IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [rtcweb] Question about support for RFC 6520 DTLS heartbeat

Michael Tuexen <Michael.Tuexen@lurchi.franken.de> Wed, 14 January 2015 20:06 UTC

Return-Path: <Michael.Tuexen@lurchi.franken.de>
X-Original-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EDBAE1AD374 for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 14 Jan 2015 12:06:58 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.561
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.561 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HELO_EQ_DE=0.35, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id CS4qO2tNy4jz for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 14 Jan 2015 12:06:56 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-n.franken.de (drew.ipv6.franken.de [IPv6:2001:638:a02:a001:20e:cff:fe4a:feaa]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AF0001AD36F for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Wed, 14 Jan 2015 12:06:56 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [192.168.1.200] (p508F28EF.dip0.t-ipconnect.de [80.143.40.239]) (Authenticated sender: macmic) by mail-n.franken.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id CFA0F1C10493A; Wed, 14 Jan 2015 21:06:54 +0100 (CET)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 8.1 \(1993\))
From: Michael Tuexen <Michael.Tuexen@lurchi.franken.de>
In-Reply-To: <CABkgnnU9D7kq9R_QtLcyw58jiyYLrvLjK==X=ur1=btesdpVCw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2015 21:06:53 +0100
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-Id: <1C5B610D-DA15-4DC6-82B3-E518748B1222@lurchi.franken.de>
References: <CAOW+2dsaAOmOS=VZe8VTRoSSjN0TAQzY2kXaOqHUCAf9jaA5Mw@mail.gmail.com> <DD273892-F62C-423C-A4FF-0BA8288A5454@lurchi.franken.de> <CABkgnnU9D7kq9R_QtLcyw58jiyYLrvLjK==X=ur1=btesdpVCw@mail.gmail.com>
To: Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1993)
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/rtcweb/TS_DV5qXEa2gyYvyhLMKVYXdBe4>
Cc: "rtcweb@ietf.org" <rtcweb@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [rtcweb] Question about support for RFC 6520 DTLS heartbeat
X-BeenThere: rtcweb@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Real-Time Communication in WEB-browsers working group list <rtcweb.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/rtcweb/>
List-Post: <mailto:rtcweb@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2015 20:06:59 -0000

On 14 Jan 2015, at 18:17, Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> On 14 January 2015 at 00:49, Michael Tuexen
> <Michael.Tuexen@lurchi.franken.de> wrote:
>> * DTLS does the PMTUD using DTLS heartbeats
>> * SCTP does the PMTUD using SCTP HEARTBEAT and PADDING chunks
>> 
>> My understanding is the RTCWeb uses the second option as described in
>> http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-rtcweb-data-channel-13#section-5
> 
> SGTM.  That means we don't need to reference the DTLS heartbleed extension.
It is not referenced in the RTCWeb documents, only in
https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-tsvwg-sctp-dtls-encaps-07
which allows both options.

Best regards
Michael
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email