Re: [rtcweb] Call for review

Justin Uberti <juberti@google.com> Wed, 06 March 2019 05:49 UTC

Return-Path: <juberti@google.com>
X-Original-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9259C12D4EF for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 5 Mar 2019 21:49:04 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -17.5
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-17.5 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_MED=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, ENV_AND_HDR_SPF_MATCH=-0.5, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5, USER_IN_DEF_SPF_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=google.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id o0iMluKpD-S6 for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 5 Mar 2019 21:49:01 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-it1-x12e.google.com (mail-it1-x12e.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::12e]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8B40F12D4E7 for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Tue, 5 Mar 2019 21:49:01 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-it1-x12e.google.com with SMTP id v2so7763420ith.3 for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Tue, 05 Mar 2019 21:49:01 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=SSJGdHDS72qEHyleu0aIL5XR0K6rgRhycjRpR/a3xPU=; b=tdYXyE15QIVnLmPj96o+Crn+iwZx+UnOJ6Tofe3p5r6fXMpHDbrv+HR7Y/zBCkMRxh W3RR1U5XbvPhOa3HIF+FlEeP6p8Ku6hPJoT56B8sunVzi2F979zuo7S3h7ci3+Uy44JL No3j2a4FEscFk1JYDJYmDsgBoGguPBLyZ0vjhsjbZewtqkZSbB3iYq8OPKsJNPGdCFiK yxlZIfEcG+Z5HDkaWC+ZQWX8jwAP7kwKs2axDjQSCeGmS5QZeo5aX9NWsW7SGIpcMihG 0EA8wqISEdJJ4MtfbwYi9UFJE5P2vsFT1t/98pYzRthGpr1bEZPWDhKKNZqehsw5BIUE OmMg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=SSJGdHDS72qEHyleu0aIL5XR0K6rgRhycjRpR/a3xPU=; b=bQVCe06N+0zGW6Xh2gECZxIQI1PmT8JQtKzSr9W/tr4vhDtkW/U4/V7fFLago4Hthr 68HdPz4QHKST2VHaAJzCHCqxs+hpBpN3WTilNQGZ4ccYKmtDtaZpWMLp2vpnI34xUdHH GQu7xA0bIdLz85Nm6OCbfBrPu5EqHfeTcbQQTEcYLzOU0GpJCU1Iho9Wmda8NOkYi1ym WepUeP//hzuhFPKAd+y0YO8ngYNDCQxmr71+rtDCzqAKy0oYNrkR17b1JfB9gfoNocIh JS4rWLyYFMnujKtVcsESsI5FQKpLUp/W/6+zBIvwGEDGGFTB1bYR64SFjNzrijFSPbTx 9ttQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAVBVDGCJW6HwGpV13w2CMmuRIgim3kjPLFE5b4xgtIxBRAJim0C uNt9L92bsUTRxQxsSaZJyucqI/EaN31BWm2u2H1Rvg==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqzSRs9W3YgLx5RW+Z/7WWt0fhJXSbPlxAbA5MGJUVyy8JIT95vs0c4WVARByyE3NLciwYStJp/x4otAFakNLCM=
X-Received: by 2002:a02:313:: with SMTP id y19mr3306000jad.88.1551851340348; Tue, 05 Mar 2019 21:49:00 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <CA+9kkMBEzEFtRyvApTs9p4AvixMFO0Fe-Z+Wk5mh09ZxY_4uOQ@mail.gmail.com> <17370418-5B43-43E2-A96B-CF03E627BE0F@mozilla.com>
In-Reply-To: <17370418-5B43-43E2-A96B-CF03E627BE0F@mozilla.com>
From: Justin Uberti <juberti@google.com>
Date: Tue, 5 Mar 2019 21:48:48 -0800
Message-ID: <CAOJ7v-1oi_BZk0Tfmf70=imujGwS7RRDbQHWK9SZ1eTaJfynhQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: Nils Ohlmeier <nohlmeier@mozilla.com>
Cc: RTCWeb IETF <rtcweb@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000e33fd20583668b65"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/rtcweb/UbxlHqMflkRHqSUJlHf-XtFlEyY>
Subject: Re: [rtcweb] Call for review
X-BeenThere: rtcweb@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Real-Time Communication in WEB-browsers working group list <rtcweb.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/rtcweb/>
List-Post: <mailto:rtcweb@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 06 Mar 2019 05:49:05 -0000

On Tue, Mar 5, 2019 at 8:44 PM Nils Ohlmeier <nohlmeier@mozilla.com>; wrote:

> I have reviewed draft-uberti-ip-handling-ex-mdns and in general it looks.
>
> One part is not clear enough to me though:
> - section 3.1 uses the term “preferred interface” for first time (I did
> not find this term in draft-rtcweb-ip-handling) and it’s not clear to me
> what it means.
>

Yes, I should have said "interface associated with the default route", to
be consistent with ip-handling.


> - section 3.2 does not use the term interfaces at all, but instead talks
> about IP addresses instead.
>
> I’m guessing section 3.2 implicitly refers to all IP addresses from all
> interface. It would help to make that explicit.
>

Technically correct; however, in Mode 2.* only the addresses from the
'default' interface are provided, so for clarity the document should
reiterate that fact (and that they are all replaced with mDNS names).


> Since “preferred interface” seems to be used first in the draft I think
> needs to be defined somewhere.
> Alternatively the term “preferred interface” in section 3.1 could get
> replaced with terms referring to IP addresses.
>

Open to ideas here; "interface associated with the default route" is kind
of verbose.

>
> Best regards
>   Nils Ohlmeier
>
> On 5Mar, 2019, at 12:22, Ted Hardie <ted.ietf@gmail.com>; wrote:
>
> Howdy,
>
> draft-uberti-ip-handling-ex-
> <https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-uberti-ip-handling-ex-mdns/>mdns
> <https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-uberti-ip-handling-ex-mdns/> is a
> very short draft describing two new modes  related to
> draft-ietf-rtcweb-ip-handling
> <https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-rtcweb-ip-handling> using bits of
> draft-ietf-rtcweb-mdns-ice-candidates
> <https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-rtcweb-mdns-ice-candidates/>;.
>
> The chairs would like to ask for a couple of reviews; given that it is
> four pages long, we are hopeful that it will not take much time.
>
> Please send your review to the list,
>
> thanks,
>
> Ted
> _______________________________________________
> rtcweb mailing list
> rtcweb@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> rtcweb mailing list
> rtcweb@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb
>