[rtcweb] WG last call comments on use-case and requirement document, “Emergency Services”
Stefan Håkansson LK <stefan.lk.hakansson@ericsson.com> Mon, 29 April 2013 14:01 UTC
Return-Path: <stefan.lk.hakansson@ericsson.com>
X-Original-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DFEC521F9D1F for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 29 Apr 2013 07:01:12 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -5.949
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.949 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, HELO_EQ_SE=0.35, MIME_8BIT_HEADER=0.3, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id NlmsAgyV8Zqh for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 29 Apr 2013 07:01:11 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mailgw2.ericsson.se (mailgw2.ericsson.se [193.180.251.37]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 631C021F8433 for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Mon, 29 Apr 2013 07:01:11 -0700 (PDT)
X-AuditID: c1b4fb25-b7f366d000004d10-f0-517e7d2683d8
Received: from esessmw0256.eemea.ericsson.se (Unknown_Domain [153.88.253.125]) by mailgw2.ericsson.se (Symantec Mail Security) with SMTP id B2.1B.19728.62D7E715; Mon, 29 Apr 2013 16:01:10 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from [150.132.141.119] (153.88.115.8) by esessmw0256.eemea.ericsson.se (153.88.115.97) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 8.3.279.1; Mon, 29 Apr 2013 16:01:10 +0200
Message-ID: <517E7D25.2030706@ericsson.com>
Date: Mon, 29 Apr 2013 16:01:09 +0200
From: Stefan Håkansson LK <stefan.lk.hakansson@ericsson.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130328 Thunderbird/17.0.5
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: "rtcweb@ietf.org" <rtcweb@ietf.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Brightmail-Tracker: H4sIAAAAAAAAA+NgFrrKJMWRmVeSWpSXmKPExsUyM+Jvra5abV2gwdeVKhZr/7WzOzB6LFny kymAMYrLJiU1J7MstUjfLoErY8OhHWwFP7grTrZcZmtg/MjVxcjJISFgIrGyZxsjhC0mceHe erYuRi4OIYFTjBK/zn5khXDWMkrc/TyDDaSKV0BbYsWO32A2i4CqxLnb34C6OTjYBIIlZkwx AgmLCkRJ/Hu7mxGiXFDi5MwnLCC2iIC6xOWHF9hBZgoLzANacPkUK0gvs4C9xIOtZSA1zALy EtvfzmEGsYUEdCXevb7HOoGRbxaSUbMQOmYh6VjAyLyKkT03MTMnvdxoEyMwaA5u+a26g/HO OZFDjNIcLErivDOkKgOFBNITS1KzU1MLUovii0pzUosPMTJxcEo1MOpUt4ZcvzVvr+/i3z65 CfXfWL5L7QuJPbRF9OkVt1DBs9bKBdVzK7lEhDds+ePw58tb249Htx1Y9Tn3wIMd1lf45izL 4Tg2o2jTxrUNGw+cmsv0g906194hPXev5amAtceNg6++WXsyqmCnPldU9U+vrdHyn2Y+L155 41zRnCvxwsLONrJpe02UWIozEg21mIuKEwFFCc/R6AEAAA==
Subject: [rtcweb] WG last call comments on use-case and requirement document, “Emergency Services”
X-BeenThere: rtcweb@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Real-Time Communication in WEB-browsers working group list <rtcweb.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/rtcweb>
List-Post: <mailto:rtcweb@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 29 Apr 2013 14:01:13 -0000
This relates to the comments to the WG last call of the use-cases and requirements document [1]. The topic in this mail is Emergency Services. This was discussed in [2] - [16] (i hope I found all the relevant mails, please correct me if I missed any), and my conclusion is that we should not add specific use-cases or requirements for Emergency Services. Stefan [1] http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/rtcweb/current/msg06136.html [2] http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/rtcweb/current/msg06160.html [3] http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/rtcweb/current/msg06226.html [4] http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/rtcweb/current/msg06227.html [5] http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/rtcweb/current/msg06229.html [6] http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/rtcweb/current/msg06231.html [7] http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/rtcweb/current/msg06232.html [8] http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/rtcweb/current/msg06239.html [9] http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/rtcweb/current/msg06230.html [10] http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/rtcweb/current/msg06237.html [11] http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/rtcweb/current/msg06242.html [12] http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/rtcweb/current/msg06243.html [13] http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/rtcweb/current/msg06244.html [14] http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/rtcweb/current/msg06246.html [15] http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/rtcweb/current/msg06267.html [16] http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/rtcweb/current/msg06268.html
- [rtcweb] WG last call comments on use-case and re… Stefan Håkansson LK
- Re: [rtcweb] WG last call comments on use-case an… Gunnar Hellstrom
- Re: [rtcweb] WG last call comments on use-case an… Richard Shockey
- Re: [rtcweb] WG last call comments on use-case an… Bernard Aboba