Re: [rtcweb] Requiring ICE for RTC calls

Harald Alvestrand <harald@alvestrand.no> Wed, 28 September 2011 16:28 UTC

Return-Path: <harald@alvestrand.no>
X-Original-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EE0FC1F0C83 for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 28 Sep 2011 09:28:49 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -108.853
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-108.853 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=1.446, BAYES_00=-2.599, MIME_8BIT_HEADER=0.3, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-8, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 6JmLvCNUYHsQ for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 28 Sep 2011 09:28:49 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from eikenes.alvestrand.no (eikenes.alvestrand.no [158.38.152.233]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 41DC61F0C82 for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Wed, 28 Sep 2011 09:28:49 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by eikenes.alvestrand.no (Postfix) with ESMTP id 868FD39E0BB; Wed, 28 Sep 2011 18:31:37 +0200 (CEST)
X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at eikenes.alvestrand.no
Received: from eikenes.alvestrand.no ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (eikenes.alvestrand.no [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id kQihE-e7cux0; Wed, 28 Sep 2011 18:31:37 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from hta-dell.lul.corp.google.com (62-20-124-50.customer.telia.com [62.20.124.50]) by eikenes.alvestrand.no (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1458239E051; Wed, 28 Sep 2011 18:31:37 +0200 (CEST)
Message-ID: <4E834BE8.9060303@alvestrand.no>
Date: Wed, 28 Sep 2011 18:31:36 +0200
From: Harald Alvestrand <harald@alvestrand.no>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.2.21) Gecko/20110831 Thunderbird/3.1.13
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: =?UTF-8?B?ScOxYWtpIEJheiBDYXN0aWxsbw==?= <ibc@aliax.net>
References: <CAD5OKxtNjmWBz92bRuxka7e-BUpTPgVUvr3ahJGpmZ-U5nuPbQ@mail.gmail.com> <CAD6AjGSmz5T_F+SK2EoBQm6T-iRKp7dd4j8ZAF5JKdbbyomZQA@mail.gmail.com> <CALiegfmO54HC+g9L_DYn4jtXAAbLEvS++qxKa6TNrLDREs9SeA@mail.gmail.com> <4E80984A.903@skype.net> <CALiegfmyvTb57WVooKryS-ubfcg+w5gZ+zfO1zzBLn3609AzaA@mail.gmail.com> <4E809EE6.2050702@skype.net> <CAD5OKxvUOadaU0dnB7-Ho9cZ92VY+4Owuhj7oKPCx9Jy1iwT1Q@mail.gmail.com> <C2DF2C51-B3F7-443D-A047-7E6FB03E6D20@phonefromhere.com> <CAOJ7v-3AJJcdrCKcH4AJmv_016sZtcOPOo8yCv3Va65eJogAkQ@mail.gmail.com> <53C72381-DC23-4A6A-944C-B418791876B0@cisco.com> <CALiegf=nG+KXto9CXfn64CQSp3P5Lfm+S8c0xnA187Fhz=fcrQ@mail.gmail.com> <CALiegfnHABAdwH8TsmLP76AG1BuQL8GHRjd4t9TBTqmh-1Mibg@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CALiegfnHABAdwH8TsmLP76AG1BuQL8GHRjd4t9TBTqmh-1Mibg@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Cc: Randell Jesup <randell-ietf@jesup.org>, rtcweb@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [rtcweb] Requiring ICE for RTC calls
X-BeenThere: rtcweb@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Real-Time Communication in WEB-browsers working group list <rtcweb.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/rtcweb>
List-Post: <mailto:rtcweb@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 28 Sep 2011 16:28:50 -0000

On 09/28/11 18:21, Iñaki Baz Castillo wrote:
> 2011/9/28 Iñaki Baz Castillo<ibc@aliax.net>et>:
>> Just to add information about ICE Lite:
>>
>> http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-rescorla-mmusic-ice-lite-00
> However such draft is expired. Shouldn't it be considered nowadays in
> which, finally, we see the *real* requirements of ICE?
>
Browsers have to implement full ICE.

ICE-Lite is described in RFC 5245 - section 2.7, 4.2, 7.2.2 may be 
particularly relevant. There's an introduction to the subject in 
appendix A of the RFC.

Seriously, if you want to discuss ICE, it helps to read the RFC.

                  Harald