Re: [rtcweb] Video codec proposals due October 15th, 2012

"Richard Shockey" <richard@shockey.us> Sat, 18 August 2012 18:36 UTC

Return-Path: <richard@shockey.us>
X-Original-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 376B821F849C for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 18 Aug 2012 11:36:42 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -100.742
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-100.742 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.002, BAYES_20=-0.74, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id XOEwobr6Csel for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 18 Aug 2012 11:36:41 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from oproxy12-pub.bluehost.com (oproxy12-pub.bluehost.com [50.87.16.10]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 32E6121F848F for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Sat, 18 Aug 2012 11:36:34 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (qmail 9311 invoked by uid 0); 18 Aug 2012 18:36:12 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO box462.bluehost.com) (74.220.219.62) by oproxy12.bluehost.com with SMTP; 18 Aug 2012 18:36:12 -0000
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=shockey.us; s=default; h=Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:MIME-Version:Message-ID:Date:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:To:From; bh=tTgGn+YDmF2N4Rnvxo1eDKcJMJblFNjrJMIxyL7t5ys=; b=XPi9ooUDFfi3bcQGUHr1V3DKQPOHjRZjRe8/VmDamXG8kctkSFghG6nwniWeBLBm2QrFa0hD1Y1/i28qsAYq7uHL6btHf2AVSrXT/lPvElFuDVJJ+XVl3EBsqcpMm9wN;
Received: from [71.191.243.130] (port=56050 helo=RSHOCKEYPC) by box462.bluehost.com with esmtpa (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from <richard@shockey.us>) id 1T2nsa-0006UX-6Z; Sat, 18 Aug 2012 12:36:12 -0600
From: "Richard Shockey" <richard@shockey.us>
To: "'Ted Hardie'" <ted.ietf@gmail.com>, <rtcweb@ietf.org>
References: <CA+9kkMDwPjg8OW_Km1oaue=b-=U1FPouKL82s7POR1zNRiWhfA@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CA+9kkMDwPjg8OW_Km1oaue=b-=U1FPouKL82s7POR1zNRiWhfA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 18 Aug 2012 14:36:09 -0400
Message-ID: <002801cd7d70$568c3210$03a49630$@us>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 12.0
Thread-Index: Ac170pzwuKrD/MqqQ+WsyqEqwqZFwwBnHaww
Content-Language: en-us
X-Identified-User: {3286:box462.bluehost.com:shockeyu:shockey.us} {sentby:smtp auth 71.191.243.130 authed with richard@shockey.us}
Subject: Re: [rtcweb] Video codec proposals due October 15th, 2012
X-BeenThere: rtcweb@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Real-Time Communication in WEB-browsers working group list <rtcweb.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/rtcweb>
List-Post: <mailto:rtcweb@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 18 Aug 2012 18:36:42 -0000

To make my position clear. The WG should support both H 264 and VP8. VP8 for
obvious reasons. H 264 since it is nearly universally deployed. 

I would like to remind the WG of the importance of this decision in another
context. Our obligation to support persons of with hearing impairments.   

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Video_relay_service

http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-184A1.pdf

Appendix B is instructive.  

There is a marvelous opportunity here to really do "the right thing" tm. 

-----Original Message-----
From: rtcweb-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:rtcweb-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of
Ted Hardie
Sent: Thursday, August 16, 2012 1:14 PM
To: rtcweb@ietf.org
Subject: [rtcweb] Video codec proposals due October 15th, 2012

As agreed at the recent meeting, the chairs solicit internet-drafts naming
proposed mandatory-to-implement video codecs or codec sets by October 15th,
2012.  Please include any technical data you believe supports the choice you
are proposing.  A non-exhaustive list of data you may wish to include is
found in slides 3-6 of
http://www.ietf.org/proceedings/84/slides/slides-84-rtcweb-4.pptx .

Discussion based on these will commence immediately upon receipt, rather
than waiting until the October 15th deadline, so early submission is
encouraged.

regards,

Ted Hardie
_______________________________________________
rtcweb mailing list
rtcweb@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb