[rtcweb] FEC for audio?
Justin Uberti <juberti@google.com> Mon, 19 May 2014 16:44 UTC
Return-Path: <juberti@google.com>
X-Original-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4C1E11A0104 for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 19 May 2014 09:44:47 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.029
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.029 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.651, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id EkBz5UBTCbJL for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 19 May 2014 09:44:46 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-vc0-x22f.google.com (mail-vc0-x22f.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400c:c03::22f]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0AE031A0102 for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Mon, 19 May 2014 09:44:45 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-vc0-f175.google.com with SMTP id hu19so9766518vcb.20 for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Mon, 19 May 2014 09:44:45 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to:content-type; bh=WQobyk7lQdajg7g+8QiXZ/tjf3L/hBZD83C7QRz+CYQ=; b=KzteDmMpikcPtRIscUCABhWEB2q3ZzpRzgMJE/V2jB6BgE6FwoiAKEMz9IGpVIEIGD 4tbPg8TkZeveTTnAAC8h0Qmuuhqe2tODWQkje0dZwuD9N3MGBmtOpvfnJQjMOxEVtQ0d MOEdGV019W8K47v59S5KDdiSSQypGjX7sJ1FdVGedwGwaFwnQMhSgw6qJAaoHtDP7zgn 5vi1mxUmSuvdxG9wY5hO58eOUV8R0Zz7N7ICa9GjZ9N05Ixeef2v/Xf+JvKT89vSxtzJ IhJXJSa2xpA3OMkDShPBpGutVRP0L+xZTouOt05A5otkxh0YwOHe2WwdC87EyCps0lw+ Ex7Q==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to :content-type; bh=WQobyk7lQdajg7g+8QiXZ/tjf3L/hBZD83C7QRz+CYQ=; b=Oh2asZ9do9Oocho0g2nWJ5893Ro2bPDKRJDXD7dtPipEaqmfSsNVva8JupoM1UalcR GioUQQGktNWRcS7R/R1UVbSq4hzN0Dw4DuRDsW7zciOGP6U19+bjDSMS/PqyvZ+wxBd5 FZOsTju/ZVC3Ie8gwUIVEZ23vooB8z7UPRBNUYDH55niI9Q+L53HnNETLgv9StVUHpdF tcr/bNiUh4osLARNY98l5+9OKntqR9rtbDZ7QeDPsERZktrgGe5ZsFV/ocJl3YS8QRri kjWfOKaE3iI6jfUnRCat9yV+eXQWI7PxBpVeV2MMrYkY4SDI8BSeMpV36NS3FgC4vGkI 6U4A==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQkZdeIlgBEZPj94tJ2eJSvczun2FwrRetgNKtb3p9PbB3ZppQvwCem+QleIfVGhIU67yYpO
X-Received: by 10.52.93.132 with SMTP id cu4mr1132926vdb.76.1400517885348; Mon, 19 May 2014 09:44:45 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.52.145.105 with HTTP; Mon, 19 May 2014 09:44:25 -0700 (PDT)
From: Justin Uberti <juberti@google.com>
Date: Mon, 19 May 2014 09:44:25 -0700
Message-ID: <CAOJ7v-1qEpkWShmw1SQKh4_BLKycF=egu42TS9o9+Smtof36pg@mail.gmail.com>
To: "rtcweb@ietf.org" <rtcweb@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="047d7bd6c4a80ee82e04f9c37b88"
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/rtcweb/U7OO9NLOxYPpvcIgMNJrNrPQZCU
Subject: [rtcweb] FEC for audio?
X-BeenThere: rtcweb@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Real-Time Communication in WEB-browsers working group list <rtcweb.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/rtcweb/>
List-Post: <mailto:rtcweb@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 19 May 2014 16:44:47 -0000
Should we specify generic FEC for audio as well as video? Opus has built-in FEC, but it only works for the SILK portion of the payload, meaning that in high bitrate situations, it won't do much for you. I don't know if it has benefits over generic FEC. Some application providers have mentioned that FEC helps with audio intelligibility on cellular networks, so I think this is important to support.
- [rtcweb] FEC for audio? Justin Uberti
- Re: [rtcweb] FEC for audio? Peter Thatcher
- Re: [rtcweb] FEC for audio? Timothy B. Terriberry
- Re: [rtcweb] FEC for audio? Justin Uberti
- Re: [rtcweb] FEC for audio? Justin Uberti
- Re: [rtcweb] FEC for audio? Silvia Pfeiffer
- Re: [rtcweb] FEC for audio? Timothy B. Terriberry
- Re: [rtcweb] FEC for audio? Justin Uberti
- Re: [rtcweb] FEC for audio? Timothy B. Terriberry