IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [rtcweb] MTI Video Codec: a novel proposal

Harald Alvestrand <harald@alvestrand.no> Mon, 10 November 2014 23:04 UTC

Return-Path: <harald@alvestrand.no>
X-Original-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4A1C21ACEF0 for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 10 Nov 2014 15:04:06 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.493
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.493 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.594] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 9NtCx6q8Cae0 for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 10 Nov 2014 15:04:04 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mork.alvestrand.no (mork.alvestrand.no [158.38.152.117]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C35C61A8704 for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Mon, 10 Nov 2014 15:04:03 -0800 (PST)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mork.alvestrand.no (Postfix) with ESMTP id 110387C048D for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Tue, 11 Nov 2014 00:04:03 +0100 (CET)
X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at alvestrand.no
Received: from mork.alvestrand.no ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mork.alvestrand.no [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id XkL-BYNFlPoM for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Tue, 11 Nov 2014 00:03:58 +0100 (CET)
Received: from [IPv6:2001:67c:370:176:4805:b828:f652:a1bd] (t2001067c037001764805b828f652a1bd.wireless-a.v6.meeting.ietf.org [IPv6:2001:67c:370:176:4805:b828:f652:a1bd]) by mork.alvestrand.no (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 7493B7C03B3 for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Tue, 11 Nov 2014 00:03:57 +0100 (CET)
Message-ID: <54614458.2070204@alvestrand.no>
Date: Mon, 10 Nov 2014 15:03:52 -0800
From: Harald Alvestrand <harald@alvestrand.no>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.2.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: rtcweb@ietf.org
References: <54601E19.8080203@nostrum.com> <176316D6-D685-45F4-AA8E-A4F07521CAE4@matthew.at> <CABcZeBML8bfVNBO5HC69w4CkrHh148R6vo_8rgqM0+MuXhM1HQ@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CABcZeBML8bfVNBO5HC69w4CkrHh148R6vo_8rgqM0+MuXhM1HQ@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------010901090602050808060005"
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/rtcweb/TzNFMa2W7r2nA-nYRY-XYx1eN_w
Subject: Re: [rtcweb] MTI Video Codec: a novel proposal
X-BeenThere: rtcweb@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Real-Time Communication in WEB-browsers working group list <rtcweb.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/rtcweb/>
List-Post: <mailto:rtcweb@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 10 Nov 2014 23:04:06 -0000

On 11/10/2014 02:58 PM, Eric Rescorla wrote:
>
>
> On Mon, Nov 10, 2014 at 11:55 AM, Matthew Kaufman <matthew@matthew.at
> <mailto:matthew@matthew.at>> wrote:
>
>     I cited those three players just as examples of known positions.
>     There are several others, of course.
>
>     This proposal puts the large initial burden of IPR risk and/or
>     cost on the browser vendors... 
>
>     I think we would need to know how happy Apple, Google, Microsoft,
>     and Mozilla (plus the other major browser vendors ) are with a
>     requirement that both H.264 and VP8 be included with their browser
>     and/or operating system.
>
>
> As I said previously, we're fine with this requirement.

Google is also fine with this requirement.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email