[rtcweb] Time division for codec discussion (Re: DRAFT Agenda for RTCWEB)

Harald Alvestrand <harald@alvestrand.no> Thu, 07 March 2013 15:37 UTC

Return-Path: <harald@alvestrand.no>
X-Original-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B582821F8CF3 for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 7 Mar 2013 07:37:06 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -109.99
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-109.99 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.609, BAYES_00=-2.599, DATE_IN_PAST_24_48=1.219, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-8, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Kxt0ebiwNeWm for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 7 Mar 2013 07:37:06 -0800 (PST)
Received: from eikenes.alvestrand.no (eikenes.alvestrand.no [158.38.152.233]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EE84921F8C8D for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Thu, 7 Mar 2013 07:37:05 -0800 (PST)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by eikenes.alvestrand.no (Postfix) with ESMTP id B87AA39E125; Thu, 7 Mar 2013 16:36:58 +0100 (CET)
X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at eikenes.alvestrand.no
Received: from eikenes.alvestrand.no ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (eikenes.alvestrand.no [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id CclyRJVlFHLe; Thu, 7 Mar 2013 16:36:58 +0100 (CET)
Received: from [172.16.39.56] (unknown [74.125.121.33]) by eikenes.alvestrand.no (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 07F1939E029; Thu, 7 Mar 2013 16:36:57 +0100 (CET)
Message-ID: <51372F03.40308@alvestrand.no>
Date: Wed, 06 Mar 2013 12:56:51 +0100
From: Harald Alvestrand <harald@alvestrand.no>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130221 Thunderbird/17.0.3
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: rtcweb@ietf.org
References: <CA+9kkMALouyyzN4dcGdF92TO2HGcBHbHR6fvHg7QC-x5ndCGjw@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CA+9kkMALouyyzN4dcGdF92TO2HGcBHbHR6fvHg7QC-x5ndCGjw@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: [rtcweb] Time division for codec discussion (Re: DRAFT Agenda for RTCWEB)
X-BeenThere: rtcweb@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Real-Time Communication in WEB-browsers working group list <rtcweb.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/rtcweb>
List-Post: <mailto:rtcweb@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 07 Mar 2013 15:37:06 -0000

On 02/27/2013 06:49 PM, Ted Hardie wrote:
> Video Codec                       10:15 to 11:30
> 1. draft-alvestrand-rtcweb-vp8-01 (15 mins)
> 2. draft-burman-rtcweb-h264-proposal-01+draft-dbenham-webrtcvideomti-01+draft-marjou-rtcweb-video-codec-00
> (25 mins)
>        Discussion (30 minutes)
>        Call the question (5 minutes)
On reconsidering this timeline, I feel that it is more realistic to 
expect 15 mins of presentations for VP8 followed by 15 mins of 
clarifying questions (not on the decision to be made, but in order to 
make sure everyone has a common understanding of what the VP8 
presentations were saying.

We will, however, live with what the chairs decide on time division.