IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [rtcweb] Transport -03, bundling question (Re: Comments on draft-ietf-rtcweb-transports-02)

"Rauschenbach, Uwe (NSN - DE/Munich)" <uwe.rauschenbach@nsn.com> Mon, 31 March 2014 13:55 UTC

Return-Path: <uwe.rauschenbach@nsn.com>
X-Original-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E065F1A6EEC for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 31 Mar 2014 06:55:06 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.901
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.901 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 4kkKjgMn2bp8 for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 31 Mar 2014 06:55:03 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from demumfd002.nsn-inter.net (demumfd002.nsn-inter.net [93.183.12.31]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3BF831A6EED for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Mon, 31 Mar 2014 06:55:01 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from demuprx017.emea.nsn-intra.net ([10.150.129.56]) by demumfd002.nsn-inter.net (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id s2VDstMY031517 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL); Mon, 31 Mar 2014 13:54:55 GMT
Received: from DEMUHTC001.nsn-intra.net ([10.159.42.32]) by demuprx017.emea.nsn-intra.net (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.11) with ESMTP id s2VDssf7032351 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=FAIL); Mon, 31 Mar 2014 15:54:55 +0200
Received: from DEMUHTC009.nsn-intra.net (10.159.42.40) by DEMUHTC001.nsn-intra.net (10.159.42.32) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.123.3; Mon, 31 Mar 2014 15:54:54 +0200
Received: from DEMUMBX005.nsn-intra.net ([169.254.5.10]) by DEMUHTC009.nsn-intra.net ([10.159.42.40]) with mapi id 14.03.0123.003; Mon, 31 Mar 2014 15:54:54 +0200
From: "Rauschenbach, Uwe (NSN - DE/Munich)" <uwe.rauschenbach@nsn.com>
To: ext Harald Alvestrand <harald@alvestrand.no>, Magnus Westerlund <magnus.westerlund@ericsson.com>, "rtcweb@ietf.org" <rtcweb@ietf.org>, Harald Alvestrand <hta@google.com>
Thread-Topic: [rtcweb] Transport -03, bundling question (Re: Comments on draft-ietf-rtcweb-transports-02)
Thread-Index: AQHPTObLjc6enSf5ykSk+8PFAd7Jw5r7NiVA
Date: Mon, 31 Mar 2014 13:54:54 +0000
Message-ID: <56C2F665D49E0341B9DF5938005ACDF82B7921@DEMUMBX005.nsn-intra.net>
References: <5304829E.20809@ericsson.com> <5304FC27.807@alvestrand.no> <530C74A1.3000203@ericsson.com> <5338829B.3020505@alvestrand.no> <5339385D.6070006@ericsson.com> <53397036.5050104@alvestrand.no>
In-Reply-To: <53397036.5050104@alvestrand.no>
Accept-Language: de-DE, en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.159.42.107]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-purgate-type: clean
X-purgate-Ad: Categorized by eleven eXpurgate (R) http://www.eleven.de
X-purgate: clean
X-purgate: This mail is considered clean (visit http://www.eleven.de for further information)
X-purgate-size: 1238
X-purgate-ID: 151667::1396274095-00001564-93F5D101/0/0
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/rtcweb/UT0LSDeokEVXsrAq-wi5yH6lhas
Subject: Re: [rtcweb] Transport -03, bundling question (Re: Comments on draft-ietf-rtcweb-transports-02)
X-BeenThere: rtcweb@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Real-Time Communication in WEB-browsers working group list <rtcweb.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/rtcweb/>
List-Post: <mailto:rtcweb@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 31 Mar 2014 13:55:07 -0000

Hi Harald,

The decision in London to make ICE-TCP a "MUST" has not been implemented in the -03 draft
(I have noticed you have reflected the related TURN-TCP discussion already).

What are your plans for addressing the ICE-TCP decision?

Kind regards,
Uwe 


> -----Original Message-----
> From: rtcweb [mailto:rtcweb-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of ext Harald
> Alvestrand
> Sent: Monday, March 31, 2014 3:40 PM
> To: Magnus Westerlund; rtcweb@ietf.org; Harald Alvestrand
> Subject: [rtcweb] Transport -03, bundling question (Re: Comments on
> draft-ietf-rtcweb-transports-02)
> 
> Version -03 is now published. I hope you like it!
> 
> New outstanding item:
> 
> I added requirements for implementations to be able to generate both
> fully bundled (one 5-tuple for everything) and fully unbundled (one
> 5-tuple for each flow) configurations, and for implementations to be
> able to tolerate being hit with any combination of bundling schemes.
> 
> Is there a need to specify at MUST, SHOULD or MAY levels other
> combinations?
> 
> Harald
> 
> _______________________________________________
> rtcweb mailing list
> rtcweb@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email