEB-browsers working group list <rtcweb.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/rtcweb>
List-Post: <mailto:rtcweb@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 29 Mar 2012 14:25:01 -0000

On 03/29/2012 10:20 AM, Stephan Wenger wrote:
> The second part of your sentence may or may not be true, depending on your
> relationship with google, your willingness to use the webm implementation
> in unchanged form, and other factors.  Please see the webm license
> conditions, which AFAIK can be found here:
> http://www.webmproject.org/license/additional/
Correct.  I think you are referring to this part, explicitly:
> If you or your agent or exclusive licensee institute or order or agree
> to the institution of patent litigation against any entity (including
> a cross-claim or counterclaim in a lawsuit) alleging that this
> implementation of VP8 or any code incorporated within this
> implementation of VP8 constitutes direct or contributory patent
> infringement, or inducement of patent infringement, then any patent
> rights granted to you under this License for this implementation of
> VP8 shall terminate as of the date such litigation is filed.
Perhaps I assumed that that is a very reasonable part of the license. 
That is, if you are suing someone alleging a patent infringement within
VP8, you are no longer granted the license to use VP8's patented
technologies that Google owns.