IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [rtcweb] MTI Video Codec: a novel proposal

"Cavigioli, Chris" <chris.cavigioli@intel.com> Mon, 10 November 2014 17:29 UTC

Return-Path: <chris.cavigioli@intel.com>
X-Original-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 500051A1B80 for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 10 Nov 2014 09:29:17 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -7.495
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.495 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.594, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id tjOyffEHQmWZ for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 10 Nov 2014 09:29:15 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mga14.intel.com (mga14.intel.com [192.55.52.115]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3DD631A1B86 for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Mon, 10 Nov 2014 09:21:40 -0800 (PST)
Received: from fmsmga001.fm.intel.com ([10.253.24.23]) by fmsmga103.fm.intel.com with ESMTP; 10 Nov 2014 09:15:10 -0800
X-ExtLoop1: 1
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.07,353,1413270000"; d="scan'208";a="620059504"
Received: from orsmsx105.amr.corp.intel.com ([10.22.225.132]) by fmsmga001.fm.intel.com with ESMTP; 10 Nov 2014 09:21:02 -0800
Received: from orsmsx158.amr.corp.intel.com (10.22.240.20) by ORSMSX105.amr.corp.intel.com (10.22.225.132) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.195.1; Mon, 10 Nov 2014 09:21:01 -0800
Received: from fmsmsx102.amr.corp.intel.com (10.18.124.200) by ORSMSX158.amr.corp.intel.com (10.22.240.20) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.195.1; Mon, 10 Nov 2014 09:21:01 -0800
Received: from fmsmsx118.amr.corp.intel.com ([169.254.1.180]) by FMSMSX102.amr.corp.intel.com ([10.18.124.200]) with mapi id 14.03.0195.001; Mon, 10 Nov 2014 09:21:01 -0800
From: "Cavigioli, Chris" <chris.cavigioli@intel.com>
To: "Timothy B. Terriberry" <tterriberry@mozilla.com>, "rtcweb@ietf.org" <rtcweb@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [rtcweb] MTI Video Codec: a novel proposal
Thread-Index: AQHP/Qj2t1Us8NWOVUi3Mlc5jH+l4pxaGz8w
Date: Mon, 10 Nov 2014 17:21:00 +0000
Message-ID: <E36D1A4AE0B6AA4091F1728D584A6AD2400B1F58@fmsmsx118.amr.corp.intel.com>
References: <54601E19.8080203@nostrum.com> <5460F113.4090504@mozilla.com>
In-Reply-To: <5460F113.4090504@mozilla.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.1.200.106]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/rtcweb/TDohsnKLhV6kyPEroVJGNaz2AEQ
Subject: Re: [rtcweb] MTI Video Codec: a novel proposal
X-BeenThere: rtcweb@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Real-Time Communication in WEB-browsers working group list <rtcweb.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/rtcweb/>
List-Post: <mailto:rtcweb@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 10 Nov 2014 17:29:17 -0000

+1

-----Original Message-----
From: rtcweb [mailto:rtcweb-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Timothy B. Terriberry
Sent: Monday, November 10, 2014 9:09 AM
To: rtcweb@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [rtcweb] MTI Video Codec: a novel proposal

Adam Roach wrote:
> This has the property of ensuring that all devices and user agents can 
> work with all devices and user agents. This has the property of giving 
> no one exactly what they want. And, unlike any other previous plans, 
> this has the property of coming to a decision while maintaining 
> pressure on the only parties who can make a change in the IPR landscape to do so.

I think this is a good proposal, and I can support it. It's obviously not my preferred outcome, but it's better than a lot of other places we could have wound up. Of course, with Daala/VP10/etc. I'll still be working to get us to that better place, but for now I want to thank the fine folks at Cisco and Google for being willing to discuss this in a productive manner and help WebRTC move forward.

_______________________________________________
rtcweb mailing list
rtcweb@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email