Re: [rtcweb] Protesting the QoS document decision

"Eggert, Lars" <lars@netapp.com> Fri, 15 November 2013 08:51 UTC

Return-Path: <lars@netapp.com>
X-Original-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0105921F9FB4 for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 15 Nov 2013 00:51:54 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -10.932
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-10.932 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.333, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-8]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id MWWSyX3BDz30 for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 15 Nov 2013 00:51:49 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mx12.netapp.com (mx12.netapp.com [216.240.18.77]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 02C7921F969F for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Fri, 15 Nov 2013 00:51:49 -0800 (PST)
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos; i="4.93,706,1378882800"; d="asc'?scan'208"; a="115893561"
Received: from vmwexceht01-prd.hq.netapp.com ([10.106.76.239]) by mx12-out.netapp.com with ESMTP; 15 Nov 2013 00:51:47 -0800
Received: from SACEXCMBX01-PRD.hq.netapp.com ([169.254.2.51]) by vmwexceht01-prd.hq.netapp.com ([10.106.76.239]) with mapi id 14.03.0123.003; Fri, 15 Nov 2013 00:51:47 -0800
From: "Eggert, Lars" <lars@netapp.com>
To: Wesley Eddy <wes@mti-systems.com>
Thread-Topic: [rtcweb] Protesting the QoS document decision
Thread-Index: AQHO4K4KYVoKeLlMI0yCV4m8SvuejZok5sYAgACZZICAABXuAIAAHB4AgADSWwA=
Date: Fri, 15 Nov 2013 08:51:45 +0000
Message-ID: <6149C92B-220E-474B-910F-12FB2063BF11@netapp.com>
References: <5283DF61.9060807@alvestrand.no> <52848582.1070408@ericsson.com> <5285062F.9070204@mti-systems.com> <CA+9kkMBTh06=Zegv0D7315sWMbe=t-2Ow2kEry-x7hMcMcC-Sw@mail.gmail.com> <5285302A.2040903@mti-systems.com>
In-Reply-To: <5285302A.2040903@mti-systems.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach: yes
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.104.60.117]
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Apple-Mail=_1A83C850-A99F-48A2-A80A-E8CA002FE8E3"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1
MIME-Version: 1.0
Cc: "rtcweb@ietf.org" <rtcweb@ietf.org>, "rai-ads@tools.ietf.org" <rai-ads@tools.ietf.org>, "tsv-ads@tools.ietf.org" <tsv-ads@tools.ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [rtcweb] Protesting the QoS document decision
X-BeenThere: rtcweb@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Real-Time Communication in WEB-browsers working group list <rtcweb.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/rtcweb>
List-Post: <mailto:rtcweb@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 15 Nov 2013 08:51:54 -0000

On 2013-11-14, at 21:18, Wesley Eddy <wes@mti-systems.com>; wrote:
> IMO, this is a fundamental issue with the recommendation that
> differs from the way that DiffServ is implemented and thought
> about.  Classifiers operate based on flow-level n-tuple
> information generally.  The document pretends that what it's
> prescribing is perfectly normal, which I don't think is the case,
> and I don't know if it's even something the IETF wants to do.

+1

This really needs some deep thinking by the DiffServ folks. (And they don't hang out in RTCWEB.)

Lars