Re: [rtcweb] Unified Plan: 'bundle-only' documentation

Suhas Nandakumar <suhasietf@gmail.com> Fri, 27 September 2013 18:09 UTC

Return-Path: <suhasietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9656B11E815F for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 27 Sep 2013 11:09:50 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.751
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.751 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.848, BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, NO_RELAYS=-0.001]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Wq9SdVSqkjMW for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 27 Sep 2013 11:09:40 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-wg0-x22b.google.com (mail-wg0-x22b.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c00::22b]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7141821F94FA for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Fri, 27 Sep 2013 11:09:36 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-wg0-f43.google.com with SMTP id z12so3115288wgg.22 for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Fri, 27 Sep 2013 11:09:32 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=x5IaXzHay3qEMtYKhM3gHuiSOJCx41bZiq2IXbs/Wi4=; b=BNwgKfBHsWMdWZgXG1wZu4eozhPCOQTnFVZ1GoXjtSvqGSw6+tTLUIGhoEUPcvIS89 2l5utEpFoiGTsXogrdIP4WwHcqtcviRIjEOp3kbUo3Nlad5FRjzXdyba/6hpLK1ZFdrp 4GC2RjO1CKP/6ePn0ROkJONERHIUCAzG/iMlVAFRQ1WZwfCONs4tGkB+bErgNv0BKHpo b18gdHAu10KZrOnXwpH3ODoV8E09r64zVUgvVT9BwPyeUGVq/Vdq+qqKsgoVa2Nff/Ah 9Mtmi2ClFJVZwXsYX2MfNzigj4/dA/kYrrYjY5A66X3iQS+2iSaGC8TdO5YRQ7OzRZNe dFZw==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.195.13.164 with SMTP id ez4mr6946315wjd.11.1380305372715; Fri, 27 Sep 2013 11:09:32 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.194.178.231 with HTTP; Fri, 27 Sep 2013 11:09:32 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <CAOJ7v-1gEdtWMo2zyw0TTm3mPtmT-SHZ3TuVbuhHOuLYWioMPQ@mail.gmail.com>
References: <7594FB04B1934943A5C02806D1A2204B1C4ADF2D@ESESSMB209.ericsson.se> <CAOJ7v-1gEdtWMo2zyw0TTm3mPtmT-SHZ3TuVbuhHOuLYWioMPQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 27 Sep 2013 11:09:32 -0700
Message-ID: <CAMRcRGRmPXo79GTV5RuUwLjWe8U12vMc=U6n0-P=nt4YNVv11g@mail.gmail.com>
From: Suhas Nandakumar <suhasietf@gmail.com>
To: Justin Uberti <juberti@google.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="047d7bb04f686c1ef504e76163eb"
Cc: "rtcweb@ietf.org" <rtcweb@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [rtcweb] Unified Plan: 'bundle-only' documentation
X-BeenThere: rtcweb@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Real-Time Communication in WEB-browsers working group list <rtcweb.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/rtcweb>
List-Post: <mailto:rtcweb@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 27 Sep 2013 18:09:50 -0000

+1


On Fri, Sep 27, 2013 at 11:04 AM, Justin Uberti <juberti@google.com> wrote:

> I think that the BUNDLE draft is the right place for this.
>
>
> On Fri, Sep 27, 2013 at 6:59 AM, Christer Holmberg <
> christer.holmberg@ericsson.com> wrote:
>
>>  Hi,
>>
>>
>>
>> On the MMUSIC list I have suggested updated SDP Offer/Answer text for
>> BUNDLE.
>>
>>
>>
>> Part of that text is the definition, and usage, of the SDP 'bundle-only'
>> attribute.
>>
>>
>>
>> However, eventhough I personally think it fits well there (and I believe
>> Adam had the same opinion, when I talked with him off-line in Berlin),
>> afaik there has never been any formal WG agreement that the 'bundle-only'
>> attribute will be defined in the BUNDLE draft.
>>
>>
>>
>> So, without going into the details (there are some issues, and if you are
>> interested there are mail threads on the MMUSIC list dealing with those) do
>> people have any issues with defining the SDP 'bundle-only' attribute, and
>> the usage of it, in BUNDLE?
>>
>>
>>
>> If not, can we make a WG decision on the matter?
>>
>>
>>
>> Regards,
>>
>>
>>
>> Christer
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> rtcweb mailing list
>> rtcweb@ietf.org
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb
>>
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> rtcweb mailing list
> rtcweb@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb
>
>